Before using, the powder is mixed with
a measured amount of warm water, then added to the paint.
Surface temperatures over land haven't gone up much, but that's not the only or even the best way to
measure the amount of warming.
like
the measured amount of warming or cooling during the year.....
Not exact matches
Contrary to popular believes, roasting «does not» alter the
amount of caffeine in the bean, but does give less caffeine when the beans are
measured by volume because the beans loose density during
warming.
That year the U.S. released 7.40 billion metric tons
of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), a
measure of the global
warming potential
of any greenhouse gas in terms
of the
amount of warming generated by CO2.
If a smaller
amount of reconstituted liquid is required, mix one
measure of medium to firmly packed Veta - Lac Feline powder with three
measures of very
warm water as described above.
The four dams produce a nominal
amount of power, which the CEC says can be replaced using renewables and efficiency
measures, without contributing to global
warming.
[* GtCO2e is billions
of tons
of carbon dioxide or the equivalent
amount of other greenhouse gases when
measured in terms
of their potential to
warm things up.]
Are the scaling values for KOE and SPCZ a
measure of the
amount of the
warming (cooling signal) in the wider region?
Well, ANU, snarky though you may be, you raise a nominally interesting point; the problem, however, is that the
amounts are anomalies; so the 90's are on average a certain
amount above the average
of the base period; now to compare the increase in anomalies in the noughties, which are higher than the nineties and say this is evidence
of progressive
warming, hottest ever, or whatever is the current alarmist catch - cry, ignores the fact that the true
measure of the
warming is not the absolute anomalies but their difference; that is the
amounts for the noughties should have the
amounts for the nineties subtracted from them and then compared with the nineties after they have the eighties subtracted from them.
Now, add a source at greater than 15C (like a
warm earth surface) and ad long as the rate
of incoming 15 um radiation is greater than the 15 um radiation rate you already
measured from your hohlraum there will be disequilibrium and the temperature
of the hohlraum (not just the CO2 but all
of the gas) will increase until the hohlraum is again emitting the same
amount of 15 um radiation as is coming in.
Global
warming depends on the
amount of CO2 in the atmosphere (
measured as parts CO2 per million molecules
of atmosphere).
As the name suggests, climate sensitivity is a
measure of how sensitive the climate is to this build - up in heat - how much the planet will
warm in response to an increase in the
amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
If 300 watts
of ghg back radiation
warms the earths surface by 30 degrees K above thermodynamic equilibrium, 300 + 1.5 watts / m2
of extra co2 induced
warming will proportionately
warm it by too small an
amount to
measure.
As explained in the press release, the scientists began with the
measure of sea level rise between 2005 and 2013, then deducted the
amount of rise due to meltwater (e.g., melting ice sheets and loss
of glacier mass worldwide) and then the
amount of rise due to the expansion
of water from the
warming in the upper portion
of the world's oceans (which scientists have good data on).
To be sure, it remains essential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by strengthening the Kyoto Protocol and augmenting it with other
measures; otherwise, the
amount of future
warming civilization eventually will have to endure will prove too great to survive.
PacifiCorp's four dams produce a nominal
amount of power, which can be replaced using renewables and efficiency
measures, without contributing to global
warming.