(Wonkish detail: Labour productivity
measures average productivity, but the mechanism described in the preceding paragraphs predicts that real wages should track marginal productivity — the extra output produced by an additional unit of labour.
Not exact matches
Rather than judge Canada's success on abstract
measures, which have little meaning to
average folk — GDP,
productivity, trade balances — Trudeau's candidacy is built on a pragmatic mantra: «A strong economy is the one that provides the largest number of good jobs for the largest number of Canadians.»
If you're skeptical about an «innovation index» meaning much in a practical sense, then consider this: in terms of
productivity (
measured by GDP per hour worked), Canada ranks far below the G7
average — a staggering 12 per cent below, in fact — and only marginally above that of the broader OECD.
Canadian workers»
productivity, or the output produced on
average per hour worked (which is
measure by dividing real GDP by an estimate of total hours worked over a certain period), dipped 0.5 per cent between July and September after declining 0.6 per cent between April and June.
The Toronto Stock Exchange compared ESOP versus non - ESOP public companies and showed that in ESOP companies: — five - year profit growth was 123 % higher — net profit margins were 95 % higher; —
productivity measured by revenue per employee was 24 % higher; — return on
average total equity was 92.3 % higher — return on capital was 65.5 % higher.
Growth in non-farm GDP per hour worked — a broad
measure of labour
productivity — has
averaged 1.8 per cent per annum since the start of the recovery, a higher rate than in the corresponding phase of the previous cycle, but slightly lower than in the 1970s cycle.
Both
measures are expressed in global hectares — globally comparable, standardized hectares with world
average productivity.