Lower levels of implied volatility
mean less income from each call option sold.
Less traffic
means less income.
Yes, the distribution of incomes matters: high inequality
means less income for large numbers of people and the mega mansions probably don't make up for the gap.
at the retail level,
that means less income, thus a decline..
That will
mean less income will be needed when you retire, and more money for retirement savings between now and then.
Lower levels of implied volatility
mean less income from each call option sold.
Those limits are nearly double what was allowed in 2017,
meaning less income you pay taxes on.
Secondly, it does not necessarily follow that new ways of doing business have to
mean less income.
Not exact matches
Less income for people and businesses means less tax revenue for the governm
Less income for people and businesses
means less tax revenue for the governm
less tax revenue for the government.
As it turns out, people with higher
income levels are more likely than those of modest
means to opt for HSA - qualified health plans, because they are
less concerned by the potential out - of - pocket medical costs and more interested in the tax savings, according to Fronstin at EBRI.
In essence, if correct, this
means there is
less price risk in government debt securities than corporate fixed
income issues, and therefore the extra 10 % should largely be made up of government bonds rather than corporates and preferred shares.
Less income means less money to invest in homes, educations and retirem
Less income means less money to invest in homes, educations and retirem
less money to invest in homes, educations and retirement.
Less profits means less corporate income to
Less profits
means less corporate income to
less corporate
income to tax.
This particular deduction lowers your adjusted gross
income,
meaning that there's
less chance of you being rendered ineligible for certain other tax breaks.
Earning even a small amount of
income in your retirement years
means you don't have to rely 100 percent on your savings to fund your lifestyle, and that in turn
means you may be able to retire with a little
less in the bank.
It
means more women are paying
income tax, and
less women are on welfare.
Housing affordability is calculated as a share of household
income, so a higher number
means housing is
less affordable.
Because your deduction reduces the amount of
income taxed at your highest marginal rate, this calculation works in most situations since taking the deduction
means you have
less income being taxed at the highest rate you pay.
The great thing about having a high savings rate is that it
means you'll have
less income to replace during your retirement years.
(by «all
income» i
mean less than the $ 18,000 max) Also when you have a solo 401k for a side business, if you are a sole proprietor does the business have to be one specific thing?
A tax deduction lowers your taxable
income, which
means you owe
less money to the IRS.
That
means your gross
income,
less the amount paid for federal and state
income taxes, FICA taxes and local taxes.
They have to be because interest rates can only fall so much further and lower yields
means less interest
income.
But it also
means higher priced imports and so
less purchasing power for American
incomes.
That
means if your taxable
income is between $ 45,282 and $ 90,563, you'll pay
less tax.
Less disposable
income means the demand for housing declines.
Broader credit and
income requirements
mean less hurdles for borrowers.
This
means that banks prefer that 28 % or
less of your total monthly
income be allocated to your housing payments.
These additional monthly savings could
mean even more in a place that costs
less, and so could their existing retirement
income.
Tenants make
less than half the median
income of homeowners in the province and the dearth of vacancies — about 1 per cent in the city —
means rents continue to climb.
An appreciation of the exchange rate
means that: the increase in the domestic currency price of commodity exports will be
less than the increase in world commodity prices; the
income of the other tradable sector will fall; and real
income gains flow to the broader economy via the associated decline in the price of imports.
Less than 35 % debt - to - income ratio, this means your monthly debt payments are less than a third of your total in
Less than 35 % debt - to -
income ratio, this
means your monthly debt payments are
less than a third of your total in
less than a third of your total
income
A total payment including taxes and insurance is
less than 31 % of your
income means there's a good chance you qualify.
This
means new capital and reinvested dividends generate
less passive
income.
Doing so reduces your taxable
income,
meaning you would owe
less to the government.
A lower neutral rate also makes it more likely that interest rates will be constrained by the effective lower bound,
meaning monetary policy will have
less scope to support
income growth during periods of economic weakness.
If an elected official has a source of
income that is not dependent upon holding an elected office then that official is
less likely to be a professional politician than one who has no other
means of support.
That
means in this instance that economists refuse to judge whether it is better to add to the consumption of one person rather than another, that is, they are unwilling to judge that the increase of wellbeing in toto will be
less when a hundred dollars is added to the
income of a rich person than when it adds to the
income of a poor one.
On the whole, the rate of taxation is roughly proportional to
income, except for the richest 5 % of the population.5 These percentages take on more
meaning when it is recognized that 90 % of American families lived on
incomes of
less than $ 13,000 after taxes in 1970.6
* Lack of Champions League participation, which
means less direct
income but also
less exposure for our sponsors.
Like many families have done, we have recently gone down to a one
income household which
means that the belt is super tight and we live on much
less money than I ever thought was possible.
The proposed minimum
income floor will further distort the picture and will
mean that the self - employed will receive
less benefit than employed claimants even though their
income may be the same.
He wants a flat
income tax, for example, which would
mean taking more money from poorer people and
less from the rich.
Also, Don the Con has cashed his STAR checks that New York issued him annually
meaning he has shown
less than $ 500K
income.
Observed Danish fiscal
income in 2011 (# 3.5 billion), was considerably
less in absolute terms than UK
income (albeit higher in relative terms), because Danish production is a fraction of that of the UK (which also
means, incidentally, that Danish unit costs are higher).
«The combined effect of all [the government's] reforms will
mean that taxpayers with
incomes below # 40,000 will pay
less tax and national insurance contributions in April 2011 compared to April 2008.»
It is worth noting that while people under age 65 in the U.S. live in a heavily market - dominated economy where poor employment outcomes
mean poverty and a lack of access to health care, almost everyone over age 65 has most of their healthcare paid for by Medicare, (a FICA tax financed, single payer system that pays providers more or
less the same rates as private insurance companies and has few cost controls), more than half of their nursing home costs paid by Medicaid, (which is stingy in how much it pays providers and moderately
means tested), and receives enough of a guaranteed
income from the combination of Social Security and SSI payments to keep the poverty rate for people age 65 +, (even if they have no retirement savings of their own), above the poverty line, regardless of the state of the local economy.
- GDP per capita is still lower than it was before the recession - Earnings and household
incomes are far lower in real terms than they were in 2010 - Five million people earn
less than the Living Wage - George Osborne has failed to balance the Budget by 2015,
meaning 40 % of the work must be done in the next parliament - Absolute poverty increased by 300,000 between 2010/11 and 2012/13 - Almost two - thirds of poor children fail to achieve the basics of five GCSEs including English and maths - Children eligible for free school meals remain far
less likely to be school - ready than their peers - Childcare affordability and availability
means many parents struggle to return to work - Poor children are
less likely to be taught by the best teachers - The education system is currently going through widespread reform and the full effects will not be seen for some time - Long - term youth unemployment of over 12 months is nearly double pre-recession levels at around 200,000 - Pay of young people took a severe hit over the recession and is yet to recover - The number of students from state schools and disadvantaged backgrounds going to Russell Group universities has flatlined for a decade
The agreement finally reached on the local government pension scheme after the government made significant concessions has rather
less to do with official generosity than fear about the consequences if the scheme were so eviscerated that hundreds of thousands of local government workers might decide there was no point in continuing to contribute to it since, if they walked away, they would still get the same amount of money in retirement from
means - tested
income support.
That
means more than 48,000 people who live in the city have
incomes of
less than $ 23,500 for a family of four.