Sentences with phrase «meeting these spending requirements at»

Not to mention you can spread your applications across several months to minimize the burden of meeting these spending requirements at once.

Not exact matches

We understand the need to grow capital at a reasonably steady pace, beating inflation and providing sustainable income to meet ever - increasing spending requirements.

I've structured the figures to allow me to say at this point, «What I'm excited about is this: the machine that meets all your minimum requirements involves an investment of only $ 10,000 — substantially less than the amount you're prepared to spend.»

Guerreiro is one left back that would meet the requirements but we would face stiff competition with Liverpool who may be looking to spend this summer for Klopp, there is no doubt that he looks like a player for the future but for the fee that he could command with popular interest, it may force Wenger to look at other opportunities and one may have dropped in his lap.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Senate Republicans have balked at the disclosure requirements and Cuomo has spent the last several days trying to reach an agreement that meets their concerns.

After meeting the minimum spending requirements for this card you'd have at least 54,000 Ultimate Rewards points.

After you meet the minimum spending requirement, you'd have at least 46,000 miles to use on travel.

You could earn enough points for 3 free nights at any Wyndham hotel from 1 card after meeting minimum spending requirements!

So you'll earn 45,000 Wyndham points (worth 3 nights at any Wyndham hotel) after meeting minimum spending requirements with the premium version of the Barclaycard Wyndham Rewards card.

With the no - annual - fee version of the Barclaycard Wyndham Rewards card you can earn 18,000 Wyndham points (worth 1 nights at any Wyndham hotel) after meeting minimum spending requirements.

The Free Rewards Checking account offers an exceptionally high annual percentage yield of at least 3.09 % for balances of up to $ 10,000, as long as you're able to meet a few spending and online banking requirements.

For the most part, the cards give you at least 3 months to meet these requirements, so you have a chance to plan your spending and get your bonus right away.

Generally, once the spending requirement is met, sign - up bonuses are posted to the account at the end of the statement cycle.

This is a great way to help meet the minimum spending requirement on ANY credit card, or even for earning miles and points for transactions which don't usually earn miles and points as long as you buy Vanilla Reload cards with your credit card at Office Depot and load them on your Bluebird card.

Between the welcome bonus and points from meeting the minimum spending requirements, you can earn at least 125,000 AMEX Membership Rewards points.

For example, you could book three nights at a Category 8 property like the St. Ermin's Hotel, Autograph Collection in London for a total of 105,000 points (at a rate of 35,000 points per night when booked at the PointSavers level; you'd earn that extra 5,000 points by meeting the minimum spending requirement of $ 5,000) in late September, when rooms start at about 227 GBP ($ 331) per night.

If you think you'll be spending at least $ 1,000 over your everyday budget, this is a good time to consider applying for a new credit card and using these expenses to meet the minimum spending requirement on a new card.

That said, I would personally operate under the assumption that as long as you meet the spend requirement and keep the card open for 6 + months, you'll not be at risk for losing any of the points or the $ 300 travel credit.

Doing so and meeting the minimum spending requirement of $ 1,000 in the first 3 months will net you at least 40,000 Southwest Rapid Rewards points.

I persuaded them to each take advantage of the two browser trick available at the time, acquiring two Citi AAdvantage cards for a grand total of 80,000 miles in sign - up bonuses and at least an additional 6,000 miles a piece in meeting minimum spend requirements.

In order to earn the sign - up bonus, you usually have to meet a spending requirement of some sort — spending a certain amount in a specified amount of time, making a certain number of purchases or making at least one purchase with the card.

Add this $ 28.40 to the remaining sign - up bonus and the $ 20 worth of credit Kevin earned meeting the minimum spend requirement, and there's at least of $ 164.40 left over.

With a 40,000 points signup bonus after earning at least a point per dollar meeting the $ 3,000 minimum spend requirement on Chase Sapphire Preferred, it appeared that earning the 44,000 points needed for two (more) nights in the best Hyatt properties was doable.

Because you'll earn at least 1 mile per dollar in meeting the minimum spend requirement and because you earn 10 % of your miles back on redemptions, you'd actually end up with enough miles for a free one - way flight in the US and Canada after redeeming for a roundtrip to Europe.

