But Trian has reached these conclusions by
measuring apples to oranges.
Not exact matches
That's because financial assets include both stocks and bonds, while the red line features outcomes for stocks alone, so unlike
measures like market capitalization
to corporate gross value added, the chart below has a bit of «
apples and
oranges» at work.
It's
apples and
oranges, but
to the extent that a comparison can be made, the influence of journal impact factor seems stronger than that of either the number of citations your most cited article has received or of h - index, which is meant
to measure a scientist's productivity and impact.
-- http://notrickszone.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Temperatures-Global-Ice-Core-vs-Instrumental.jpg — http://notrickszone.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Holocene-Cooling-Northern-Hemisphere-Briffa-2002-Divergence.jpg — http://notrickszone.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Hide-the-Decline-Using-Mikes-Nature-Trick.jpg ------------------------------------ Which data set is more reliable: the
apples -
to -
apples one that uses continuous records throughout the
measured time period (i.e., proxy evidence, tide gauges), or the
apples -
to -
oranges data set that has been spliced and combined and changed
to fit biases and models?