Sentences with phrase «meant his comment as»

(EDIT: I don't mean this comment as a slight on anyone in the thread.

I am not sure that Merson means these comments as a compliment to be fair, or that Wenger is going to send his players out with the instructions to make it an open game, but I can see his point.

Though the person who sent it probably meant his comment as a... Average Age Arguments Against Online Dating Luke Mogford takes an unflinchingly honest look at his experiences with online dating.

Though the person who sent it probably meant his comment as a... Average Age For Dating Sites If you

Not exact matches

«Ontario is the largest subnational debtor in the world,» Oliver proclaimed from the comment pages of the Financial Post at the end of December, as if that (unsupported) fact carried profound meaning.

Maybe you tried and failed to remove a negative comment, a late payment, or an account that was marked «Paid as agreed» (which might mean the creditor agreed to let you pay less than you owed).

As Irving Burstiner commented in The Small Business Handbook, «Hiring the right people -; and training them well -; can often mean the difference between scratching out the barest of livelihoods and steady business growth» ¦.

Telegram's CEO did not respond to requests for comment by TechCrunch, whose report suggests the company sees the ICO as a means to operate as a self - contained banking platform.

Powell's comments were written off by some as a «rookie mistake,» meaning the Fed chairman did not intend to move the markets.

What he meant was something «slightly more measured» than Elon Musk's idea of building colonies on Mars, as Recode noted in a post about Bezos's comments.

So my comments tonight are not intended to point to any new direction in monetary policy — they are meant only as an elaboration on a couple of points in what we have already said.

I would really, really (I mean it) appreciate your thoughts and comments below, as I know I haven't thought of everything.

We are confident that more mainstream businesses will join the fray as they begin to take cryptocurrencies seriously as a means to broaden their investment portfolio into the nascent blockchain technology powered businesses,» commented Takao Asayama, CEO of Tech Bureau, Corp. «COMSA is a one stop shop solution for token creation and exchange.»

I assume the «lost in translation» comment is meant as a joke about the fact that some hispanics speak a different language?

This is the largest strings of negative comments I've ever seen on a CNN article for something that was just meant as a little inspirational story.

I know you are pretty much supporting my comment, and I don't mean to be rude, but I think Baden's exclusion of the Islamic approach is much more egregious than his non-mention of the Christian approach — seeing as half of the conflict he is discussing is driven mainly by Islamic people and Islamically - oriented ideology.

BTW — I should be clear; I am not intending to refer to homsexuals as sexual deviants, I didn't mean for my comment to enter into that side of the debate.

And, by the way, if your comment is meant as a criticism of Christianity (or of Jesus himself), then it falls flat anyway.

My observation reflects my history with an abusive church where public displays of spirituality were often used as a means of control and as such my comment was perfectly valid.

I suppose, as I review my motivations, that it was meant both as a comment and a public prayer; but I can also see some showboating (is that the right word?)

I mean, all you wanted to do was come in, offer several terribly unflattering insinuations about everyone who has been commenting negatively regarding Tony Jones (most especially Julie), disguise them as high - minded concern for truth and justice, and get out no worse for wear.

The meaning of the Cross, however, and its relation to the Resurrection, are discussed more fully in Professor MacKinnon's comments, and, since my reaction to his Meditation as a whole is one of agreement and gratitude, I now turn to two particularly interesting points which he brings forward in his «interpretation».

If it was my comment, thanks, but it wasn't meant as a joke.

As to your next comments, you are saying that when Jesus said «this generation» he meant «not this generation.»

but no need for all the politeness as you commented on everyone elses opinions with out saying «no ofense» see what i mean Hypocrisy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ops sorry i meant Amniculi... blah blah blah about Poe's Law,, its hypocrisy!!!!!! talk trash about Christianity should be able to do the same about Islam, not encourging it just saying do nt be scare!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! do it will its not a felony yet, cause soon you wont be able too... Let me be clear, I meant express your opinions, comments about any religion as you do about Christianity, plus Im not religious, i just believe in jesus christ son of god and the word of the bible which is difference religion is made by people...

The president of the Student Government Association serves as «master of ceremonies,» the president of the college makes comments, and there are two faculty and two student speakers, who are as likely to offer reflections on the year just ending as to address them - selves to questions of value and meaning.