Points transfer at a 1:1 ratio, so if you were to eventually move all of your Ultimate Rewards points, you'd have a minimum of 43,000 Avios to work with given the lowest number of points you'd earn meeting the minimum spend requirement.

American Airlines, for example, offers a status challenge that is available to anyone — whether or not you already have status in a comparable program — that lets you fast - track your way to earning either AAdvantage gold or platinum status by meeting both a flying requirement of 7,000 or 12,500 miles and spending at least $ 1,000 or $ 2,000 respectively within a period of 90 days.

However, I don't advise applying for more than one card at a time, and you should be sure to meet any minimum spending requirements needed to earn the sign - up bonus before obtaining your next card.

«If they're going to take out a card, they want that card to offer at least 50,000 airline miles, and a fairly low spending requirement to be met in a reasonable period of time,» says Fishman.

So it makes no sense to register for 3 cards all at once with a minimum spend requirement of $ 10,000 within 3 - 4 months, if I know I can not meet that spending obligation.

I've been extremely careful about meeting my minimum spend requirements without really «spending» any money (like cashing out a prepaid American Express card at the ATM).

Generally, once the spending requirement is met, sign - up bonuses are posted to the account at the end of the statement cycle.

Discover has been sending out email with targeted offers similar to Amex Offers that trigger when you meet a certain spending requirement at a specific merchant.

An easy way to make your way towards that 110,000 miles is to get one of Southwest's branded credit cards and meet the minimum spend requirement to receive a hefty (usually at least 50,000) sign - up bonus.

If you have an immediate need to plan a trip to India, you may not have enough time to apply for a credit card and meet the minimum spend requirements to get the bonus miles and book an ward ticket as this process can take at least 2 months from the day you applied to miles deposited to your frequent flyer account.

You apply for two credit cards at a time, grab your 100,000 miles bonus after meeting a moderate spend requirement, and you're good to go anywhere in the world.

The sign up bonus for meeting a small minimum spend requirement is two free nights at any of their properties.

Factor in the opening bonus (it was 100k, now 50k) and you'll get at least another $ 1,000 or $ 500 in year one, assuming you meet the minimum spending requirement to unlock that sign - up bonus.

That's not to say that you should know exactly what you are going to do with these points when you sign up for the card, but since you can only sign up for a limited number of cards at a time, make sure you pick a useful one and don't spread yourself too thin in terms of meeting the spending requirements or using your rewards.

After meeting the spending requirement, you will get at least 129,000 points if you apply for both cards (most probably more if you hit some of the bonus categories).

This allows you to meet spending requirements and to earn rewards without actually spending any real money, or at least spending very little money.

You can quickly earn at least 231,500 with all of these sign - up bonuses and miles earned for meeting the spending requirements.

While the current 50,000 - point bonus for the Chase Sapphire Reserve ℠ isn't quite as lucrative as it was at launch, the card still offers a significant number of bonus points to those who can meet the spending requirement in the first 90 days.

If you think you'll be spending at least $ 1,000 over your everyday budget, this is a good time to consider applying for a new credit card and using these expenses to meet the minimum spending requirement on a new card.

Now there's a new data point from r / churning that shows that even by meeting minimum spend requirement organically, you're still at risk.

If you and your fiance get the card, you'll each have at least 53,000 points in your accounts after meeting the spend requirement.

With the annual fee version of the card, you can earn 45,000 Wyndham points (worth 3 nights at any Wyndham hotel) after meeting minimum spending requirements.

In return, you're getting the following bonuses (at the minimum, after meeting the spend requirement).

That lump - sum reward may seem like a sweet deal at the start, but it can quickly turn into an expensive mistake if you are stuck paying interest fees on a balance you ran up to meet the spending requirement.

You'll each earn the 50,000 point bonus plus at least 4,000 points for your $ 4,000 worth of spending (2x points on travel and dining at restaurants, so while the minimum is 4,000, it will be more than that if you have purchases in those categories), so after meeting all the requirements you'll have at minimum 54,000 points.