Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), states are required to
measure school performance using four academic indicators and a fifth «non-academic» measure.
Not exact matches
The education department will also have the powers to create a second test for individual
school districts, if teachers at the
school don't want to
use the existing standardized tests as a
measure of their
performance.
Critics of NCLB's testing and accountability requirements have a litany of complaints: The tests are inaccurate,
schools and teachers should not be responsible for the test
performance of unprepared or unmotivated students, the
measure of
school inadequacy
used under NCLB is misleading, the tests narrow the curriculum to what is being tested, and burdens imposed upon teachers and administrators are excessively onerous.
The NEPC report
uses badly flawed
measures of
school performance that provide little information about how much students learn as a result of attending K12
schools.
This test should align closely to the curriculum, and every
school using that curriculum would
use that test to
measure student
performance.
She says that NAPLAN should be
used to identify areas for improvement at a
school or system level in areas such as mathematics and spelling, and not as a tool for
measuring teacher
performance.
A few thousand well - selected subjects might give us an accurate picture of 4th graders in a state, but these types of tests can not be
used to
measure the
performance of a student or
school.
In October, a Department for Education research report into teacher -
performance pay reforms found that, in 98 per cent of
schools, all pay progression is related to
performance and that 69 per cent of
schools use pupils» test attainment to
measure a teacher's
performance against «the expected national level».
We conducted our analysis alternately
using absolute student achievement,
measured with statewide mean SAT scores for the 1989 — 90
school year and the mean high -
school dropout rate calculated from 1990 census data, and with a second
measure that represents the deviation of actual achievement from expected student
performance.
Although the tests described above were created to
measure the
performance of
schools, CMU shared with the
schools ways in which they could
use the data generated to improve teaching and learning.
In contrast, Polikoff's public comment on draft ESSA accountability rules drew heavily on a large empirical literature as it argued against a federal mandate for states to
use proficiency rates as
measures of
school performance.
Our
use of proficiency rates, an aggregate
measure of
school performance, distinguishes our work from other recent studies that examine the
performance gains made by individual students.
Successive governments have
used the results of Key Stage tests, especially Key Stages 2 and 4, as
performance measures when holding
schools to account.
It was pretty radical, by New York standards, ordering
school districts to evaluate teachers
using student
performance data as one of the key
measures of teacher competence.
Well, in addition to
using a much cruder
measure of
school performance, the earlier analysis by the Times ignored the fact that the
schools in which APP graduates were placed were much lower performing before the new principals arrived — a fact that is clearly documented in the NYU study.
Trobe said: «It is important that the results of these tests are diagnostic and
used to support the work of the teachers and do not become yet another
performance indicator on which to
measure schools.»
A handful of
school districts and states — including Dallas, Houston, Denver, New York, and Washington, D.C. — have begun
using student achievement gains as indicated by annual test scores (adjusted for prior achievement and other student characteristics) as a direct
measure of individual teacher
performance.
Like a rapidly growing number of
schools around the nation, Ms. Dubos said, hers is considering
using portfolios as a way of
measuring student
performance in writing.
Measuring grit and
using it as a
performance measure for
schools has been rejected even by Duckworth, the creator of the grit construct.
The suit alleged that the district had failed to provide textbooks and keep discipline in classrooms,
used credit waivers improperly to improve graduation rates, and «dumbed down» standards for
measuring school performance.
The CORE districts are early adopters of the new accountability paradigm: local leaders
using multiple
measures of
school performance and working together to figure out collectively what works best for struggling
schools.
College / Career Indicator Reports and Data The College / Career Indicator
uses multiple
measures to provide a
performance level based on the number of students who are likely prepared for success after high
school.
Originally enacted by the California Legislature in 1971, the Stull Act requires
school districts to evaluate the
performance of teachers and other certificated employees
using multiple
measures of
performance, including student progress toward district and state academic content standards, as
measured by standardized tests.
State
performance measures for
schools, whether they
use the AYP
measure of the ESEA statute or alternative
measures developed by waiver states, must be predicated on regular movement by
schools toward an ultimate goal.
Furthermore,
measuring performance using the full range of achievement provides additional and useful information for parents, practitioners, researchers, and policymakers for the purposes of decisionmaking and accountability, including more accurate information about the differences among
schools.
Mr. Klein began to
use test scores to
measure schools»
performance, and joined with the Rev. Al Sharpton in forming the Education Equality Project in 2008 to promote good instruction and education reform for minority and poor children.
Uses multiple
measures to evaluate the college and career readiness of its high
schoolers, such as
performance in advanced courses and earning dual credit or an industry certification.
Explicitly endorsing or encouraging states to
use one of the two above - mentioned approaches as an alternative to proficiency rates as the primary
measure of
school performance.
