Christine Valenti, the team's T3 leader, helped focus her team on the school's ambitious math and reading goal: increase
the median Student Growth Percentile on the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System to 60 or above in both subject areas.
On May 17, the HSTA - HIDOE Joint Committee presented recommendations, approved by the Superintendent, to the Board of Education to remove student test scores [measured in the previous version of the evaluation system as
median Student Growth Percentiles (SPG)-RSB- as required for teacher performance evaluation.
If a teacher's
median student growth score in 2014 - 15 is lower than prior years, it won't be counted alone: What if Mrs. Smith's median growth score of her 25 students this year is 55, but her score from last year's 24 students was 75?
The median student growth score from a teacher's class is the score that is factored into that teacher's evaluation: So, for example, if Mrs. Smith has 25 students take PARCC, the 13th best student growth score is the one that would count for toward her performance rating.
Some states have chosen to include school value - added (or the school's
median student growth percentile, which is similar to value - added) as a component in the evaluation of principals.
Principals are also evaluated based on PARCC data: Principals of schools with any grade from 4 - 8 taking the PARCC tests will also have
a median student growth score used as a 10 percent weight in their evaluations.
For principals,
the median student growth score of all students in the school is the score factored into the evaluation.
It's absolutely true that the MSGPs (
Median Student Growth Percentiles) lag peers and state expectation, and puts student growth at the bottom quarter or quintile for LA and math.
To calculate a final evaluation score, mSGPs are converted to a 1.0 - 4.0 score according to
the Median Student Growth Percentile Conversion Chart, then weighted and included along with the other components of evaluation.
This includes any individual score on a component of the evaluation, such as
the median Student Growth Percentile score, Student Growth Objective score, observation ratings, etc..
Given these USDOE restrictions, one might think that the only option is for states and districts to choose a sparse growth model, such as
median student growth percentiles (SGPs), that only controls for past student exam scores in estimating student growth.
Not exact matches
To produce a
growth measure for a district, school, or teacher, the SGPs for individual
students are combined, usually by calculating the
median SGP for all
students in the relevant unit.
This score is called the
median growth percentile (MGP), and it is useful because, unlike a simple average, it doesn't change much if one or two
students do unusually well or unusually poorly relative to their peers.
Schools with the highest
median growth percentile (MGP) are doing the most with their
students to improve individual performance from one year to the next.
Since this year's score is lower, the state will calculate the
median growth score of all 49
students she taught over the past two years.
During the transformation, Fruita Middle School was the only middle school in the district recognized for achieving
student growth above the state
median in every tested subject, in all grades, and with every demographic subgroup of
students measured by the State of Colorado.
The district's
median growth percentile was 55 in writing and math — meaning the
growth rate of those
students was higher than 55 percent of
students statewide.
The
median growth percentile is the average
growth percentile of all
students within the school or district).
In Denver, RMP has demonstrated impressive
growth with a
median growth percentile of 76 % with similar
student populations to those at Fletcher.
The
median growth percentile is the average
growth percentile of all
students within the school or district.
[1] Generally, a
median growth percentile below 50 indicates that a district is not make dramatic progress for its
students which is especially important in a district like APS where only about 1 in 5 reported
students met grade - level expectations on PARCC tests.
This year, APS»
median growth percentile of 47 in ELA and 46 in math indicate that
students are not growing rapidly enough to close the achievement gap that exists between APS and the state.
The bill, sponsored by Rep. Mike Winder, R - West Valley City, relies on a metric called
median growth percentile, or MGP, to identify teachers who show high levels of
student growth on standardized tests.
[2], [3] An example of such a model is a
student growth percentile [4] model used to calculate
median growth percentiles for a teacher of fourth grade mathematics that controls only for
students» prior third grade mathematics scores.
While this information signals improvement, Trevista was a «Red» school in 2013 and 2014; because of its most recent
median growth scores were near the 60th percentile (good but not close to what is needed for these
students), the school is now «Green.»
Growth was also lower for
students of color than white
students:
students of color had an (
Median Growth Percentile) MGP of 48.5 in English Language Arts in and 51.5 MGP in Math.