Sentences with phrase «measure dyadic»

To measure dyadic coping, the Questionnaire for the Assessment of Dyadic Coping (QADC) was developed.

To measure dyadic coping, the Questionnaire for the Asse

Support and contribute to the development of the Reflective Interaction Observation Scale (RIOS) to define, operationalize and measure dyadic interactions in reflective supervision / consultation

Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads.

He developed methods for studying the interactions among children that led to friendship and gained early expertise in measuring dyadic relationships.

Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads.

Not exact matches

The achieved value in the thing is always a measure of the interpretation, and the dyadic character of the truth relation is thus preserved.

The results show that eHarmony couples scored significantly higher in regard to all four components of relationship quality measured by the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS): consensus, satisfaction, affectional expression and cohesion.

The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) 22 is a 32 - item self - report inventory (score range, 0 - 151) that was used to measure intimate relationship satisfaction according to each partner.

A partial correlation was used to investigate the relationship between mindfulness, as measured by the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory, and relationship satisfaction, as measured by the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale, while controlling for life satisfaction, as measured by the Satisfaction with Life Scale.

Previous studies have identified four subscale factors measuring marital satisfaction, degree of consensus between partners, amount of affectionate expression in the relationship, and dyadic cohesion, or the degree to which partners function as a team.

The Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS)[12] is a widely used 32 - item measure of relationship quality based on Likert - type ratings of criteria such as agreement on activities and issues such as sex relations, philosophy of life, and religious matters.

Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale - RDAS (1), This scale is widely used in research studies related to couples and is intended to measure levels of distress.

Most of the studies listed above measured the marital distress based on the Dyadic Adjustment Scale («DAS») based on manualized procedures for EFT and included follow - ups several months after treatment.

Marital quality was measured by the four - item version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, a scale that includes items about marital happiness, confiding in one another, believing things are going well in the relationship, and thoughts of divorce (Sabourin, Valois, & Lussier, 2005; Spanier, 1976).

Relationship quality can be measured with the Dyadic Relationship Scale.

Measures included demographic data, the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, the Parents Rating of Program Effectiveness, and the Areas of Change in Parenting Scale.

Marital quality was measured with the four - item version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (Sabourin, Valois, & Lussier, 2005; Spanier, 1976).

Child emotional and behavioural adjustment, as measured by, for example, the Behaviour Screening Questionnaire (BSQ; Richman 1971); the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach 1991); the Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory (ECBI; Eyberg 1999); the Child Behaviour Questionnaire (CBQ; Rothbart 2001); the Dyadic Parent - Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS; Eyberg 1994), etc..

Mothers with mental health risk factors (depression, anger, history of abuse as a child, and substance abuse) exhibited poorer parenting skills than those without risk factors, as measured by the Parenting Practices Interview, Dyadic Parent - Child Interactive Coding System, and Coder Impression Inventory.

Limitations include reliance on self - reported measures, lack of generalizability due to ethnicity, and intervention effects on maternal depression or on dyadic couple relationship quality may have led to enhanced coparenting.

Measures utilized include the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI), the Toddler Care Questionnaire (TCQ), the Parenting Questionnaire (PQ) and the Dyadic Parent — Child Interactive Coding System - Revised (DPICSR).

Measures utilized include the Revised Problem Behavior Checklist (RPBC), the Issues Checklist (IC), the Conflict Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ), the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI), the Perceived Competence Scale for Children (PCSC), the Rating Scale of Child's Actual Competence (RSCAC), the Parent Competency Inventory (PCI), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), and the O'Leary Porter Scale (OPS).

Parenting competency and involvement were measured by the Parenting Practices Interview (PPI), Parent Teacher Involvement Questionnaire (parent and teacher version), home observations with the Dyadic Parent Child Interaction Coding System - Revised (DPCICS - R), and the Coder Impression Inventory (CII).

The 32 - item Dyadic Adjustment Scale (Spanier, 1976) measured marital quality, with varying response scales (e.g., 6 - point scales of frequency all the time to never and frequency of agreement always agree to always disagree).

He is developing measures based in dynamic systems theory for dyadic infant - mother (adult) interactions and their predictive relations to later outcome.

The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS; Spanier, 1976) is a widely utilized and well - validated 32 - item measure of marital functioning and satisfaction.

