Not exact matches
We met with three hundred charter leaders around the state to learn more about what could be done, and then built goals and objectives for the California charter
schools movement by first providing insurance, cash - flow financing, and other resources to
schools willing to
focus on academic
quality (
measured in many different ways).
I'm going to
focus on the final two posts, in which Greene argues that student achievement tests are poor proxies for
school quality and that they're not correlated with other
measures of
quality.
«Australia is investing record funding in education that will continue to grow, all targeted based on need, and the Turnbull Government is
focused on improving student outcomes through
measures we know are effective — teacher
quality, a better curriculum, greater parental engagement and support for principals to make local decisions about their local
school,» he said.
Academic Gains, Double the # of
Schools: Opportunity Culture 2017 — 18 — March 8, 2018 Opportunity Culture Spring 2018 Newsletter: Tools & Info You Need Now — March 1, 2018 Brookings - AIR Study Finds Large Academic Gains in Opportunity Culture — January 11, 2018 Days in the Life: The Work of a Successful Multi-Classroom Leader — November 30, 2017 Opportunity Culture Newsletter: Tools & Info You Need Now — November 16, 2017 Opportunity Culture Tools for Back to
School — Instructional Leadership & Excellence — August 31, 2017 Opportunity Culture + Summit Learning: North Little Rock Pilots Arkansas Plan — July 11, 2017 Advanced Teaching Roles: Guideposts for Excellence at Scale — June 13, 2017 How to Lead & Achieve Instructional Excellence — June 6, 201 Vance County Becomes 18th Site in National Opportunity Culture Initiative — February 2, 2017 How 2 Pioneering Blended - Learning Teachers Extended Their Reach — January 24, 2017 Betting on a Brighter Charter
School Future for Nevada Students — January 18, 2017 Edgecombe County, NC, Joining Opportunity Culture Initiative to
Focus on Great Teaching — January 11, 2017 Start 2017 with Free Tools to Lead Teaching Teams, Turnaround
Schools — January 5, 2017 Higher Growth, Teacher Pay and Support: Opportunity Culture Results 2016 — 17 — December 20, 2016 Phoenix - area Districts to Use Opportunity Culture to Extend Great Teachers» Reach — October 5, 2016 Doubled Odds of Higher Growth: N.C. Opportunity Culture
Schools Beat State Rates — September 14, 2016 Fresh Ideas for ESSA Excellence: Four Opportunities for State Leaders — July 29, 2016 High - need, San Antonio - area District Joins Opportunity Culture — July 19, 2016 Universal, Paid Residencies for Teacher & Principal Hopefuls — Within
School Budgets — June 21, 2016 How to Lead Empowered Teacher - Leaders: Tools for Principals — June 9, 2016 What 4 Pioneering Teacher - Leaders Did to Lead Teaching Teams — June 2, 2016 Speaking Up: a Year's Worth of Opportunity Culture Voices — May 26, 2016 Increase the Success of
School Restarts with New Guide — May 17, 2016 Georgia
Schools Join Movement to Extend Great Teachers» Reach — May 13, 2016
Measuring Turnaround Success: New Report Explores Options — May 5, 2016 Every
School Can Have a Great Principal: A Fresh Vision For How — April 21, 2016 Learning from Tennessee: Growing High -
Quality Charter
Schools — April 15, 2016
School Turnarounds: How Successful Principals Use Teacher Leadership — March 17, 2016 Where Is Teaching Really Different?
In Michigan, for instance, the new chief state
school officer recently replaced the test -
focused accountability system with a new grading system that relies on a broader set of
measures of
school quality, including family involvement, the
quality of professional development, attendance, and dropout rates, among others.
Under the NCLB Extended approach, embraced by many on the education reform / civil rights Left, achievement would continue to be
measured by proficiency rates alone (with rising annual goals for what is good enough); growth data would be used sparingly and / or
focused on «growth to proficiency»; «other indicators of student success or
school quality» would be minimized; and evidence of achievement gaps would sink
schools» ratings significantly.
The Professional Development Task Force, convened by state
schools Superintendent Delaine Eastin, concluded that many students will not be able to
measure up to new academic standards if the state doesn't
focus more on the
quality of the teaching corps.
This new unit should
focus on providing a student experience that excels on
measures different from the traditional
measures of
quality — such as top - notch extracurricular offerings and state - of - the - art facilities — that private
schools have historically used.
It just highlights the fact that how New York State
measures school quality is all over the map - and is certainly not outcomes -
focused.
Much of their attention is
focused on which indicators of
school quality or student success they will use to provide a more holistic
measure of
school performance than the test - based
measures of the past.
Focus groups in each community of students, parents, educators, and community members, along with polling data and research evidence, led to the creation of a
School Quality Measures Framework and subsequent online dashboard of the data that the community most wants to know about their
schools.
My research — which has
focused on teacher
quality as
measured by what students learn with different teachers — indicates that a small proportion of teachers at the bottom is dragging down our
schools.
TCTA pointed out that, given the struggle that the state has had in identifying non-test-based indicators of
school success for elementary and middle
schools, this would be an excellent opportunity to
focus on incorporating
school quality indicators (like a validated
school climate survey
measuring student / educator engagement and
school climate / safety).
She will support gauging
school quality based on multiple
measures while urging federal officials to keep the
focus on academic indicators.
The panelists — including Arkansas's Fort Smith Public
Schools Superintendent Benny Goodman and the National Center for Learning Disabilities's Laura Kaloi — also advocated for using multiple assessment measures to judge school quality, adding more flexibility for improving low - performing schools, maintaining a focus on holding schools accountable for the performance of student subgroups, tracking student growth, and ensuring states set high sta
Schools Superintendent Benny Goodman and the National Center for Learning Disabilities's Laura Kaloi — also advocated for using multiple assessment
measures to judge
school quality, adding more flexibility for improving low - performing
schools, maintaining a focus on holding schools accountable for the performance of student subgroups, tracking student growth, and ensuring states set high sta
schools, maintaining a
focus on holding
schools accountable for the performance of student subgroups, tracking student growth, and ensuring states set high sta
schools accountable for the performance of student subgroups, tracking student growth, and ensuring states set high standards.
Although just one component of the greater accountability system,
school classification systems are a top priority for states.1 As states design these systems, much of their attention is
focused on which indicators of
school quality or student success they will use for a more holistic
measure of
school performance.2 According to ESSA, these new indicators may
measure one or more of the following: 3
To achieve equity,
focus is placed on how a student's academic success is
measured, the
quality of the
school, and ways a
school can give proper resources to the students who need it most.
National Public Radio notes that ESSA requires states to cite five
measures of
school performance, with four
focused on academic achievement and a fifth tied to a «non-academic»
measure of
school quality or student success.