Today the aim is to
measure anthropogenic global warming, the hypothesis is this is significant and positive and the null is that this is zero.
Not exact matches
The politicians who promote the concept of «Catastrophic
Anthropogenic Global Warming» have also promoted the following
measures:
The abstract certainly says so by concluding «The validity of the
anthropogenic nature of
global warming and climate change and that of the effectiveness of proposed
measures for climate action may therefore be questioned solely on this basis.»
In both my personal experience of peer review and in discussions with medical colleagues on this subject, I know — and, boy, BillD really ought to know — how the peer review process can get screwed up by the sorts of concerted and deliberately deceptive
measures practiced by the
anthropogenic global warming cabal that was cataclysmically de-pantsed by the Climategate revelations, particularly with regard to the insights provided by the e-mails of the C.R.U. correspondents.
It is nothing more than pseudo-scientific fantasy, dreamed up by an over-eager «climate» scientist to justify their greenhouse hypothesis.To summarize: Hansen did not discover the greenhouse effect;
anthropogenic global warming is a fantasy; all
measures to suppress the imaginary greenhouse
warming must be stopped.
These assertions include: — Supposed «out of date» findings from the IPCC and USCCP reports — Supposed decline in
global temperature (already debunked dozens of times)-- Supposed lack of endangerment from
anthropogenic global warming imputed from past improvements in
measures of U.S. health and welfare
We must forget the obsession with
global anthropogenic greenhouse
warming alone plus the implementation of draconian
global mitigation actions and shift our attention to local and regional climate and weather - related issues and any actionable adaptation
measures that can be planned and implemented in order to avoid potential problems.
Oreskes» studies on the much - repeated «97 percent consensus» agreement among scientists that the effects of
Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) require draconian political
measures has brought her praise and scorn from equally well - qualified commentators.
TCS as
measured by tropospheric sensible heat as a way to evaluate
global warming as a way to
measure climate change as a way to
measure the energy imbalance caused by increasing
anthropogenic greenhouse gases is a very poor and round - about way of
measuring.
Atmospheric surface temps have been used and marketed since the end of the last
global cooling phase from 1945 - 1976 and explicitly through the 1990 ′ s as the definitive
measure of «theorised» human - induced (
anthropogenic)
global warming.
Outside of how to accurately
measure the earth's atmosphere to detect the supposed
anthropogenic global warming signal, there is a mountain of damning evidence relating to the fraudulent tampering of the
global temperature record by climate activist government agencies — NASA and NOAA.
The current interglacial period is getting long in tooth so again by any sane
measure we should be worried about an impending ice age and if there is any merit whatsoever in
anthropogenic global warming we should be glad for it and try to get as much of it as we can in the hope that it might delay the inevitable return of glaciers a mile thick covering everything north of Washington, D.C.
The validity of the
anthropogenic nature of
global warming and climate change and that of the effectiveness of proposed
measures for climate action may therefore be questioned solely on this basis.