Despite the smaller (i.e., than for teachers and teaching), yet still significant
measured effects on student learning for school - based factors beyond the classroom — Hattie has calculated an effect size of 0.39 for principals / school leaders [3]-- research evidence has confirmed that «school leaders can play major roles in creating the conditions in which teachers can teach effectively and students can learn».
Not exact matches
But the NEPC report contains no information that can be used to accurately
measure the
effect of K12 schools
on how much their
students learn.
But, unfortunately, evidence from both the United States and other countries shows that more school resources and smaller classes do not have much of an
effect on how much a
student learns in school, as
measured by tests of achievement.
But if one digs deeper to
measure the adverse
effects of segregation
on the
learning of African American
students, a topic to which Coleman gave full attention, then one can only reach cautious judgments.
The dysfunctional nature of how urban schools teach
students to relate to authority begins in kindergarten and continues through the primary grades.With young children, authoritarian, directive teaching that relies
on simplistic external rewards still works to control
students.But as children mature and grow in size they become more aware that the school's coercive
measures are not really hurtful (as compared to what they deal with outside of school) and the directive, behavior modification methods practiced in primary grades lose their power to control.Indeed, school authority becomes counterproductive.From upper elementary grades upward
students know very well that it is beyond the power of school authorities to inflict any real hurt.External controls do not teach
students to want to
learn; they teach the reverse.The net
effect of this situation is that urban schools teach poverty
students that relating to authority is a kind of game.And the deepest, most pervasive
learnings that result from this game are that school authority is toothless and out of touch with their lives.What school authority represents to urban youth is «what they think they need to do to keep their school running.»
We can capture teachers»
effect on student learning through new
measures of
students» future academic success.
The value - added
measures are designed to provide estimates of the independent
effect of the teacher
on the growth in a
student's
learning and to separate this from other influences
on achievement such as families, peers, and neighborhoods.
As the Minnesota researchers put it, engaged
learning «had a significantly positive
effect on student learning outcomes as
measured by course grades.»
«We wanted to take a thoughtful approach so we could carefully consider how to best
measure performance and how to weigh the
effects of such plans
on student learning and teacher morale,» said Dan Moore, Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources.
Support school districts in designing and using formative indicators and protocols / procedures for
measuring district - wide implementation of focused improvement strategies and the
effect of such implementation
on student learning?
In the process, they are confronting the technical challenges involved in value - added analysis, which attempts to estimate a teacher's
effect on student learning by
measuring each
student's year - to - year progress.
In «Interactive
Learning Online at Public Universities: Evidence from Randomized Trials,» we measure the effect on learning outcomes of a prototypical interactive learning online (ILO) statistics course by randomly assigning students on six public university campuses to take the course in a hybrid format (with machine - guided instruction accompanied by one hour of face - to - face instruction each week) or a traditional format (as it is usually offered by their campus, typically with 3 - 4 hours of face - to - face instruction eac
Learning Online at Public Universities: Evidence from Randomized Trials,» we
measure the
effect on learning outcomes of a prototypical interactive learning online (ILO) statistics course by randomly assigning students on six public university campuses to take the course in a hybrid format (with machine - guided instruction accompanied by one hour of face - to - face instruction each week) or a traditional format (as it is usually offered by their campus, typically with 3 - 4 hours of face - to - face instruction eac
learning outcomes of a prototypical interactive
learning online (ILO) statistics course by randomly assigning students on six public university campuses to take the course in a hybrid format (with machine - guided instruction accompanied by one hour of face - to - face instruction each week) or a traditional format (as it is usually offered by their campus, typically with 3 - 4 hours of face - to - face instruction eac
learning online (ILO) statistics course by randomly assigning
students on six public university campuses to take the course in a hybrid format (with machine - guided instruction accompanied by one hour of face - to - face instruction each week) or a traditional format (as it is usually offered by their campus, typically with 3 - 4 hours of face - to - face instruction each week).
Despite overwhelming evidence that the tests are invalid ways to
measure teaching and
learning — and continuing signs of their unjust
effects on students and teachers — «reformers» and policymakers continue to force high - stakes tests into the public schools.
Our conclusion in our report to Congress and the public was sobering: There are little to no positive
effects of these systems overall
on student learning and educational progress, and there is widespread teaching to the test and gaming of the systems that reflects a wasteful use of resources and leads to inaccurate or inflated
measures of performance.
Another trend — exemplified by the humanizing law school movement — seeks to improve both
learning and
student well - being by decreasing some of the well - documented negative psychological
effects of law school created in part by the focus
on competition and extrinsic motivation.8 Law schools are beginning to respond to these reports by revising their curricula and preparing for anticipated changes in the American Bar Association (ABA) standards for law school accreditation that will require a greater focus
on student assessment and outcome
measures.9