Not exact matches
It is not
by accident that we have chosen a personal interaction and developmental model with certain
analogies to the psychotherapeutic relationship, rather than the
mechanical models of natural science hitherto aped
by historiography in its rush for recognition as a science.
We can only give our imagination a certain delusive help
by mechanical analogies.
(The relationship between molecular structure and photon absorption is a quantum
mechanical effect with no good commonplace everyday
analogy; some have tried to represent this
by visuals of springs stretching vs. bending but that's something of a hand - waving explanation.
Such
mechanical analogies are not representative of the behavior of internally generated fluctuations in fluid dynamical systems, and this is clearly seen
by comparison with externally generated oscillations like the tides.
Because legal problems arise in particular factual contexts, reasoning about the meaning of a legal rule often requires more than the
mechanical application of the general words in the text.3 Likewise, when an attorney reasons
by analogy, she considers the precise nature of the particular legal problem and context and does not simply compare the surface details of her client's case with a precedent.4