At least one other
measure of academic improvement, like graduation rates and, for nonnative speakers, proficiency in English, must be included.
Not exact matches
Arne Duncan, the new U.S. secretary
of education, got this right in Chicago when he made «student connection» one
of four outcomes that need to be
measured in his school
improvement plan efforts alongside student outcomes,
academic progress, and school characteristics.
To create such programs, states and districts must identify the most important elements
of student performance (usually
academic achievement),
measure them (usually with state tests), calculate change in performance on a school - by - school basis, and provide rewards to schools that meet or beat performance
improvement targets — all
of which must be backed by system supports that enable all schools to boost results.
Demanding accountability for results and
measuring achievement with the Texas Assessment
of Academic Skills (TAAS), a criterion - referenced assessment — actually, a rather blunt instrument — has spurred significant
improvement in student achievement.
The chief
academic officer
of CORE Districts will present learnings from nine districts that have already implemented a school quality
improvement index that
measures growth mindset, self - efficacy, self - management, and social awareness.
«Across the country, states, districts, and educators are leading the way in developing innovative assessments that
measure students»
academic progress; promote equity by highlighting achievement gaps, especially for our traditionally underserved students; and spur
improvements in teaching and learning for all our children,» stated U.S. Secretary
of Education John B. King Jr. «Our proposed regulations build on President Obama's plan to strike a balance around testing, providing additional support for states and districts to develop and use better, less burdensome assessments that give a more well - rounded picture
of how students and schools are doing, while providing parents, teachers, and communities with critical information about students» learning.»
Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), states now have the opportunity to support and encourage increased attention to SEL and the development
of a positive school climate by including
measures of students» social - emotional, as well as
academic, development in their accountability and
improvement systems.
At Imagine Andrews, we
measure the
academic performance
of our students primarily based on same - student learning gains (i.e., the
improvement in student achievement in reading and math
measured for the same students from the beginning until the end
of each school year).
Another facet
of this strong leadership is collecting and monitoring data and results, using
measures of school climate and
academic performance to create a culture
of continuous
improvement that is embraced by both staff and students.
The index
measures innovation activities and conditions
of urban schools along 42 indicators in nine categories: Innovation Culture Need for
Academic Improvement Collaboration and Coordination Read more about The U.S. Education Innovation Index: Prototype and Report -LSB-...]
«The Board is pleased with the new School
Improvement Framework, as it incorporates both
academic and nonacademic school quality and student success
measures to create a more holistic view
of a school's environment for students,» Kevin Laverty, chair
of the state board, said in a statement.
These Initiatives, and the ACTAAP, are the cornerstone for the
improvement of academic standards and achievement, professional development and accountability
measures for Arkansas schools.
Equitas Academy's 2012 - 2013 API score: 894 The
Academic Performance Index (API) is a single number assigned to each school by the California Department
of Education to
measure overall school performance and
improvement over time on statewide testing.
Progress monitoring is used to assess students»
academic and behavioral performance on an ongoing basis, to
measure student
improvement or responsiveness to instruction, and to evaluate the fidelity and effectiveness
of instruction.
Instead, they may first see improved attendance or graduation rates before they begin to see
improvements in other
measures of academic success.
For a district qualifying under this paragraph whose charter school tuition payments exceed 9 per cent
of the school district's net school spending, the board shall only approve an application for the establishment
of a commonwealth charter school if an applicant, or a provider with which an applicant proposes to contract, has a record
of operating at least 1 school or similar program that demonstrates
academic success and organizational viability and serves student populations similar to those the proposed school seeks to serve, from the following categories
of students, those: (i) eligible for free lunch; (ii) eligible for reduced price lunch; (iii) that require special education; (iv) limited English - proficient
of similar language proficiency level as
measured by the Massachusetts English Proficiency Assessment examination; (v) sub-proficient, which shall mean students who have scored in the «needs
improvement», «warning» or «failing» categories on the mathematics or English language arts exams
of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System for 2
of the past 3 years or as defined by the department using a similar measurement; (vi) who are designated as at risk
of dropping out
of school based on predictors determined by the department; (vii) who have dropped out
of school; or (viii) other at - risk students who should be targeted to eliminate achievement gaps among different groups
of students.
In this video developed for the Illinois Center for School
Improvement, Dr. Rebecca Zumeta Edmonds discusses ways that a multi-tiered system
of supports (MTSS) can help educators consider what student report cards can
measure beyond
academic performance.
However, they also have minimized it by adopting an accountability system, called «the dashboard,» for schools that makes
academic achievement only one
of several
measures of their competency, and leaves
improvement largely in the hands
of local school officials.
This
improvement in a school's contribution to student learning is a direct
measure of its changing
academic productivity.
Obama has joined the three presidents preceding him in favoring a far different policy
of school
improvement than that epitomized by Title I. Instead
of additional dollars for extra services for children, the creation
of academic standards and tests to
measure achievement is seen as the way to increase the quality
of American schools, especially that
of schools with concentrations
of low - income children.
Progress monitoring is used in conjunction with universal screening in an MTSS model (or by anyone who is interested in improving learning results for children) to set goals for a student's learning growth, quickly and frequently assess a student's
academic performance,
measure his / her rate
of improvement, and to evaluate the effectiveness
of instruction.
Whichever
measures schools adopt, they should drive a culture
of continuous
improvement and focus on supporting students» social, emotional, and
academic development.
Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), states now have the opportunity to support and encourage increased attention to SEL and the development
of a positive school climate by including
measures of students» social - emotional, as well as
academic, development in their accountability and
improvement systems.