Sentences with phrase «media changes if»

Not exact matches

But even if they had done a better job of adapting, they would probably still be fighting to remain relevant and profitable, because the media world has changed around them.

If you're fed up with Twitter and Facebook dominating the social media scene Pinterest could be the refreshing change you've been looking for.

Change is critical — even if it means losing top performers — because the world has changed and what happens in the culture of a company affects business metrics, said Huffington, who founded media website HuffPost.

If Disney changes Hulu too much, it may upset other media companies, who might respond by pulling their content off the service.

Even if you're not running for the top job in the country, social media can still help you shape minds and change attitudes towards your business.

Toronto's Sutton Place wasn't part of the deal, but it will likely have to change its name if, as the media - shy Gaglardi vowed in a statement last summer, Northland expands the chain to every major Canadian city.

On a side note, if your plan is heavily dependent on internet marketing, this step is even more important because it is very likely that a rule change could affect your plans and / or the entire media could stop working.

I promise that your view of social media will change forever if you have the great fortune to hear David.»

Regulation will not be far behind for social media companies if things don't change.»

stop crying and start building, If you want change make it happen instead of going on social media screaming (Bcash) all day long.

In today's «news» a media outlet could continuously post this story... as if it would ever change.

If the election results are substantially different than what the alphabet national networks have been telling us, then we know Obama has promised change and delivered to us a socialist - totalitarian police state where the media and journalists are under the complete control and financing of the White House.

If and when these messengers are recognized and incorporated into the media in general, an explosion of combined witness and moral change is likely to occur.

If societal views on gender and sexual orientation are changing as rapidly as the secular media might have us think, it is high time the Church sought to form a theological and pastoral response to transgender and the psychological condition that usually pre-empts a gender transition, known as gender dysphoria.

All these articles on the media circles are none - sense, if they think that they can stop islam to spread in america, and islam will rule oneday america and sharia will change your abstract ideologies and may allah guide you to islam all haters.

If conservatives had organizations that could fund one - minute, issue - based messages on streaming media that up - for - grabs voters might hear month - in and month - out, conservatives could change the political landscape.

History suggests that the real revolution — if we should call it that — is far more subtle and profound: new media forms change how people use earlier media forms.

Fea joined Morgan Lee and guest host Amy Jackson to discuss how Americans have historically voted on character in previous elections, how the mass media has changed the country's understanding of a candidate's moral failures, and when, if ever, the ends justify the means.

No need to set our faces sternly against the massive cultural power of the academic and media establishment if we qualify any peculiar practices we retain by the qualification: We're open to change, that is, you progressives may be right» in fact it seems you are, so please excuse our very temporary clinging to old ways here, we're just waiting for the right (that is left) revelation to come along, let's hope sooner rather than later...

We will better understand how the media affect our values and worldview today if we see in perspective just how much changes in communication media have affected cultural values throughout human history.

But if one extends what has been found in other situations, it is possible that the mass media may be having a marked effect on religious faith by changing the very foundations of social perception and social reality by which religious faith is expressed.

If there were serious critics on the real Barcelona media about how we are playing instead of the results, may be EV would have been pressured to change his ways if he ever had it in him which i doubIf there were serious critics on the real Barcelona media about how we are playing instead of the results, may be EV would have been pressured to change his ways if he ever had it in him which i doubif he ever had it in him which i doubt.

That was a real battering that should have changed everything for the media if we did not pay attention what happened vs Chelsea, Celta, Alaves, etc... But EV just got a pass in everything he does... I think it's because he is Spanish and they like him as he looks a gentleman and nice in his press conferences.

If I keep changing (the car) you (the media) will keep saying I have limitations.

If we are not careful this club will turn into another Leeds united... dnt we have arsenal fan groups there please come together and demand for changes... we keep on crying in social media daily that wont help us... please do something us fans are now turning to be a joke!

The protests and media attention may cause the Frenchman to consider an exit, even if he isn't thinking of one, but according to the Gunners Chiefs, it seems they have no intention of changing anything about Wenger's position this summer.

Forget this Ramsey news when Hector is now courted by pep for fun and if he is reminded of things that has changed Arsenal don't need the money along with kind of abuses Fabregas received from Barca fans and then also the Barca media and players blamed Arsenal for his bad - performance even - though he did really well.

If you were looking for a sign of whether all the confidence among us Arsenal fans and the nice things (for a change) said about us in the football media at the minute are an accurate depiction of where the current crop of Gunners stands when compared to our main rivals for the Premier League, including the dreaded Jose Mourinho and his expensively assembled Chelsea team, then you should be encouraged by the words of Arsene Wenger.

But I wonder if the Frenchman is starting to change his mind after Wilshere has continued to grow into the role to such an extent that he was the talk of the football media after his performance against Slovenia was capped by two stunning goals.

Sadly if we were to change him, the media would've surely known.

media, refs, whenever we begin to understand that jealousy can be harmful but that one must act as if those were usual standrads... then our «luck» will change.

