Mirosal, Yes, we all have the sin nature, but
I meant real evil, evil beyond our comprehension.
Not exact matches
The
real debate, then, is not over whether or not torture happened, but over whether something
evil can ever be done as a
means to a good end.
These with Alcohol or drugs are the key works of the devil... only now when seeing and realizing the
evil it brought among humanity into losing the
real meaning of the word «Human» it self among Humans...!!!
If you were a
real Christian you would know Christs words speak for themselves and the fact that he didn't take the sword away and turn it into a pruning shear right then and there does not
mean he was saying «I
mean all this stuff is for later after I come back and kill all the
evil people and those who haven't accepted me as their savior so you won't have to fear anyone so you can finally give up your guns and weapons of war...» You disgust me chad.
This does not
mean that there is no
real loss; and it may be that some
evil is not as such «redeemable».
If by «
evil exists» you
mean that
evil possesses a
real substance of its own, and that it therefore exists in the way goodness exists (or, for that matter, a tree, a rabbit, an idea or a dream exists), in point of fact Christian tradition has usually denied this quite forcibly.
Does this new emphasis on a «radical» and «substantive»
evil mean that we can no longer place Buber in that middle position which regards
evil as
real but redeemable, thus refusing to ascribe to it an absolute and independent reality?
But if a choice between
evils is to have any moral
meaning at all, one
evil will be judged less than another because it involves less destruction of some
real good.
There is no cartoon
evil or sex comedy foolishness driving any of the characters, and even the
meanest mean girl and the bro - est sex - obsessed bro dude have a couple moments that paint them as
real people, or at least as
real as high school kids can be.
In «Experiencing the Banality of
Evil in «Papers, Please»», Scott Juster mentions how moments like these in Papers, Please are
meant to reinforce the idea that, in
real life, and often in the most tragic circumstances, immoral acts are committed when morality falls to the whims of bureaucracy.
With that in mind, If you ever decide down the line to make a Resident
Evil like horror game akin to the first 3, please do, loving Ito
means knowing
real horror, and that game would probably rival amnesia, lol