Sentences with phrase «meeting system performance»

Its solutions are targeted at applications where memory plays a key role in meeting system performance requirements.

Not exact matches

Adopt a comprehensive firm - wide performance appraisal system for formal appraisals and complement that with regular informal face - to - face meetings.

Carlson also tells a jaw - dropping anecdote to illustrate Mayer's occasional tone - deafness: After upsetting employees with a number of new H.R. policies, including a widely hated performance review system, Mayer held a town - hall meeting to address their concerns.

Other groups have also put forth proposals on self - driving cars, including requiring the vehicles and even semi-automated systems to meet performance targets, greater transparency and data from makers and operators of the vehicles, increased regulatory oversight, and better monitoring of and engagement with human drivers.

Because of this understanding, we are dedicated to ensuring that Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and System Integrators are well - cared for and that delivered solutions» performance meet customer's expectations.

«We're going to continue [to] improve our manufacturing performance,» he says, noting that its recent additions also included a laser jet cutting system, which allows it to optimize the number of pieces cut per sheet and ensures the pieces meet specifications.

A multihead weigher from Ishida's new high performance RV range, adapted specifically to handle dates, is combined with one of a choice of weigher - to - pack distribution systems, specially selected to meet market - standard pack formats.

To meet the demand for organic - certified products, we've redesigned our top Key Dairy Program products to offer a complete line of certified organic products designed to enhance production efficiency and performance of dairy cattle in organic production systems.

Each kind of stroller: travel system, light weight, and full size stroller should meet a certain level of performance to accommodate the needs for which you are buying.

Hiden Analytical is committed to providing systems which meet specifications of both new and existing clients, but further, enable the advancement of their work, whether it be pure research or the improvements or monitoring of products and process performance.

So, if you want to take advantage of them, you need to become a member on BiCupid.com, because you won't find the following features anywhere else: • The site is supported by the LGBT community, which means that it is genuine; • It has a reliable safety system that keeps its members away from the risks of online dating; • The site is free of ads, which is quite a performance and incredible convenience considering that many other dating sites are filled with bothering ads; • It is popular throughout the world, allowing you to meet bisexuals from all corners of the world; • It has a very wide reach, its members database containing persons of all nations, ages, and sexes;

While certification can serve to screen out aspirants who fail to meet a minimal performance standard, our current system is not designed to do so.

First, it advances specific ideas for how state accountability systems can be redesigned to demand strong performance and growth from high - achieving students while meeting the requirements set forth in ESSA.

This program may yet lift the performance of our pupils as they go through the school system, although problems remain: out of Australia's total expenditure on early childhood education in 2010, parents contributed almost half the cost and only 56 per cent was met from the public purse — compared with an OECD average of 82 per cent public funding — and the rest was from private sources, probably parental pockets.

Pursuing an instructional design bachelor degree can give eLearning professionals the knowledge and skills they need to design eLearning courses that meet performance and learning objectives by effectively using eLearning authoring tools, learning management systems, and instructional design theories and models.

The papers, slated to be made public early next month, define charter districts as systems of autonomous schools that are given regulatory freedom in exchange for meeting performance standards specified either in contracts or charters.

With the emphasis on high - stakes testing, we have learned a great deal about who is succeeding and failing, and which schools and school systems are meeting targeted performance standards.

The curriculum study group of the National Association of State Boards of Education urged in a report that policymakers replace the units with systems that require students to meet defined performance standards.

To create such programs, states and districts must identify the most important elements of student performance (usually academic achievement), measure them (usually with state tests), calculate change in performance on a school - by - school basis, and provide rewards to schools that meet or beat performance improvement targets — all of which must be backed by system supports that enable all schools to boost results.

The authors collected results from MET researchers around the country into a volume that will help school districts implement new evaluation systems that will enhance teacher performance and student achievement.

Curricula, teaching methods, and schedules can all be customized to meet the learning styles and life situations of individual students; education can be freed from the geographic constraints of districts and brick - and - mortar buildings; coursework from the most remedial to the most advanced can be made available to everyone; students can have more interaction with teachers and one another; parents can readily be included in the education process; sophisticated data systems can measure and guide performance; and schools can be operated at lower cost with technology (which is relatively cheap) substituted for labor (which is relatively expensive).

Unlike most private schools, however, they are required to participate in state testing systems and can be closed by their authorizers if they fail to meet performance goals.

According to the theory, when new innovations are still stretching to meet our expectations, the best strategy for pushing a product's performance forward is for a single entity to control all the interdependent pieces of the solution (e.g. the processor, screen, memory, and operating system) that affect performance.

This article should have made a distinction between SchoolNet, an online instructional - management system that gives administrators, teachers, and parents access to student - level data, and SchoolStat, a performance - management system designed by the University of Pennsylvania's Fels Institute of Government that involves monthly data - review meetings among administrators districtwide.

(i) Conduct a self - assessment that evaluates the program's progress towards meeting goals established under paragraph (a) of this section, using aggregated child assessment data where applicable, compliance with program performance standards throughout the program year, and the effectiveness of the professional development and family engagement systems in promoting school readiness, using classroom, professional development, and parent and family engagement data, as appropriate;

ESSA provides an exciting opportunity for California to have a single, comprehensive accountability system based on performance, equity, and improvement that would meet both state and federal requirements.

This means state accountability systems must also be aligned to individual teacher's classroom goals: Help all students meet proficient or higher performance; help all students make significant progress from wherever they were performing in the prior year; and pay laser - like attention to ensuring struggling students are on track to reach proficiency.

