Sentences with phrase «men make more money»

Men make more money than women, women live longer than men, one of these is a benefit to anyone but I'm fairly certain that global forced sex - change operations would be resisted regardless of claims of benefit.

A significant example regards pay; taller men make more money per inch of height when other factors are controlled for, and of course have better chances of moving up the ranks.

Still, both men made more money than any athletes from Kiribati and the Marshall Islands.

In Vaudeville, straight men made more money than comics because it was rare to find someone who had a comedian's sense of timing but without a hunger for attention.

Not exact matches

Chaulk and Feldstein could not be more different from one another, yet both men demonstrate how the push to clean up and rebuild this city is at once a national project, a chance to make some money, and a test of the business and logistical acumen of those actually dealing with the mess.

There's a correlation that benefits both men and women when it comes to prioritizing the gym and making more money.

Men like their friends were looking for more fashionable looks and, Ratnani and Song believed, there was money to be made in helping them.

«If it's nothing more than «The Magnificent Ambersons,» Orson Welles» second film that made no money, I'll be a very happy man,» Hopper said in the movie.

But when you're out there working on a percentage, you're thinking, Man, I'm working hard, and the harder I work the more money that guy is making.

British researchers examined evidence from various online fundraising sites and found that men often donate more money to a campaign run by an attractive woman — if another man has already made a large donation to the same project.

As more men and money have flowed into the country thanks to prostitution, more and more women have arrived to serve them with the hopes of making a decent living.

Women are also making more money than they used to, albeit still often less than men.

Men tend to be focused on returns and while women want to make money as well, it's more important for them to know that they're being taken care of and that they're going to be financially secure.

For one thing, older generations have more money to spend on diamond jewelry and for another, the logic that convinces an American audience to buy man - made diamonds won't necessarily convince Indian or Chinese consumers.

At least they work, Do you know a stay - at home KEPT women that never paid a penny into Social Security gets to collect half the amount of what her husband collects and the husband did not pay a penny more than the single man that made the same amoount of money.

You'll support a man who is perfectly happy to shut down American factories and ship them to China: All to make a little more money for his already fabulously rich self.

Because of feminism, women make more money than man in the same jobs Because of feminism, it's hard to find a movie with a heroic male lead anymore.

Jesus believed in helping a man up, but did not believe in giving people more than they earned (parable of the talents) or in letting people make money in his name... he threw them out of the temple.

Problem definition is time - consuming, a deep journey into our own prejudices and hopes for a Christian faith that actually makes a difference, a horrible awakening that giants of the faith may have little faith in God and more in courts and money, that fame - seekers exist within the church system and garner friends as shields, that a man that marries a second wife may wish to destroy the first wife at any cost, and that authors can indeed write good books but run away from women speaking of their own abuse, and that prior friendships dictate the limits of Christianity....

Neither prospect, he says, can undo the fact of an information society in which work is more mental than physical and women often make more money than men, and neither can undo the reality of contraception and abortion which has broken the links between sex, babies, and the necessary male.

Then the text moved on to a formidable list of reformanda: inadequate procedures for selection and training of priests, pastoral responsibilities allotted to those living elsewhere (Campeggio as Bishop of Salisbury would be an example — but Rome was full of such men who used a part of their salary to pay a vicar to look after their diocese while they did other more congenial work in Rome); the bequeathing of benefices in wills especially to the children of priests, pluralism, failure to correct those who make money by hearing confessions.

So he moved to Man U, made more money in the process and won the PL.

He also has a great coaching staff with him that are as cholo as him but the problem here is our current board is more interested in making money than winning trophies so whoever they replace wenger with will have to be a «yes man»

So even though Man City, Liverpool and Man United are all doing just as badly as Arsenal and a lot worse if you consider how much more money they have spent, it seems to be Wenger who is always in the press, on the verge of being sacked and with players and staff supposedly disagreeing with every decision the Prof makes.

u know the problem with some fans make top four seem more important than a trophy.the reason arsenal wants top four is because of the money thats a fact everyone knows that.but as we move to city, man u they want ucl so that they can attract the big names thays why man u is fighting, same mancity notop four they know attracting world class players will be tough.do u think thats the same reason arsenal wants to finish top four??

