Sentences with phrase «meeting of minds»

There, they shared one side of a booth and had a meeting of the minds and discussed everything from how they have gotten to where they were currently in life and where they see themselves going next.

We shared one side of a booth, and had a meeting of the minds over cheap burritos and nachos & cheese.

Truly it all comes down to a «meeting of the minds» of those involved.

That's why Miller says you should kick off your 2014 accountability revolution with a meeting of the minds.

It is ALL about that old expression: the meeting of the minds.

There are currently dozens of proposals on the table, and a meeting of the minds recently concluded in Washington.

Have a meeting of the minds.

The court found that this evidence could support the jury's conclusion that there was a meeting of the minds and thus a contract between the parties.

If more agents were to educate their buyers better, the «meeting of the minds» would go smoother.

Once upon a time, our main function was to facillitate the «meeting of the minds» and close the deal!

Market value is the price the house will bring at a given point in time, once the buyer and seller establish a «meeting of the minds» on price.

Check out this Financial Freedom Friday meeting of the minds with Josh Miller, an Epic investor on his way real freedom with the help of the REI Ace Badass Investor Program.

Fogel v. Rob Realty (204 A.D. 2d 135) verdict in favor of broker affirmed, broker produced buyer ready, willing and able; testimony of broker and employee was sufficient to show meeting of minds concerning price and financing terms.

Corp. (204 A.D. 2d 601) judgment dismissing complaint affirmed, contracts of sale conditioned upon buyers approval of changes to rider which required letter from Town Planning Bd.; seller's failure to obtain letter is not evidence of bad faith, even if letter produced, it would not have effectuated meeting of minds on all essential & customary terms.

Robison v. Sweeney (301 A.D. 2d 815)-- broker's right to a commission is not dependent upon the execution of a legally enforceable contract, so long as the seller and buyer have come to a meeting of the minds on the essential terms of the transaction; summary judgment for broker reversed where there are questions of fact as to whether there was a meeting of the minds between the buyer and the seller regarding the essential terms of the contract.

M.A. Salazar, Inc. v. Levy (237 A.D. 2d 583)- summary judgment granted dismissing broker's complaint for brokerage commission; broker fails to allege that the parties agreed on terms customarily encountered in a real estate transaction and in the absence of such agreement on essential terms, the broker did not earn commission; mere agreement as to price on a proposed sale does not constitute a meeting of the minds of buyer and seller and therefore broker is not procuring cause.

Finely v. Amyot (285 A.D. 2d 946)- non jury trial judgment dismissing broker's complaint affirmed; mere introduction of the property to the ultimate purchaser is insufficient to make out a case for a commission; where broker's listing agreement expired but the seller and broker agreed that broker would continue his efforts to show the seller's property, the broker must be the procuring cause of the sale; broker is not the procuring cause where he merely introduced the ultimate purchaser to the property and severed his relationship with the seller at the initial showing, thereby abandoning efforts to bring about a meeting of the minds between the parties

J. Grotto & Assoc., Inc. v. Hiro Real Estate Co. (271 A.D. 2d 360)- broker fails to demonstrate entitlement to a commission where there is no meeting of the minds; counter-offer by proposed tenant to owner's proposed lease terms operated to terminate owner's original offer and rendered any subsequent acceptance of the original offer inoperative; broker may not recover in quantum meruit where owner not unjustly enriched by broker's services

Broker earned commission upon producing ready, willing and able purchaser - a meeting of the minds on all essential terms.

Heelan Realty and Development Corp. v. Ocskasy (27 A.D. 3d 620)- broker's claim dismissed; although testimony supported conclusion that the contractional relationship of the parties continued beyond the expiration date of the written listing agreement, the broker failed to present legally sufficient evidence of its entitlement to payment of a brokerage commission; prospective buyer's principal testified that buyer was not advised regarding the environmental contamination and subsequent remediation of the property, that regulatory approvals of the clean up work had not been obtained and was unable to state that the prospective buyer would have consummated the purchase had it been aware of the contamination issues; broker failed to establish that buyer was ready, willing and able to purchase the property and that there was a meeting of the minds between the buyer and the seller

Hill Realty Services v. Cummings (244 A.D. 2d 525)-- owner's cross-motion for summary judgment granted and affirmed where broker produced two purchasers for owner's property but there was never a meeting of the minds as to several material terms of the sale; broker failed to proffer evidence raising a triable issue of fact as to allegations of seller's bad faith.

Jacob v. O'Brien (252 A.D. 2d 515)- summary judgment dismissing broker's complaint affirmed; owner's proof sufficient to make out a prima facie case that there was no meeting of the minds as to the sale of owner's residence.

Norma Reynolds Realty, Inc. v. Miral (301 A.D. 2d 364)-- mere agreement as to price on a proposed sale of real property does not constitute a meeting of the minds of vendor and vendee so as to entitle the real estate broker to commissions; there was no meeting of the minds as to other terms customarily contained in an agreement for the sale of real property, such as a contract date, whether the premises were to be sold in «as is» condition and when the closing was to take place.

