Not exact matches
It is possible to do a small - scale test, with quite low risks, that
measures key aspects of the risk of geoengineering — in this case the risk of
ozone loss.»
Earth System Threshold
Measure Boundary Current Level Preindustrial Climate Change CO2 Concentration 350 ppm 387 ppm 280 ppm Biodiversity
Loss Extinction Rate 10 pm > 100 pm * 0.1 - one pm Nitrogen Cycle N2 Tonnage 35 mmt ** 121 mmt 0 Phosphorous Cycle Level in Ocean 11 mmt 8.5 - 9.5 mmt — 1 mmt
Ozone Layer O3 Concentration 276 DU # 283 DU 290 DU Ocean Acidification Aragonite ^ ^ Levels 2.75 2.90 3.44 Freshwater Usage Consumption 4,000 km3 ^ 2,600 km3 415 km3 Land Use Change Cropland Conversion 15 km3 11.7 km3 Low Aerosols Soot Concentration TBD TBD TBD Chemical Pollution TBD TBD TBD TBD * pm = per million ** mmt = millions of metric tons #DU = dobson unit ^ km3 = cubic kilometers ^ ^ Aragonite is a form of calcium carbonate.
But it is also well known that just looking at fields of total
ozone does not tell us much about chemical
loss (total
ozone is a
measure of the «thickness» of the
ozone layer).
But it is also well known that just looking at fields of total
ozone does not tell us much about chemical
loss (total
ozone is a
measure of the «thickness» of the
ozone layer).
Markus Rex graphs shows a linear trend for the increasing PSC volume, and the left y axis the POTENTIAL
OZONE LOSS (not the
measured one, am I right?)
But the team also
measured ubiquitous daytime concentrations of iodine and bromine oxides in the layer of the troposphere where most
ozone loss occurs.