Klopp's situation makes me respect Wenger even more BVB have only really sold 2 superstars well maybe 3 but they got Kagawa back (not that he was a superstar at Man U) but they've got a really strong squad and they've spend a lot of money on replacements for the likes of lewandowski.

Not just can they earn more money elsewhere but there are destinations would would make winning titles and competing in Europe a more likely prospect to two men in the prime of their careers.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

We make more money than Chelsea and Spurs and only Man U earn more money than the Arsenal.

Out of this he should spend that Lacazette money on Lukaku or Morata or Aubameyang.Morata is a player who I feel should he be given a team where he's the main man he's going to score a lot of goals.There's more to come from him.I think he'll do well here.It's a shame he usually warms the bench at Madrid.It makes him seem overrated but he's not.Lukaku has the height, physique, quality, speed, power, technique and finishing that Arsenal need in a striker.He looks like that kind of player who'll bang in a lot of goalsif given the chance in a top team.Aubameyang is very very fast and clinical and at his age he's at his best.If we sign him it's more likely he'll be here for a while than most of the two due to his age.

I also think that an early move could help us persuade the Saints to sell, as it gives them more time to use the money to sign a replacement or two, rather than leaving it to the last minute and making them determined not to lose one of their main men.

However, our hesitation means that we now have to deal with the likes of Barca, Man U and Liverpool all of which are more comfortable than we are with spending money and making decisions.

man united had done everything they can to achieve their goals and to make their customers happy while arsene cares more about saving the money for kroenke and himself and akbs have forgot football as well to become economists as him.

If he doesn't accept the generous contract offer that we offer him, which will make him a very rich man, and just signs for someone else for more money then he obviously doesn't want to play for us and will be thought of as just another mercenary player like RVP, Nasri, Hleb etc. I'm sure that what we offer him will be very good and the stalling to sign is just his agent angling for the highest offer so that his cut will be more.

It is Artie who is most eager for a visitor to meet Uncle Jim Rooney, who after World War I served as one of the youngest men ever elected to the Pennsylvania legislature, and who went on to give away all the money he ever made to people who said they needed it more than he did.

This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did at the end of the 90's and at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to put his filthy money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?

yeah thats what I mean, Man Utd refusing to pay 21 mil does not make sense after all the negotiation.Because they obviously have the money and they have paid more than that for other players.

Greedy Stan Kronke is only concerned with making money, and if Usmanov sells up then we are in it deep cos Wenger will continue to steal a living from the club as will that clown Walcott.We are also rans, there is no real desire to spend a penny more than necessary and every year Wenger fiddles around at the edges of the team but never really completes the job, I'm sick of watching the same game over and over, Wenger waving his arms about but doing the like for like subs on about 70 mins as usual while Bouldy sticks to his vow of silence, we are a joke among the top teams, and if Wenger signs a new deal then I may have to take a 2 year sabbatical cos I'm sick of the man and his bu # * ~ $ t press conferences,

i am arsenal 4 ever but i never want to see a performance like the 1 against man u ever again that was shocking too see» i was devestated» wenger ur a great manager but you need to get more talent in and fast even scott parker would be good for us strength in middle as well as skill look at chealsea n manchester united they both balance this well so get us back to the top arsen plz i know you can do it» and get rocky robin a good partner up front and a back up for theo wallcott who may i say has improved so has robin and jack also the players i have named bring them in plz we have t5he money make arsenal f.c great again plz!!!

3) Stan has made it perfectly clear that he is only keen on his own personal rewards from the club 4) Usmanov is richer than Stan and Abramovich and is prepared to spend the money the team needs to succeed 5) Man U are in far more debts than Arsenal but are still far richer, why?

