The other ethical impact involving this question of
meat production changes would be the impact on species of animals.
Not exact matches
The first is climate
change, exacerbated by the greenhouse gases we encourage by burning fossil fuels, cutting down forests, and farming the way we do (particularly for
meat production).
In a new report, GRAIN outlines the contributions of industrial
meat and dairy to global climate
change, arguing that reducing their
production and consumption is one of the most important actions we can take to address the climate crisis now.
Scientific research increasingly demonstrates that large - scale intensive
meat production uses disproportionate amounts of land, water, and feed, adds markedly to climate
change and is a factor in water pollution and food contamination.
«Until broader
changes sweep through the
meat -
production system, eating less
meat... typically means leading a less resource - intensive life.»
Its authors state the case explicitly — «Agriculture, through
meat production, is one of the main contributors to greenhouse gases and thus has a potential impact on climate
change» — and anticipate that it will take «a long campaign... and incentives to
meat producers and consumers» to
change what and how we eat.
Trefor Griffith concludes: «Recently, there's been a trend towards locally sourced food and interestingly some supermarkets have adopted a «UK sourcing only» policy on all
meat products, forcing many suppliers to use only UK
meat,
changing food chain behaviour and encouraging investment in UK
production.
Global dairy and
meat production and consumption must be cut in half by 2050 to avoid dangerous climate
change and keep the Paris Agreement on track, according to a new Greenpeace report.
It said that increased
production of
meat and dairy products «undermines the ecological foundation of food security due to its contribution to land degradation, water pollution, biodiversity loss and climate
change».1
Humans could see a reduction in the
production of food — mostly cattle for
meat — as the provision of ecosystem services like this one
change.»
With many Americans choosing to eat less
meat in recent years, often to help reduce the environmental effect of
meat production, UCLA geography professor Gregory Okin began to wonder how much feeding pets contributes to issues like climate
change.
Post also points out that lab - cultured
meat will help lower methane
production, which contributes to climate
change.
Animal
production practices, particularly the nutrient composition of the diet, can
change the fatty acid profile of
meat, milk, and eggs.
[T] he main actors are parents
changing population, workers
changing affluence, consumers
changing the diet (more or less calories, more or less
meat) and also the portion of crops entering the food supply (corn can fuel people or cars), and farmers
changing the crop
production per hectare of cropland (yield).
Current U.S. dietary guidelines and many health professionals have recommended diets higher in fruits and vegetables and lower in red
meat as a means of helping to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and some cancers.316, 319,320,321,322,323,324 These
changes in food consumption, and related
changes to food
production, could have co-benefits in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
«
Meat production represents 18 percent of global human - induced GHG emissions... While the world is looking for sharp reductions in greenhouse gases responsible for climate change, growing global meat production is going to severely compromise future efforts... a study from the University of Chicago showed that if Americans were to reduce meat consumption by 20 percent it would be as if they switched from a standard sedan to the ultra-efficient Prius.&ra
Meat production represents 18 percent of global human - induced GHG emissions... While the world is looking for sharp reductions in greenhouse gases responsible for climate
change, growing global
meat production is going to severely compromise future efforts... a study from the University of Chicago showed that if Americans were to reduce meat consumption by 20 percent it would be as if they switched from a standard sedan to the ultra-efficient Prius.&ra
meat production is going to severely compromise future efforts... a study from the University of Chicago showed that if Americans were to reduce
meat consumption by 20 percent it would be as if they switched from a standard sedan to the ultra-efficient Prius.&ra
meat consumption by 20 percent it would be as if they switched from a standard sedan to the ultra-efficient Prius.»