Some members of
the media argue this point, saying that the art is not accessible to the public, that they can not understand it without an art degree.
Not exact matches
There is little
point in
arguing that the Arsenal and Germany midfielder Mesut Ozil is currently enjoying his best season since he signed from Real Madrid over two years back, although I would say that he was nothing like the waste of space that some in the football
media tried to make out during the first two seasons.
However, there is little public appetite for a boycott of the World Cup in England, which has been reflected in comments by England manager Gareth Southgate (who has
argued England should definitely participate) and also in
media comment which has
pointed to the danger England could be excluded from future FIFA competitions if a political boycott was imposed by the country's leaders.
Much the same
point is made by the authors of the new BJSM editorial and in Back in the Game, where Kutcher and Gerstner
argue that suicide rates among former National Football League players, can be and have been affected by messaging in the
media — a phenomenon called the «suicide contagion» — and note how, in its coverage of the suicide of players such as Junior Seau and Dave Duerson, the
media has consistently ignored all seven of the recommendations of the Centers of Disease Control on how to avoid spreading that contagion, including not presenting simplistic explanations for suicide, not engaging in repetitive, ongoing, or excessive reporting of suicide, and not sensationalizing suicide.
Pointing to studies showing that the
media influences suicidal behavior, Iverson
argues that
media coverage reporting a causal relationship between contact sports, CTE, and suicide could actually be contributing to psychological distress in former athletes.
MoveOn's Eli Pariser made a related
point at the Personal Democracy Forum conference last month when talking about social
media: he
argued that they won't reach their full potential until we can move past the «gotcha» mentality.
A lot of people expressed scepticism of Wojcicki's
point on social
media, but Scripps Research Institute's Eric Topol, told Gizmodo that he felt Wojcicki's comparison was apt —
arguing that consumers are frequently much more savvy than doctors give them credit for.
Social
Media has changed so much about society: how information is dispersed, how we present ourselves, how we
argue points of view, and even how relationships are structured.
Some of these critical views have included parents voicing their concerns on social
media describing the graduation ceremonies as ridiculous and even conservative critics have
argued that «if this continues unabated down the age range, even to those too young to sit exams and receive grades, such awards have no
point and could even damage the will to work for success.»
The
media like their ABC refuse to have so called skeptics on their
media to
argue any
points.
Now, it doesn't go in the direction it sounds like you prefer, the long series of discussions on the science end up endorsing much of the core of the modern scientific consensus around the physics of greenhouse and global warming (though
pointing out places where public
media frequently
argues well beyond the science).
As is made clear in the statement Edward Davey's intent was not to
point to any particular group or party, but to the practice of public relations and lobbying in all areas of public governance, some
arguing for change, some
arguing for no change, and how it can sometimes be reflected unchallenged in some sections of the
media.
I'll give you the
media is uneven perfomer sometimes on the money often missing the
point but its hard to
argue this issue doesn't deserve the attention it has received.
Roberts appeared to have been the office's
point person on its strategy around the clinic violence issue — appearing twice before the Supreme Court to
argue the Bray case and making
media appearances to defend his office's position.
In fact, few would
argue with the notion that courts have a general duty to make court records accessible to the public, a
point that the Supreme court has made abundantly clear over the last few decades, and that is intimately linked to our fundamental «freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other
media of communication».
Facebook has previously
argued,
pointing toward some studies, that social
media downsides aren't inherent, but rather due to passive consumption.