Sentences with phrase «meet the spending requirements of»

In order to earn the sign - up bonus, you usually have to meet a spending requirement of some sort — spending a certain amount in a specified amount of time, making a certain number of purchases or making at least one purchase with the card.

If you meet the spending requirement of $ 3,000 in the first three months, you'll be able to collect those points, which translates to roughly $ 250 in travel.

Purchases to meet the spend requirement of this offer do NOT include fees or interest charges, balance transfers, cash advances, purchase of travelers checks, purchase or reloading of prepaid cards, or other cash equivalents.

Not exact matches

In order to qualify for the Relationship Rate for Standard Savings, you must have a linked Standard Checking, Performance Checking, Virtual Wallet ® with Performance Spend, Performance Select Checking or Virtual Wallet with Performance Select and meet any one of the following requirements:

I've structured the figures to allow me to say at this point, «What I'm excited about is this: the machine that meets all your minimum requirements involves an investment of only $ 10,000 — substantially less than the amount you're prepared to spend.»

In order to qualify for a Relationship Rate for Premiere Money Market, you must have a linked checking account (for the Performance Checking Relationship Rate, you must have a linked Performance Checking or Virtual Wallet ® with Performance Spend; for the Performance Select Checking Relationship Rate, you must have a linked Performance Select Checking or Virtual Wallet with Performance Select) and meet one of the following requirements:

If you are employed by a not - for - profit organization, any time you spend on religious instruction, worship services, or any form of proselytizing may not be counted toward meeting the full - time employment requirement.

And some credit cards offer a sign - up bonus that gives you extra rewards for meeting a minimum spending requirement within the first three months of opening a credit card account.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

«The budget includes the flexibility to react to needs that emerge during the fiscal year, and every dollar of spending must meet the statutory and program requirements established within appropriation language and be subject to a rigorous agency review process,» said Morris Peters, a spokesman for Gov. Andrew Cuomo's budget office.

Marty Connor, an election lawyer and the former leader of the State Senate Democrats, pulled Teachout's voting records and spent Friday and Saturday sharing them with journalists, noting that she claimed to be a permanently disabled voter (this lets her vote by absentee ballot), had no record of voting in New York in 2011 or 2013 and questioned whether she met the five - year residency requirement to be governor.

The council can only meet the legal requirement to balance its budget by raiding # 3milion from its reserves while carrying out a raft of mid-year spending cuts, including cutting personal budgets for adult care users by a fifth and targeting high - cost adult care packages for reductions (appendices 4 and 5, pages 12 - 13).

... According to court documents, Christie's budget fails to meet the funding requirements set forth by the School Funding Reform Act of 2008, a spending formula that guarantees financial support for all New Jersey public school districts.

Anyway, spending time surfing such dating services and trying to find a person who will meet your requirements, brings a lot of fun and excitement.

A review of who is paying state education agency (SEA) salaries suggests that many employees within these bureaucracies have competing priorities — and may have to spend more time meeting federal requirements than serving the students in their states.

For new regulations to help disadvantaged students and meet Congress's presumed intent of changing the SNS rule to drive more effective Title I spending, the Department should strike the requirements of equalized spending and sufficient funding of the basic educational program.

Spend $ 3,000 - $ 4,000 on purchases within three months of account opening to meet the minimum spending requirements and get the signup bonus.

Additionally, you can qualify for a signup bonus after spending $ 2,500 within the first 3 months of opening your account — if you meet this requirement you earn 20,000 bonus points.

The lower your monthly expenses are, the longer it takes to meet minimum spending requirements of multiple credit cards.

This is important, since to get a signup bonus, you need to meet the minimum spending requirement of $ 3,000 - $ 4,000 within, normally, three months of account opening.

Making a lump payment towards your loans can solve the problem of having to meet a spending requirement, but you have to be mindful of the interest you're going to pay on the balance.

There are a few people out there who would buy a policy to show proof and then immediately cancel it because they don't want to spend ten or fifteen dollars a month meeting the requirements of their lease.

Something else you might see as a drawback is the absence of a one - time cash bonus offer for eligible new Cardmembers who meet the spend requirements.

Once you meet the requirements for the bonus perk being offered, you simply need to make sure that you spend $ 72 dollars in the first six month of opening the account and you will receive up to 22,000 miles to be used on any American Airlines flight.