But Peter Cotterell and Max Turner comments, «One of Barr's most important emphases was that it is not words which provide the basic unit of the meaning, but the larger elements of discourse, sentences and paragraphs».26 The attempt of using terminology and concepts without analyzing the text as a whole, will bring the literal translation of the text.

And by weird, I mean that it is too complicated for someone such as Wickman to blunder into some argument without the intellectual tools required to even have a mental picture of what she is commenting on.

A bit of bad form to jump in, as I can't say what meaning Ann intended, however, based on your comment, there was something I wanted to address.

And yet we find ourselves in the strongest agreement with the German scholar, Professor von Rad, whom we have cited before, in his own expressed feeling that after all, legend is not an adequate term, so long as it is commonly understood simply as a mixture of history and unrestrained popular imagination (one part history, nine parts imagination — our comment, not his) We much better understand legend as a combination of history and meditation, and as motivated primarily by a concern to give expression to the meaning of history, as that meaning is conveyed by the faith that God makes himself known therein.12

He then cites the Parable of the Madman (which I have repeatedly offered to you) & comments: «Nietzsche prophetically envisages himself as a madman: to have lost God means madness; and when mankind will discover that it has lost God, universal madness will break out.

As I have already commented (in note 3), it is quite unnecessary to insist that the text means to say that all 450 prophets in Israel (if that number is anywhere reliable) were present at the Carmel convocation and that Elijah himself, in person, was the executioner, dispatching them all with his own hand.

Apart from the fact that Genesis says nothing (even remotely) of the sort, I would not presume to comment on the Psalms, as I have not actually studied them, except to say that I v «aguely recall the translation of the word from Hebrew to the English word «fool» is a corruption of the Hebrew term which actually means (a person who is) «morally deficient», which might cast the statement in the psalm in a slightly different light.

Since I know you know full well I do not write a blog (as if that would give some sort of credibility) I can only assume your comments are meant to be condescending.

There are obvious sins in the world that need to be carefully attended to, but just because I, as a wife and partner, don't agree with something my partner does or thinks, doesn't always mean they need my correction, or worse, shameful comments.

When he commented - in response to the usual question about why he was so unreasonably opposed to condoms as a means of fighting Aids - that in fact condomdistribution isn't helping, and may be worsening, the spread of HIV / AIDS in Africa, he provoked an avalanche of hostile comment, much of it almost hysterical in tone.

«14 He adds,»... we must break once for all with the idea of death as simple destruction of an individual... individuals are eternal realities... «15 Using the illustration of a book he says, «Death is the last page of the last chapter of the book of one's life... «16 And he comments,»... death, like «finis» at the end of a book, no more means the destruction of our earthly reality than the last chapter of a book means the destruction of the book.

Appearing as they do in the context of vigorous debates among Roman Catholics about Pope Francis's leadership of the Church, Rose's comments are clearly meant to be taken not only as a criticism of Taylor but more specifically as the apology for «traditional» Christianity that Rose «regret [s] to say» he doesn't find in Taylor.

I'm not commenting on Wendy's integrity or her value as a person or her willingness to engage other viewpoints... we're talking about the damage done when an entire organization commits itself to helping others «manage their identity» or «address the pro-gay paradigm,» whatever that means.

Of course I meant this as a reply to Dave's and Steve's comments.

NP — my comment wasn't meant as a reflection on your research.

The comment about Christians being only Republican, only meant that the majority of Christian Republicans are fundamentalist Evangelicans and are against the GLBT having the same rights as anyone else.

Science by all means can comment and deny it because there's no proof but religion (and by extension, religious people) take this as an assault on them and their beliefs and so fight back.

Some comments can come across as really very ignorant, patronising and know it all as if USA is the world I mean for heavens sake, what country calls something «The World Series» when it is only ever held in their own country!

The comment was meant as a critique of the article and a demonstration of how its views would be considered heretical in most churches and to most scholars who study theology.

I mean, when I read blog comments or the like, people kinda talk funny as well (LOL, BFF, OMG).

LOL it's priceless how many critics of editorial decisions such as font size and page placement you get in these comments, as if «front page» means the same thing today as it did when they printed this stuff on actual paper...

I apologize but I don't understand your comment, no I do not mean this as a glib remark.

I don't mean this as any continuation of my complaint about the comments on Commonweal, but as a general question to which I don't know the answer.