By every criteria and
measure we
use, reading and math scores in NAEP, high
school graduation, drop - out rates, college attendance rates, public education's
performance is the best that is has ever been.
Accreditation also
measures different aspects of a district or
school, in addition to student
performance, such as parent communication and participation, improvement plans, leadership effectiveness, curriculum and instruction quality, student mentoring,
use of technology, and professional development.
They show that 1) Different academic indicators
measure very different aspects of
school performance, suggesting that states should be allowed and encouraged to make full use of multiple measures to identify schools in the way they see fit instead of reporting a summative rating; 2) The ESSA regulations effectively restrict the weighting of the non-academic «School Quality and Student Success» indicators to zero, which is not in the spirit of the expanded measurement; and 3) The majority of schools will be identified for targeted support under the current regulations, suggesting the need for a clarification in federal p
school performance, suggesting that states should be allowed and encouraged to make full
use of multiple
measures to identify
schools in the way they see fit instead of reporting a summative rating; 2) The ESSA regulations effectively restrict the weighting of the non-academic «
School Quality and Student Success» indicators to zero, which is not in the spirit of the expanded measurement; and 3) The majority of schools will be identified for targeted support under the current regulations, suggesting the need for a clarification in federal p
School Quality and Student Success» indicators to zero, which is not in the spirit of the expanded measurement; and 3) The majority of
schools will be identified for targeted support under the current regulations, suggesting the need for a clarification in federal policy.
This conflicts with ESSA's stated goal to identify the
schools where support is most needed, as the support system would effectively focus on only one type of
school because the indicators
used to
measure performance would not apply meaningfully to that
school type.
The study, by Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE), examines the potential effects of
using single
measures in California's CORE districts, where multiple
measures of
school performance are included in annual accountability reports.
The authors investigated the extent to which different academic
measures — academic
performance, academic growth, graduation, and English language proficiency — would identify similar
schools if
used independently.
• The annual testing in grades 3 through 8 required by the federal law will make it possible for states and districts to
use «value added» approaches to
measuring the
performance of
schools.
Our goal with this post is to convince you that continuing to
use status
measures like proficiency rates to grade
schools is misleading and irresponsible — so much so that the results from growth
measures ought to count much more — three, five, maybe even nine times more — than proficiency when determining
school performance under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).
Using a dashboard of
measures, states could
use a tiered approach to make a series of decisions about
school performance on particular indicators.
New Hampshire
uses multiple - choice and short - answer questions to
measure students»
performance in high
schools for the 2004 - 05
school year.
The Scholars» Paradise model would
use «scale scores» or a «
performance index» for the «academic achievement» indicator;
measure growth
using a two - step value - added metric; pick robust «indicators of student success or
school quality,» such as chronic absenteeism; and make value added count the most in a
school's final score.
With this evidence, and with the newfound flexibility under ESSA, there is no reason for any state to continue
using percent proficient as a
measure of
school performance.
Before NCLB, the only method
used to
measure student
performance was in terms of
school averages.
Professor Gorard said that while it is not fair to
use raw scores to compare
school performance, we shouldn't
use a
measure that is inaccurate just because people want a way to gauge
performance.
The district's opinion stems from a Federal waiver granted LA Unified and seven other California
school districts, allowing them to to create their own metrics for academic
performance in the temporary absence of statewide standards —
measures used to determine whether a
school is failing.
Using the Academic
Performance Index as a
measuring tool, the California Charter
Schools Assn. found that 12 of the top 15 public schools in California that cater primarily to poor children are ch
Schools Assn. found that 12 of the top 15 public
schools in California that cater primarily to poor children are ch
schools in California that cater primarily to poor children are charters.
Much of their attention is focused on which indicators of
school quality or student success they will
use to provide a more holistic
measure of
school performance than the test - based
measures of the past.
In addition to seeking a change in the way the state
uses data to
measure student, teacher, and
school performance, Mr. Schwarzenegger asked lawmakers to repeal California's charter
school cap, expand public
school choice, step up turnaround efforts for struggling
schools, and enact alternative - pay plans for educators.
States are
using new indicators to
measure and support student and
school performance under the Every Student Succeeds Act.
Attend this webinar to learn how the leadership of the Brevard County (Fla.)
Schools is accurately
measuring the
performance of principals and enhancing their professional growth, by
using an integrated platform through which administrators conduct meaningful evaluations and provide actionable results.
Now that a judge has ruled that teachers»
performance evaluations in the Los Angeles Unified
School District are inadequate and violate state law, the teachers union will finally have to work with district leaders on devising a reasonable method for
using student achievement to
measure teachers» work.
The Assembly bill also would let
school districts and private
schools choose from four tests that
measure student
performance rather than
use the tests selected by the state Department of Public Instruction.