When you plot observational sea ice data to satellite
measurements of albedo you should be able to verify the actual impact, thus your arguments in regard to albedo changes (or cloud cover) in time and space might be interesting but doesn't change the general assumptions, the observations.
«We used actual satellite
measurements of both albedo and sea ice in the region to verify this and to quantify how much extra heat the region has absorbed due to the ice loss.
Actual
measurements of Albedo are available.
In recent years, satellite
measurements of albedo show little to no trend.
«We used actual satellite
measurements of both albedo and sea ice in the region to verify this and to quantify how much extra heat the region has absorbed due to the ice loss.
Not exact matches
In contrast, the Scripps team opted to directly correlate
albedo measurements made by NASA's CERES instrument data with observations
of sea ice extent made by the Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM / I) radiometers aboard Defense Meteorological Satellite Program satellites.
The model variables that are evaluated against all sorts
of observations and
measurements range from solar radiation and precipitation rates, air and sea surface temperatures, cloud properties and distributions, winds, river runoff, ocean currents, ice cover,
albedos, even the maximum soil depth reached by plant roots (seriously!).
Comparison
of MODIS and MISR - derived surface
albedo with in situ
measurements in Greenland.
Albedo values of 0.08 come from direct satellite measurements, while your papers seem to apply to limited conditions and one looks like a hypothetical 0.2 a
Albedo values
of 0.08 come from direct satellite
measurements, while your papers seem to apply to limited conditions and one looks like a hypothetical 0.2
albedoalbedo.
Beyond the problems
of the high margin
of error
of shortwave
albedo measurements, and the lack
of a counter-factual on precisely and accurately what
albedo has been and what it would be in the absence
of humans, SO2 emissions globally appear to have peaked:
Do you know where to find actual
measurements of the Earth's
albedo?
«Additional work that looks at
albedo measurements, melting rate, and other types
of reconnaissance is also needed.»
The dependence
of the ECV data quality on main
measurement and retrieval parameters like the solar zenith angle, ozone column amount, latitude, and cloud parameters (fractional cloud cover, cloud top height and
albedo, etc. as appropriate) shall be investigated.
Interesting they both report
albedo variances
of 1 % which is also what Loeb reckons is the level
of error on the satellites
measurement.
Project Earthshine started in 1999; the Earthshine
measurements can not show that the
albedo of the Earth is mainly driven by the cloud coverage.
2008 G. Matthews, «Celestial body irradiance determination from an under - filled satellite radiometer: Application to
albedo and thermal emission
measurements of the Moon using CERES» Applied Optics.
Twohy et al. (1989) concluded from
measurements off the coast
of California and from simple radiative calculations that the observed levels
of soot would not lead to a significant impact on the cloud
albedo.
Variability
of biomass burning aerosol optical characteristics in southern Africa during the SAFARI 2000 dry season campaign and a comparison
of single scattering
albedo estimates from radiometric
measurements.
Actual instrument
measurements of humidity (TIGR) and
albedo (Earthshine) indicate they are not the constants they are presumed to be.
So how can we possibly start talking about anthropogenic forcings and surface temperature changes wrought by same when we don't even know to + -5 C what the average temperature
of the earth should be due to our
albedo measurements being so imprecise and having no bloody idea how, when, and why the earth's average
albedo varies.
We have imprecise data with respect to
albedo (Trenberth in his paper has
albedo measurements varying between 27.1 and 35.8 % and others have it is high as 40 % and the
albedo is constantly changing) and imprecise data with respect to the amount
of solar energy absorbed by the atmosphere and imprecise data as to the amount
of solar energy reflected by the atmosphere.
They base this claim on Earthshine data (a
measurement of the glow
of the dark side
of the moon that they use to deduce the earth's reflectance) and on an
albedo proxy derived from ISCCP parameters after they are regressed with two years
of overlapping, but not global, earthshine observations.
If it is from space, it's an
albedo measurement and the recovery has to do with a reduction
of cloud cover to let more energy in to restore the balance, but if that's true, then the mechanism is not clear because the signal to restore is not evident in the ocean temps, at least globally.
We also need in situ
measurements in the GrIS's ablation zone that can distinguish the relative contributions
of different impurity types (e.g., black carbon, dust, algae) to
albedo reduction as well as models that accurately simulate the GrIS surface energy balance and mass balance.