Whilst
the media fuels the debate with sensationalist articles which highlight criticism of mums breastfeeding, we must remember that they concentrate on the stories that create the discord rather then celebrate the positive everyday experiences which go without comment.
Not exact matches
The problem with this
debate,
fueled by constant studies and subsequent breathless
media coverage, is this: America's home - birth data are incomplete.
My problem with all of this is that it's yet another lobotomy for our political
debate,
fuelled by the increasingly common spasms of outrage in both traditional and social
media.
News
media coverage in the 1980s and early 1990s
fueled fears of a national cancer epidemic caused by power lines and generated a
debate that still lingers today.
The way the
media and cable TV frame the national
debate may make it seem like there's an even split between supporters of fossil
fuels and supporters of renewable alternatives.
The truth is a vigorous global scientific
debate persists over whether man's use of carbon - based
fuels threatens to cause catastrophic global warming, and the
media not reporting that is not performing journalism.
Over the course of 2 1/2 days, 150 participants from over 40 countries listened and
debated on issues in renewables, ranging from fossil
fuel subsidies, to the impact of the
media and public relations, and vision for the next decade of renewables.
Still, because lawyers are also information professionals, and given that social
media and the legal profession share an increasingly large border, these insights can
fuel debate within the law.