Realty Investors of USA, Inc. v. Bhaidaswala (254 A.D. 2d 603)- order dismissing broker's complaint reversed; listing agreement entitling broker to a commission in the event that broker procures a purchaser on terms specified therein or any other terms acceptable to owner not dependent upon the execution of a legally enforceable sales contract, so long as the seller and buyer have come to a meeting of the minds on the essential terms of the transaction.

Interactive Properties Corp. v. Morris (271 A.D. 2d 339)- motion for summary judgment dismissing broker's complaint affirmed; mere introduction to property does not rise to the level of procuring cause; another broker was the procuring cause where it introduced the tenant to the space in question, took tenant to see the space, submitted the tenant's offer to the building owner, negotiated the terms of the lease and otherwise brought about a meeting of the minds between tenant and owner

Moore & Moore Real Estate v. Aloi (234 A.D. 2d 683)- non-jury trial judgment dismissing broker's complaint affirmed; broker not entitled to selling broker's commission pursuant to multiple listing agreement offering commission to broker who is the procuring cause where there was no meeting of the minds between buyer and seller as to material issue (closing date); no credible evidence that sellers acted in bad faith; no evidence that purchaser had financial availability to complete the transaction.

Fried v. David Berry Realty (17 A.D. 3d 405) brokerage agreement entitled broker to a commission when there is a meeting of the minds and a tenant was procured who was ready willing and able to lease upon the owner's terms; lease procured directly by owner conditioned lease upon obtaining operating certificates from the New York State Department of Health and the New York State Office of Mental Health; there was nothing in the record to indicate that approval by NYSOMH, which was denied, was a «term» imposed by owners and therefore triable issues of fact exist as to whether the broker's commission was earned.

According to the case law as of the date of this article, there is no contract because there was never a meeting of the minds of the parties as to the particular property being bought and sold.

His sole objective is «to broker a deal, to bring the parties together and achieve a meeting of minds».

Not only does this provide housing, it also protects property owners: «This is a way for property owners in these areas to achieve a «meeting of minds» with their prospective tenants and achieve much higher occupancy levels, while the tenants get the clean, safe and secure accommodation they want at an affordable price.

Don't miss your chance to participate in this high - level meeting of the minds.

The court found that under the circumstances, there was no meeting of the minds and no intent to form a contract.

(2) That there was no meeting of the minds as to what issue was submitted to the arbitrators.

I'm trying to find a buyer, however if this is my first time speaking with them, I will ask them about their real estate experience, if they understand about assignments, if they understand that I'm wholesaling the property, and basically have a meeting of the minds about what my intentions are and If I can answer any questions for them.

We had been «threatened» outrightly against having those sorts of meetings and or even that we should not discuss such a topic over coffee, agent to agent, never mind agency to agency — even in the effort to just reach a «meeting of the minds.»

The trial court had ruled that there had not been a «meeting of the minds» between the Buyers and the Brokerage on the listing agreement terms and so there was no contract between them.

If you look at the requirements for a contract you'll see that the parties must have a «meeting of the minds» that neither has an undue advantage, etc..

I think you raise an important point about a meeting of the minds.

The only question remaining is how badly do they want it and what does it take to achieve a meeting of minds?

In case of a dispute, money held in a Realtor's trust account is «frozen» until a meeting of the minds of the parties is achieved for its disposition.

His sole objective is to broker a deal, to bring the parties together and to achieve a meeting of minds.

With the advent of single agency, the confrontational concepts of «personal representation» and «advocacy» resulted in many offer presentations degenerating into legalistic free - for - alls, or knock - down, drag - out street fights, placing artificial difficulties into the way of achieving a meeting of minds.

(Almost guaranteed to keep everyone sane and on their best behaviour if that was ever in question)... I was merely the «monitor,» at the meeting of the minds.

I would even question if when a buyer doesn't have representation and Full Agency Disclosure, if a Purchase and Sale Agreement is legally binding — from a «meeting of the minds» perspective!

Risk tolerance, age, strength of current occupation, potential pension, funds available, reserves, meeting of the minds with any significant other, big expenses in future (college maybe for kids), retirement needs, etc..

The fair market value, or worth, is established when «a meeting of the minds» between you and the buyer takes place.

Equally important is to be assertive and passionate about staying on track toward getting a «meeting of the minds» and a fair deal done for both the buyer and seller.

Again, this raises the issue of the words used in the document and the purpose and intent of the parties being «ad idem», or a meeting of the minds.

I'd like to attend virtually, but would just sit in on the «meeting of the minds» if that's ok.

No matter what commission structure is the topic of the day, or what promises are made, the starting point of any transaction is if there is a meeting of the minds of the members of the public with the representative about to be hired.