* Curiosities about same sex stimulation, I think many men have these curiosities and it messes with them mentally, either they act on it or divulge in gay porn I DO NT THINK THATS TRUE UNLESS THEY ARE IN PRISON * Addiction to porn and / or jacking off ONLY WHEN GETTING IT FROM THEIR WIFE IS SUCH A CHORE * Medical Conditions such as low sex drive, he is older and it has been going down over the years, he has high blood pressure and takes medication, he also has low Vitamin D and takes supplements, he may have some ED issues as well LACK OF SEX COULD CAUSE AS WELL AS BE CAUSED BY THOSE FACTORS * Sexual advances from other woman and him acting on those or seeking out other women for comfort when he is angry and / or depressed A DEFINITE POSSIBILITY * His ADHD doesn't allow him to process issues normally, he is quick to anger, depression, and feeling disrespected that causes his to retreat * He was self raised, came from drug infested household where neglect, torture, and narcissism ruled, and he lost his mother at the age of 7 from drugs, growing up in foster care * I make more money and I control all the money, he is not interested in paying bills at all, this immaculateness him * He is a control freak and sex is his way of controlling me, where he otherwise can't control me as I am more educated and he is more vocational SOUNDS TO ME LIKE YOU ARE A MATCHED PAIR IN THAT RESPECT.

Maybe a woman like Schumer, who is worth at least $ 1 million and on her way to earn much more, would find a man who makes things other than money a marriageable man.

Maybe more men would be happy and willing to switch roles, but we know from research that many men are not, although some 45 percent of them say they'd stay at home if their wife made more money than they do, according to a recent survey by Men's Health and Spike men would be happy and willing to switch roles, but we know from research that many men are not, although some 45 percent of them say they'd stay at home if their wife made more money than they do, according to a recent survey by Men's Health and Spike men are not, although some 45 percent of them say they'd stay at home if their wife made more money than they do, according to a recent survey by Men's Health and Spike Men's Health and Spike TV.

* Curiosities about same sex stimulation, I think many men have these curiosities and it messes with them mentally, either they act on it or divulge in gay porn * Addiction to porn and / or jacking off * Medical Conditions such as low sex drive, he is older and it has been going down over the years, he has high blood pressure and takes medication, he also has low Vitamin D and takes supplements, he may have some ED issues as well * Sexual advances from other woman and him acting on those or seeking out other women for comfort when he is angry and / or depressed * His ADHD doesn't allow him to process issues normally, he is quick to anger, depression, and feeling disrespected that causes his to retreat * He was self raised, came from drug infested household where neglect, torture, and narcissism ruled, and he lost his mother at the age of 7 from drugs, growing up in foster care * I make more money and I control all the money, he is not interested in paying bills at all, this immaculateness him * He is a control freak and sex is his way of controlling me, where he otherwise can't control me as I am more educated and he is more vocational

Okay so American women want the man to make more money than them and take care of them yet they want to offload 50 % of traditional women's duties on to the same men.

We men are nothing more than a means to an end apparently, and when we are no longer useful, and every last ounce of strength and ability to make money is used up, out you go.

Husbands whose wives make more money are 61 % less likely to say they're happy Wives who are primary breadwinners are also significantly less happy about their family lives than other women Men are 5 times more likely to cheat when they're financially dependent on their wives Divorce is 40 % more likely when a women makes over 60 % of the family's income Much of the discussion around this topic so far has focused on the broader business and economic consequences of this shift.

Read that again — the men to marry are better educated and make more money than the ladies.

More seriously, the Brand / Ross statement came just 24 hours after the Prime Minister's latest defence of Peter Mandelson's friendship with the Russian oligarch, Oleg Deripaska, a man banned from entry to the United States, who made his money from Russia's aptly named «aluminium wars».

A NewSpace company is going to be making money supporting a manned spaceflight operation (in the form of the International Space Station) and it's going to be doing it much cheaper than NASA could alone, and with a great deal more innovation.