To reach further back in time and provide a long - term record that can inform global climate models, scientists are turning to other means of
measuring ice mass.
Not exact matches
But gravity -
measuring satellites have shown that the continent's
ice sheets have been losing
mass since at least 2002.
Today both poles are getting warmer; in Greenland and Antarctica you can see the surface of the
ice dropping, and you can see there's less
mass when you
measure the
ice from space.
«The satellites
measure the height of the
ice shelves, not the
mass, and what we saw at first is that during strong El Niños the height of the
ice shelves actually increased,» Paolo said.
By looking at the ratio of two of these cosmic - ray - made elements — aluminum - 26 and beryllium - 10 caught in crystals of quartz, and
measured in an accelerator
mass spectrometer — the scientists were able to calculate how long the rocks in their samples had been exposed to the sky versus covered by
ice.
When the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites began
measuring gravity signals around the world in 2002, scientists knew they would have to separate
mass flow beneath the earth's crust from changes in the
mass of the overlying
ice sheet.
The results now published in Environmental Research Letters seem to contradict the data from a satellite mission based on other
measuring methods, which indicates a slight increase in
mass in the glacier
ice for an almost identical period of time.
The second is the gravity method, which utilizes NASA's GRACE satellite pair to essentially weigh the
ice sheets from space (it
measures minute changes in their flight path due to the shifting gravity field of
mass below).
GNET, short for «Greenland GPS Network,» uses Earth's natural elasticity to
measure the
mass of the
ice sheet.
Pratt and PNNL postdoctoral researcher Dr. Gourihar Kulkarni will study
ice formation using an environmental chamber, as well as particle analysis by laser
mass spectrometry (PALMS) to
measure ice residue chemistry.
The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), the satellites tasked with
measuring the
mass changes in Greenland and other icy landscapes around the world, has a hard time time seeing the difference between rising land and
ice.
To infer the
ice sheet's
mass, the team
measured ice flowing out of Antarctica's drainage basins over 85 percent of its coastline.
Ice mass loss in Greenland 2003 - 2009 as
measured by GRACE amounts to 223 + / - 29 Gt / yr.
The objective of the article that focuses on land
mass ice, being the more significant component, and Sea Ice being an anual effect stated, but not quantified, as the absolute measure being the more important eleme
ice, being the more significant component, and Sea
Ice being an anual effect stated, but not quantified, as the absolute measure being the more important eleme
Ice being an anual effect stated, but not quantified, as the absolute
measure being the more important element.
So the researchers used monthly data from the satellite mission GRACE, or the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment, which
measures components in the Earth's
mass system such as ocean currents, earthquake - induced changes and melting
ice.
The satellites
measure changes in gravity to determine
mass variations of the entire Antarctic
ice sheet.
To better understand the difference between
measuring ice volume and
mass, Simons compares it to a person weighing himself by only looking in the mirror instead of standing on a scale.
To carry out the study, the researchers developed a new sample extraction and
mass spectrometry method that allowed them to precisely
measure the carbon isotopic composition of methane in very small
ice core samples.
As I understand it, the GRACE results from NASA
measure differences in gravitational pull to determine the
mass of
ice while the Zwally study (also NASA run)
measures the height of the
ice / snow cover, estimates how much of that height is
ice vs snow, and then computes the resulting
ice mass.
Because
ice sheets contain so much
ice and have the potential to raise or lower global sea level so dramatically,
measuring the
mass balance of the
ice sheets and tracking any
mass balance changes and their causes is very important for forecasting sea level rise.
Also,
ice masses occur over cold regions — are
ice cores true
measures of global or regional climate - shift dynamics?
Satellite radar altimetry, in which timing of a radar or laser beam return back to a satellite is used as a
measure of surface elevation, enabled researchers to assess
ice mass by examining elevation change over time.
Much of the team's analysis was conducted using data from two different satellites - ICEStat, and GRACE which
measure changes in
ice mass using lasers and change in the earth's gravimetric field respectively.
The only comprehensive study of the Antarctic
Ice Sheet
mass was a 10 + year study based on continuous 24/365 satellite measurements over the period 1993 to 2003, covering 80 % of the AIS with estimates from other methods for the remaining 20 %, which can not be
measured by satellites (coastal areas and polar regions).
The figure below shows the total amount of surface (red) and bottom (yellow) melt through 1 August 2008
measured at seven sea
ice mass balance buoys.
Although the satellites are considered the gold - standard for
measuring and observing sea levels, hurricanes / typhoons, ozone holes, sea
ice, atmospheric CO2 distribution, polar
ice sheet
masses and etc., the same 24/7 technology used to
measure temperatures across the entire habitable world is now being ignored (i.e., denied) due to the above inconvenient evidence.
They are limited only by the amount of water the glaciers themselves release —
ice masses that hold volumes of water often
measured in cubic kilometers.
Each circular graph is proportional in area to the total
ice mass loss
measured from each
ice shelf, in gigatons per year, with the proportion of
ice lost due to the calving of icebergs denoted by hatched lines and the proportion due to basal melting denoted in black.
5) Contradictions due to limitations of technology (e.g., trying to
measure sea level rise in mm when the ocean surface is never still or
measure Antarctic
ice mass in a region with constantly changing surfaces due to snowfall and rising and falling regions).
Over the past quarter - century, both the extent of melting and the length of the melt season on the Greenland
ice sheet have been growing, as local temperatures have risen.6 Satellites
measure the extent of melting by differentiating between areas of the
ice mass that are fully frozen and those with surface meltwater.
Second, and less important but still rather spectacular, was the melting of virtually every square inch of the surface of this
ice sheet over a short period of a few days during the hottest part of the summer, a phenomenon observed every few hundred years but nevertheless an ominous event considering that it happened just as the aforementioned record
ice mass loss was being observed and
measured.
As explained in the press release, the scientists began with the
measure of sea level rise between 2005 and 2013, then deducted the amount of rise due to meltwater (e.g., melting
ice sheets and loss of glacier
mass worldwide) and then the amount of rise due to the expansion of water from the warming in the upper portion of the world's oceans (which scientists have good data on).
Those instruments
measure gravity anomalies (and hence
mass) and so are will be great at
measuring the loss of
ice from the
ice sheets etc..
Glacier
mass balance is
measured once or twice annually on numerous stakes on the several
ice caps in Iceland by the National Energy Authority.
Is it fair to say that total Antarctic
ice mass is the most important quantity to
measure?
The Washington Post asks Ian Joughin about a recent study, in the journal Science Advances, using a GPS network which
measures ice sheet
mass loss in Greenland and re-evaluates previous studies.
PRESS RELEASE Date Released: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 Source: Goddard Space Flight Center In the first direct, comprehensive
mass survey of the entire Greenland
ice sheet, scientists using data from the NASA / German Aerospace Center Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (Grace) have
measured a significant decrease in the
mass of the Greenland
ice cap.
Hager, B. H. Weighing the
ice sheets using space geodesy: A way to
measure changes in
ice sheet
mass.