I can only hope that this attempt is taken more seriously than the largely muted and clearly unsuccessful protests of late last season... although the plane writing escapade brought some much - needed attention to the matter, it failed to resonate with fence - sitters and those who had just recently fell off the Wenger truck... without a big enough showing of support the whole endeavor appeared relatively weak and poorly organized, especially to the major media outlets, whose involvement could have significantly changed what was to follow... but I get it, few wanted to turn on their club, let alone make a public display of their discord... problem is, they are preying on that vulnerability, in fact, their counting on you to keep your thoughts to yourself... who are you to tell these fat cats how to steal your money... they have worked long and hard to pull the wool over your eyes... they even went so far as to pay enormous sums of cash to your once beloved professor to be their corporate spokesmodel so that the whole thing would be more palatable... eventually the club made it appear as if this was simply a relatively small fringe group of highly radicalized supporters, which allowed the pro-Wenger element inside the club hierarchy to claim victory following the FA Cup win... unfortunately what has happened to this club can't be solved by FA Cups or a few players coming in, the very culture of this club needs to be changed and that starts at the top... in order to change the unhealthy and dysfunctional narrative that has absorbed this club we need to remove everyone who presently occupies a position of power... only then can we get back to the business of playing championship caliber football, which should always be the number one priority of this organization... on an important side note, one of the most devastating mistakes made in the final days of this hectic and poorly planned transfer window didn't have to do with the big name players like Sanchez or Lemar, but the fact that they failed to secure Jadon Sancho, who might even start for Dortmund this season... I think they might seriously regret this oversight... instead of spending so much time, energy and manpower pretending that they were desperately trying to make big moves, they once again lost the plot due to their all too familiar tunnel vision

If no one turns up to a game but the rest of the work still watch it, talk about it on fan sites and pay attention to the media then nothing changed.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

One more person has to go as soon as and thats ShadyStan, usmanov is an arsenal fan and will spend our own money whilst balancing books (getting rid of deadwood players and staff on the ridiculous wages most are on) he likes wenger but fans would mean more to him if he was the owner i could near guantee it we would see major ambition changes at the club... its funny though he would only be spending what we already have in the bank after this season is over and there will be more than the 200m quoted time n time again by the media.

If it where just possible to take these statistics, and sit down face to face with PGMOB, the FA and some media hacks, on a public forum, and ask them to explain them, along with the coincidence of how things changed following game 50 and Riley's subsequent appointment, I think that would make for a very interesting debate, especially if video evidence was alloweIf it where just possible to take these statistics, and sit down face to face with PGMOB, the FA and some media hacks, on a public forum, and ask them to explain them, along with the coincidence of how things changed following game 50 and Riley's subsequent appointment, I think that would make for a very interesting debate, especially if video evidence was alloweif video evidence was allowed.

As someone in the public eye, she wondered if the media industry would hinder her image as she made personal changes in her life.

If babies spend most of their time in swings, infant seats, or other «baby holders,» if the center doesn't offer organized activities that change regularly, or if television and other electronic media are a big part of the day's agenda, cross the facility off your lisIf babies spend most of their time in swings, infant seats, or other «baby holders,» if the center doesn't offer organized activities that change regularly, or if television and other electronic media are a big part of the day's agenda, cross the facility off your lisif the center doesn't offer organized activities that change regularly, or if television and other electronic media are a big part of the day's agenda, cross the facility off your lisif television and other electronic media are a big part of the day's agenda, cross the facility off your list.

Just like in organizing, social media is often a mobile - friendly way (if you don't have a robust SMS program) to keep your organizers in the field up - to - date on schedule changes and the like.

I do think both the media and the government itself can easily caricature «Old Labour» (the idea was to create a caricature) as if ideas of gradual change, appealing to broad coalitions had not been thought of pre-1945, in 1945, in the 1960s, etc..

«Morning Joe» host Joe Scarborough issues a warning to AG Andrew Cuomo today, saying he should change his media strategy or risk harsher - than - usual treatment from the Capitol press corps when and if he becomes governor.

I doubt I can convince my colleague to change his personal views on Corbyn, though perhaps he could at least see that it takes some strength to be subjected to a sustained attack by the PLP and the media and still come out fighting — even if he might only deign to call this stubbornness.

But if we aren't using it strategically, we've already lost at using social media to help us build the power to make the changes we want in our world.

Social media is a powerful democratizer that, if used well, can effectively change the hearts and minds of people.

In other words, these changes are exactly what we should expect to be seeing if we are paying attention to the social media landscape.

Granted, some change will occur if this happens, but it is perhaps telling that media sources linked to Plahotniuc have directed a negative campaign against Andrei Năstase and Maia Sandu, while largely ignoring Dodon, despite the latter theoretically being the main opponent of the government.

We put these questions to Prof John Naughton — author of A Brief History of the Future and early advocate of the Internet's power to change the world — and ask if politicians are tuned - in to the transformative potential of social media.

In the context of the election itself, several media outlets have consistently emphasised links between Lupu, Dodon and Plahotniuc, implying that if either Lupu or Dodon wins, it will remain business as usual and another window of opportunity will have been missed for both Romania and the EU to advocate real change in the country.

«If you don't see me make media noise over my campaign for Mahama, it's because the campaign strategy have changed — no more too much social media campaign.»

Asked if they believe the news media is «exaggerating the problems with the Trump Administration because they are uncomfortable and threatened with the kind of change Trump represents,» 89 % of Republicans agreed.