The House education committee met Wednesday to discuss substituted changes to HB 5223 and HB 5224 designed to implement a new teacher evaluation system that for the first time would include student growth in rating a teacher's performance.

The system uses four integrated elements — performance standards, performance monitoring, performance feedback and systematic training — to mobilize others, maximize service and meet goals and objectives.

Superintendents acknowledge that federal and state standards and accountability systems have created a situation in which district and school personnel can not ignore evidence about students who are struggling or failing to meet mandated standards for academic performance, as reflected in test results and other indicators of student success (e.g., attendance, graduation rates).

These systems also require that all teachers and principals receive robust, timely, and meaningful feedback on their performance and support in order to inform and improve instruction so that all students meet the expectations of new CCR standards.

Federal law in postsecondary education must also be a robust source of support for local innovation, research, and implementation of strategies designed to improve teacher and principal effectiveness and include: Evidence - based preparation and professional development; Evidence - based evaluation systems that include, in part, student performance; Alternative certification programs that meet workforce needs; State and school district flexibility regarding credentials for small and / or rural schools, special education programs, English learners and specialized programs such as science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics; and Locally - determined compensation and teacher and principal assignment policies.

The assessment system, known as IMPACT, that was introduced by Rhee and continued by Henderson, drew serious concerns from teachers and principals, who found it unworkable and unfair, with performance goals that were impossible to meet and metrics that were questionable.

Tacoma's schools still must meet the performance targets — and bear the consequences — of Washington state's federally mandated accountability system.

The NYS Charter Schools Act of 1998 was created for the following purposes: • Improve student learning and achievement; • Increase learning opportunities for all students, with special emphasis on expanded learning experiences for students who are at - risk of academic failure; • Encourage the use of different and innovative teaching methods; • Create new professional opportunities for teachers, school administrators and other school personnel; • Provide parents and students with expanded choices in the types of educational opportunities that are available within the public school system; and • Provide schools with a method to change from rule - based to performance - based accountability systems by holding the schools established under this article accountable for meeting measurable student achievement results.

Schools and districts, in developing and refining the professional development system, shall also review and monitor school discipline data; school environment surveys; assessments of parental satisfaction; performance appraisal data of teachers, managers, and administrative personnel; and other performance indicators to identify school and student needs that can be met by improved professional performance.

Jennifer Imazeki of San Diego State University analyzes recent performance trends in California's education system in Meeting the Challenge: Performance Trends in California Schools, a new PACE Poperformance trends in California's education system in Meeting the Challenge: Performance Trends in California Schools, a new PACE PoPerformance Trends in California Schools, a new PACE Policy Brief.

No single method, reform, or system is the» silver bullet» that can solve all educational challenges, but improved formative assessing strategies does proffer a potent means for meeting goals for high - performance, high - equity student outcomes.

Many performance based pay systems include components which allow principals to terminate teachers who continuously fail to meet goals and objectives.

A performance based pay system would keep many of the best teachers from pursuing jobs in those high risk areas because of nearly impossible odds to meet the performance measures needed to make it worth the while.

The district is proposing a four - level performance rating system — «Highly Effective,» «Effective,» «Developing» and «Ineffective» — to replace the current two - tier system of «meets standard / below standard.»

The old system ranked administrators «meets standard performance» or «below standard performance» while the new one has four evaluation levels — «highly effective,» «effective,» «developing» and «ineffective.»

It also contains a provision for a performance pay system that could add $ 20,000 to $ 30,000 to the annual salaries of educators who meet a set of criteria yet to be formally determined.

● Oversee the implementation of the educational vision across all campuses, and ensure schools are producing amazing outcomes for students ● Ensure all schools meet their academic and cultural goals ● Build a strong, collaborative team of principals ● Ensure schools are operationally strong, aesthetically beautiful and clean, within budget, and well - organized ● Oversee performance management systems and the hiring process across the schools ● Manage the college teams in supporting students as they prepare for college ● Provide individual development and management to school principals through one - on - one meetings, coaching, modeling, planning, and feedback ● Lead regular professional learning for school leaders (topics such as instructional leadership, personnel management, school operations, data analysis, school culture, and family investment) ● Study and analyze data on an ongoing basis ● Work with school principals to develop and implement action plans based on academic results

Based on students» performance, the adaptive content system automatically adjusts the text complexity to meet their evolving needs and steadily move them up, level by level

e. Any incentive for teachers included in a compensation system developed and implemented by a local school division must meet the following criteria: 1) designate incentive payments as a range or tiers for target groups, such as differentiating between the teacher of record or teachers in support positions; 2) have a maximum payment to a teacher of $ 5,000 per year; 3) prorate payments for teachers who have taught for less than a full school year; and 4) performance evaluations for participating teachers must be completed in a timeline that provides sufficient time to distribute incentive funds to teachers and submit reimbursement requests to the Department of Education no later than June 1, 2015, for the first year and June 1, 2016, for the second year.

Connecticut's Performance Evaluation Advisory Council («PEAC»), the body that oversees the teacher and principal evaluation system, will next meet in January.

In this model, states can create systems to meet the needs of their students without being permitted to hide behind average school performance.

The system involves trained teams of practicing educators from neighboring districts visiting schools throughout a district, observing to what extent the schools are meeting eight indicators of school quality — from using performance - based assessments to providing equity in student learning.

Allows states to establish their own accountability systems that must meet only three requirements: annually measure student achievement, annually assess school performance, and include a school improvement plan that contains interventions for poorly performing Title I schools.