Rudd v. Trossacs Investments Inc. [1] Last July, Justice Lederman of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice surprised many in making an exception to
mediation confidentiality by ordering a mediator... [more] Full article
Not exact matches
It is to be hoped that an occasion will arise before the deadline imposed for the implementation of the
Mediation Directive when a court will be enabled to determine, after the hearing of full argument, whether a present shortfall in the protection afforded to the confidentiality of the mediation process should be remedied by the recognition of a new common law privilege, tailored to this new dispute resolution
Mediation Directive when a court will be enabled to determine, after the hearing of full argument, whether a present shortfall in the protection afforded to the
confidentiality of the
mediation process should be remedied by the recognition of a new common law privilege, tailored to this new dispute resolution
mediation process should be remedied
by the recognition of a new common law privilege, tailored to this new dispute resolution process.
Ernest Guiste had argued that his use of profanity during a
mediation session in a sexual harassment case should have been protected
by a
confidentiality agreement signed
by both parties ahead of the meeting.
The parties had entered into a
mediation agreement that contained standard
confidentiality clauses and a provision that any settlement reached in the
mediation would not be binding until it had been reduced to writing and signed
by, or on behalf of, the parties.
There is a widespread concern that if the
confidentiality which surrounds the
mediation process is limited to that conferred
by the without prejudice principle, and if attempts to widen it
by contract are likely to be ineffective, then
mediation will lose one of its main attractions as a dispute resolution process.
Thus far, the existence of a
mediation contract requiring
confidentiality has not succeeded in affording any wider protection than that afforded
by the without prejudice principle, albeit that a contractual remedy may afford a secure basis for the obtaining of an injunction to restrain a threatened breach of that
confidentiality: see Venture Investment Placement Ltd v Hall [2005] EWHC 1227 (Ch), [2005] All ER (D) 224 (May) and David Instance v Denny Brothers Printing Ltd [2000] FSR 869.
Mediators breathed a collective sigh of relief when the Ontario Divisional Court upheld the
confidentiality of
mediations by refusing to compel a mediator to testify about communications between parties at a
mediation.
I am sure that
confidentiality will, and should, never be used to conceal wrongdoing
by a mediator, but short of this it is hard to see why a mediator should not receive the benefit of acting confidentially in that sensitive role as much as the parties, remembering that there are two levels of
confidentiality operating at a
mediation offered for the benefit of the parties — overall
confidentiality of the process, and
confidentiality of private meetings with each party during the process.
If the decision not to use
mediation was based on the assumption that
mediation would cloak the matter in
confidentiality and thereby disadvantage certain parties then it may be helpful to point out that
mediation is confidential
by default.
Chapter 1: Expanding Your Practice
by Representing Clients in
Mediation Chapter 2: Family Lawyer as Dispute Resolution Manager Chapter 3:
Mediation Confidentiality Chapter 4: Representing Clients in Court - Ordered
Mediation Chapter 5: Using a Limited Scope Approach (Unbundling) to Represent Clients Outside and Inside the
Mediation Room Chapter 6: Representing Clients in
Mediation with a Collaborative Lawyering Approach Chapter 7: Setting Up the
Mediation Chapter 8: Building an Agreement Your Client Can Live With Chapter 9: Reaching Agreement Chapter 10: Reviewing and Drafting Mediated Agreements Chapter 11: Preventing Future Conflict Chapter 12: Be a Peacemaker
It appears that the ENE process is an ADR hybrid which combines certain elements both of
mediation (for example, private caucusing with the parties,
confidentiality, informal presentations, settlement objectives) and non-binding arbitration (e.g., the parties and attorneys shall receive a «non-binding evaluation of the matters in controversy
by an evaluator»... in other words, an evaluation which measures and grades the relative strengths and weaknesses of each party's case).
While
mediation is normally associated with resolving a partnership dispute after the retirement or expulsion of a partner, its unique process driven
by confidentiality and the desire to facilitate rather than impose a solution, means that it can offer solutions to partnership problems at a much early stage.
Confidentiality should not be construed to limit or prohibit the effective monitoring, research, evaluation or monitoring of
mediation programs
by responsible individuals or academic institutions provided that no identifying information about any person involved in the
mediation is disclosed without their prior written consent.
This
confidentiality is protected by the Florida Mediation Confidentiality and Privilege Act (Florida Statutes § § 44
confidentiality is protected
by the Florida
Mediation Confidentiality and Privilege Act (Florida Statutes § § 44
Confidentiality and Privilege Act (Florida Statutes § § 44.401 - 44.406).
STANDARD VII: A professional family mediator shall maintain the
confidentiality of all information acquired in the
mediation process, unless the mediator is required to reveal the information
by law or permitted to reveal the information
by agreement of the participants.
In fact, one of the standards of divorce
mediation states that a mediator should maintain the
confidentiality of all information revealed during the process unless obligated
by law or unless given permission
by both parties.
A family mediator should include in the Agreement - to - Mediate contract an exception to
confidentiality that allows the mediator to disclose information communicated during
mediation about a threat of harm to self or others, or if a claim is brought against the mediator
by a client.
Answers may be specific or hypothetical, as determined
by the circumstances and the
confidentiality of
mediation.
protect the
mediation's
confidentiality by resisting subpoenas or third party's (including lawyer's) efforts to compel the mediator's testimony or disclosure of
mediation discussions.
Chapter 1: Expanding Your Practice
by Representing Clients in
Mediation Chapter 2: Family Lawyer as Dispute Resolution Manager Chapter 3:
Mediation Confidentiality Chapter 4: Representing Clients in Court - Ordered
Mediation Chapter 5: Using a Limited Scope Approach (Unbundling) to Represent Clients Outside and Inside the
Mediation Room Chapter 6: Representing Clients in
Mediation with a Collaborative Lawyering Approach Chapter 7: Setting Up the
Mediation Chapter 8: Building an Agreement Your Client Can Live With Chapter 9: Reaching Agreement Chapter 10: Reviewing and Drafting Mediated Agreements Chapter 11: Preventing Future Conflict Chapter 12: Be a Peacemaker
Mediation Rule 10.360 Confidentiality — A mediator shall maintain confidentiality of all information revealed during mediation except where disclosure is required or permitted by law or is agreed to by all
Mediation Rule 10.360
Confidentiality — A mediator shall maintain confidentiality of all information revealed during mediation except where disclosure is required or permitted by law or is agreed to
Confidentiality — A mediator shall maintain
confidentiality of all information revealed during mediation except where disclosure is required or permitted by law or is agreed to
confidentiality of all information revealed during
mediation except where disclosure is required or permitted by law or is agreed to by all
mediation except where disclosure is required or permitted
by law or is agreed to
by all parties.