Measures of dyadic emotional expressivity (positive and negative affect) and dyadic emotional flexibility (transitions, dispersion, average duration) were derived from these interactions using state space grid analysis.

First, as mentioned before, differences may be due to measuring expressivity on an individual or a dyadic level (Moore et al. 2013).

Moreover, sensitivity maps onto dyadic synchrony, a global measure of maternal — infant relationship quality, and scores may be categorized in the «sensitive» (11 — 14), «adequate» (7 — 10), «intervention» (5 — 6) and «at - risk» (0 — 4) ranges.

The DCI (Bodenmann, 2008) with 41 items (α = 0.92) is a self - report measure of the frequency (6 - point scale) of dyadic coping that includes perceptions of own and partner stress communication and dyadic support (positive, negative and common dyadic coping).

DPICS Dyadic Parent Interaction Coding System, PS Parenting Scale, PSI Parenting Stress Index Short - Form, ECBI Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory, O observational measure, P Parent report measure

Although Hispanic Americans are one of the fastest growing ethnic populations in the United States, use and psychometric testing of Spanish versions of two instruments commonly used to measure quality of the couple's relationship and family functioning, the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) and the FACES II, have not been reported.

It has been validated to detect clinically significant internalizing and externalizing child behavior traits.15, 16 Factors potentially associated with child sleep and behavior problems were assessed, including marital satisfaction (measured by the single - item version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale) 17 and parenting (measured by 3 study - designed, 4 - point global scales addressing day - to - day behavior, sleep issues, and parent cooperation).

Twenty - seven of these measures assessed general family functioning, dyadic familial relationships, or families in the context of childhood chronic medical conditions.

Dyadic adjustment was measured using the Abbreviated Dyadic Adjustment Scale (Sharpley & Rogers, 1984; German translation, Köppe, 2001), and specifically quantified here as an individual's rating of agreement with partner on the amount of time spent together on a 6 - point scale (0 = always disagree to 5 = always agree; M = 3.99, SD = 0.79).

Eight measures assessing three types of dyadic family relationships were reviewed: (a) marital / partner dyad (three measures); (b) parent — child dyads (four measures); and (c) sibling dyads (one measure).

Frequencies, durations, derived measures and their correlations in studying dyadic and triadic relationships

The final measure of dyadic relationships, the Sibling Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ; Furman & Buhrmester, 1985), was designed to capture aspects of sibling relationships.

Our review of measures of dyadic relationships within families revealed eight «well - established» measures: three self - report measures assessing marital relationships (MAT, DAS, and MSI - R), three self - report (CRPBI - 30, IPPA, IC), and one observational measure (CECS) of parent — child relationships, and one measure of sibling relationships (SRQ).

The measures of marital / partner relationship include the Locke — Wallace Marital Adjustment Test (MAT), The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), and the Marital Satisfaction Inventory - Revised (MSI - R).

(iv) To examine how infertility and treatment characteristics predict the quality and change of marital relationships within the ART group, we conducted repeated - measure MANOVAs on dyadic consensus, marital satisfaction, dyadic cohesion and expression of affection at T2 and T3.

Infant sleep problems (standardized maternal questionnaire), maternal well - being (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale), child behavior problems (Child Behavior Check List for ages 1.5 to 5 years), marital satisfaction (Dyadic Adjustment Scale), and family functioning (General Functioning Scale, McMaster Family Assessment Device) were measured.

The dependent variables were dyadic consensus, marital satisfaction, dyadic cohesion and sexual affection measured at T2 and T3.

The current review provides information regarding the evidence base of measures of family functioning and dyadic relationships and reveals that despite some limitations, the majority of the measures described in this review are valuable sources of information and merit continued exploration in pediatric psychology contexts.

It consists of three scales: a General Scale (40 items), in which family members evaluate the family as a system, a Dyadic Relationships Scale (28 items), in which they assess their relationship with their partner, and a Self - Rating Scale (28 items), measuring individuals» perceptions of their functioning in the family.

For the purpose of this review, we use the term «family» to refer to the entire family unit as well as its subsystems, and included measures of general family functioning and dyadic familial relationships.

Interpersonal measures that were not associated with outcomes included Marital Quality, measured by the Israeli Marital bonds scale (Lavee, 1995), the Intimate Bonds Measure (Wilhelm and Parker, 1988) and the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (Spanier, 1976).