Or why aren't clathrates played up in
the media by climatologists?
Not exact matches
That is what is needed though, some break from the silence, for Northerners to write down what is going on, or for doubtful Southerners to contact them just as long as their doubts exists,
climatologists mentioned above sum up very well what is going on, unfortunately they are often disavowed
by the
media, paralysed
by formented confusion illusions, from the North it looks like the truth competing in a game of musical chairs.
Let's forget for a moment that CAGW (as promoted
by IPCC) has become a tax - payer funded multi-billion dollar big business with all sorts of actors (corporations, environmental lobby groups, past and present politicians,
climatologists, the
media, etc.) all lined up at the trough, and look only at the «science».
As I predicted two weeks ago, there has been a
media and blog frenzy over the statement
by climatologist Phil Jones that global warming since 1995 has not been «statistically significant».
You'll quickly run across Pat Michaels, the University of Virginia
climatologist and author of Meltdown: The Predictable Distortion of Global Warming
by Scientists, Politicians and the
Media.
While much of the
media focus on the effects of climate change has been on the Arctic, a review of peer - reviewed scientific literature done
by researchers at Australia's James Cook University reveals that in the past 25 years there's been a expansion of the world's tropical zones and that human activity has contributed to it: The literature review shows that the areas which
climatologists and meteorologists consider to be the tropics (which is defined differently than in geography) have expanded at minimum 300 kilometers (186 miles).