The Aer Lingus Visa Signature ® Card also features a number of first - year spending bonuses that can be extremely valuable for travelers who can meet the requirements.

According to an article on MSNBC, the only way for Citi cardholders to avoid the current round of interest rate hike is to meet the monthly spending requirement, as much as $ 750 / month in some cases, imposed by the nation's second largest credit card issuers.

Spend $ 3,000 within three months of account opening to meet the minimum spending requirement and get an 80,000 - point signup bonus.

After taking into account the convenience fee, about the only time I can think of that purchasing crypto with a credit card could be a «good deal» is when your crypto purchase is enabling you to meet the initial spending bonus requirement for a new card.

So you'll earn 45,000 Wyndham points (worth 3 nights at any Wyndham hotel) after meeting minimum spending requirements with the premium version of the Barclaycard Wyndham Rewards card.

Plus, enjoy a one - time signup bonus for meeting the minimum spending requirement within the first 90 days of account opening.

Several cash - back cards offer rewards of $ 150 to $ 200 once you spend a certain amount within the first few months, and you would meet that requirement easily with your ticket purchases.

With the no - annual - fee version of the Barclaycard Wyndham Rewards card you can earn 18,000 Wyndham points (worth 1 nights at any Wyndham hotel) after meeting minimum spending requirements.

The Free Rewards Checking account offers an exceptionally high annual percentage yield of at least 3.09 % for balances of up to $ 10,000, as long as you're able to meet a few spending and online banking requirements.

Some cards also offer a 0 % Introductory APR on balance transfers for a specified period of time, rewards, a rewards bonus offer if you qualify and if you meet the spend requirements or a variety of other perks.

Even 2 or 3 well chosen cards can get you over a hundred thousand miles and points, so it may make sense to divert a little of your spending to meet the minimum spending requirements on a few credit cards.

While it lacks a large introductory bonus that some of the top travel cards have, it offers unique annual loyalty bonuses for cardholders who meet the spending requirements.

The extra effort is more than worth it since it can save you the difficulty of meeting minimum spending requirements and help stop you from overspending to meet those requirements.

Generally, once the spending requirement is met, sign - up bonuses are posted to the account at the end of the statement cycle.

While many cards offer bonuses for eligible new Cardmembers who meet specific spend requirements within a set period of time after account opening, the Citi ® Double Cash Card — 18 month BT offer does not.

With this card, you no longer have to worry about which cards to use for which type of expenditures or how much to spend on each card to meet various requirements.

Through April 5, 2017, the sign - up bonus on the AMEX Starwood personal and small business cards has increased to a total of 35,000 Starwood points after meeting tiered minimum spending requirements.

The feature grants additional miles and MQMs to users who meet the minimum spending requirements, which come in two increments of $ 30,000 — for a total of $ 60,000 — in one calendar year.

Spend $ 3,000 within three months of account opening to meet the minimum spending requirement and get the signup bonus.

Previous sign - up bonuses between 15,000 and 75,000 points were given after cardholders met the minimum spend requirement within their first 3 months of having the card.

Assuming you aren't meeting any of the minimum spend requirements on the Platinum Delta SkyMiles ® Business Credit Card, the net rewards in the first two years of membership would yield you $ 295 for the Gold Delta SkyMiles ® Business Credit Card and merely $ 65 for the Platinum Delta SkyMiles ® Business Credit Card.

One advantage of the REI Credit Card bonus is the fact that it doesn't require you to meet any minimum spending requirements.

And if you use Plastiq to meet this spending requirement, you'll pay a minimum of $ 1,250 in fees.

Because if you get the personal or small business version of the AMEX Platinum Delta card and spend $ 50,000 + in a calendar year, not only will you get 70,000 Delta miles and 10,000 Medallion qualification miles for meeting the minimum spending requirements.

The biggest draw here is the 100,000 points you'll earn for meeting the spending requirement — a significant increase both over the standard offer of 50,000 points and the previous increased sign - up bonuses 80,000 points (with a lower minimum spend).

For example, you could book three nights at a Category 8 property like the St. Ermin's Hotel, Autograph Collection in London for a total of 105,000 points (at a rate of 35,000 points per night when booked at the PointSavers level; you'd earn that extra 5,000 points by meeting the minimum spending requirement of $ 5,000) in late September, when rooms start at about 227 GBP ($ 331) per night.