Sentences with phrase «meet spending requirements on»

@Linda - I'd eventually get both, but start with the one which you can more easily meet the spending requirement on.

If you're lucky enough to be targeted, you can get an absolutely massive 250K bonus American Express Membership Rewards points for meeting spend requirements on a Business Amex Platinum card.

«This problem is exacerbated when applying for multiple cards, because you have to meet the spend requirement on each card,» he says.

Using $ 10k on other credit card offers would help me meet any spending requirement on new offers.

Couldn't you meet your spending requirement on these cards by purchasing $ 2,000 each through the Rapid Rewards shopping site at merchants that give at least 2 points per dollar?

You want to meet spending requirement on January 2015 statement or later.

We do try to do all our spending on cards we're trying to meet a spend requirement on, but we don't spend all that much money either.

That's important because you could take that extra money and nearly meet the spending requirement on a second card that earns ThankYou Points, the Citi ThankYou ® Premier Card.

Currently meeting the spending requirement on the Arrival card gets one over $ 500 in free travel including paying award taxes and -LSB-...]

Use holiday shopping to meet spending requirement on a new rewards card.

Not exact matches

Once you have met the spend requirement for the one - time $ 1,000 cash back bonus, you will be notified on your credit card statement; and the $ 1,000 cash back bonus will be paid to your account within 12 — 16 weeks.

If you are employed by a not - for - profit organization, any time you spend on religious instruction, worship services, or any form of proselytizing may not be counted toward meeting the full - time employment requirement.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The Republican leader sent a letter to de Blasio on Monday, claiming the city has failed to meet a state requirement by filling out a form that shows, building by building, how schools spend local, state and federal tax dollars.

The court said lawmakers could not rely on the local spending to meet state requirements for school budgets, the strategy lawmakers used last year.

In March, the Kansas Supreme Court also found that the state was failing to meet these constitutional requirements and ordered lawmakers to devise a new funding formula to increase government spending on the state's public education system.

However, as the District «closes the books» on the 2016 - 17 school year in the coming months, program spending overages and a decrease in revenue could jeopardize the District's ability to meet the board's mandate, or possibly even the state requirement.

The teachers» union contract signed last year required teachers to spend 40 minutes each week on activities like meeting with, writing to or calling parents, replacing a requirement that they spend that time tutoring after school.

Spend $ 3,000 - $ 4,000 on purchases within three months of account opening to meet the minimum spending requirements and get the signup bonus.

Making a lump payment towards your loans can solve the problem of having to meet a spending requirement, but you have to be mindful of the interest you're going to pay on the balance.

After you meet the minimum spending requirement, you'd have at least 46,000 miles to use on travel.

You don't meet the spending requirements for the Chase Sapphire Preferred ® Card, or you want to have multiple authorized users on your account

Once you meet the requirements for the bonus perk being offered, you simply need to make sure that you spend $ 72 dollars in the first six month of opening the account and you will receive up to 22,000 miles to be used on any American Airlines flight.

According to an article on MSNBC, the only way for Citi cardholders to avoid the current round of interest rate hike is to meet the monthly spending requirement, as much as $ 750 / month in some cases, imposed by the nation's second largest credit card issuers.

The sign - up bonus on the Starwood Preferred Guest Card from American Express card (personal and small business) has increased to 30,000 Starwood points after meeting minimum spending requirements.

Keep in mind the bonus points will post to your account on your billing statement following when you meet the minimum spending requirements.

Some cards also offer a 0 % Introductory APR on balance transfers for a specified period of time, rewards, a rewards bonus offer if you qualify and if you meet the spend requirements or a variety of other perks.

Even 2 or 3 well chosen cards can get you over a hundred thousand miles and points, so it may make sense to divert a little of your spending to meet the minimum spending requirements on a few credit cards.

This is a great way to help meet the minimum spending requirement on ANY credit card, or even for earning miles and points for transactions which don't usually earn miles and points as long as you buy Vanilla Reload cards with your credit card at Office Depot and load them on your Bluebird card.

With this card, you no longer have to worry about which cards to use for which type of expenditures or how much to spend on each card to meet various requirements.

Through April 5, 2017, the sign - up bonus on the AMEX Starwood personal and small business cards has increased to a total of 35,000 Starwood points after meeting tiered minimum spending requirements.

While globally financial institutions (FIs) are working to meet regulatory requirements, it's demanding an unprecedented spend on human resources and technology.

Assuming you aren't meeting any of the minimum spend requirements on the Platinum Delta SkyMiles ® Business Credit Card, the net rewards in the first two years of membership would yield you $ 295 for the Gold Delta SkyMiles ® Business Credit Card and merely $ 65 for the Platinum Delta SkyMiles ® Business Credit Card.

If you ever want to make a large purchase on a credit card or you want to meet a spending requirement for a credit card bonus, but you don't want to be hurt by the high credit utilization, use this simple trick.

This service can be useful to meet minimum spending requirements to earn the sign - up bonus on a new credit card.

Given that an average person spends about S$ 600 on food and S$ 400 on transportation, we don't think it'll be too difficult to meet this requirement for an average spender.

after meeting the minimum spending requirements on both the personal and small business versions of the AMEX Platinum Delta card.

However, it can be useful to meet the minimum spending requirement on a credit card or to achieve a certain level of spending on a card.

Once you have met the spend requirement for the one - time $ 1,000 cash back bonus, you will be notified on your credit card statement; and the $ 1,000 cash back bonus will be paid to your account within 12 — 16 weeks.

If you're taking on a new credit card to get the sign - up bonus make sure you'll be able to easily meet the minimum spending requirements.

If you think you'll be spending at least $ 1,000 over your everyday budget, this is a good time to consider applying for a new credit card and using these expenses to meet the minimum spending requirement on a new card.

There are lots of different ways you could meet your minimum spend requirements on those cards.

If it looks like you can meet the spending requirements without overextending yourself, then you can move on to the next step.

If you are employed by a not - for - profit organization, any time you spend on religious instruction, worship services, or any form of proselytizing may not be counted toward meeting the full - time employment requirement.

Most animals are genetically wired to spend a certain amount of time on activities that meet their requirements for survival.

Whether it's worth it for you depends on how highly you value the points or miles you're manufacturing, and whether you are using this technique to meet minimum spending requirements you can't meet with your everyday purchases.

With a 40,000 points signup bonus after earning at least a point per dollar meeting the $ 3,000 minimum spend requirement on Chase Sapphire Preferred, it appeared that earning the 44,000 points needed for two (more) nights in the best Hyatt properties was doable.

Because you'll earn at least 1 mile per dollar in meeting the minimum spend requirement and because you earn 10 % of your miles back on redemptions, you'd actually end up with enough miles for a free one - way flight in the US and Canada after redeeming for a roundtrip to Europe.

Because the sign - up bonus nets cardholders 40,000 points ($ 400) and because cardholders earn 2x points on all purchases, they'll start with a minimum of 42,000 points after meeting the minimum spend requirement.

Unless you're meeting a minimum spending requirement or have a specific redemption in mind, I think 2 % cash back is worth more than a dollar of non-bonused spending on virtually any other card.