Stacia Friedman - Hill, Ph.D., a program director at NIH's National Institute of Mental Health, says these findings are particularly relevant to the field of
mental health research because many mental health disorders are marked by changes in cognitive function, sometimes years before clinical symptoms become significant, and because mental health disorders often involve changes in the developing brain.
Not exact matches
«This is an important issue to study
because mental health problems and social isolation are at epidemic levels among young adults,» lead author Brian Primack, M.D., Ph.D., director of Pitt's Center for
Research on media, technology and
health said in a statement.
The goals of
research on
mental health and the churches are, necessarily, at this point vague and indistinct, mainly
because of problems of definition and instrumentation.
Indeed, it is
because of our reputation for
research that experts often get asked to contribute to policy discussions — on everything from
mental health to European minority languages.
«This
research is important
because previous studies have shown that a reduction in blood supply to the heart (ischemia) during
mental stress doubles the risk of heart attack or death from heart disease,» said Viola Vaccarino, M.D., Ph.D., senior author of the study and professor of epidemiology and medicine at Emory University's Rollins School of Public
Health in Atlanta, Georgia.
Newly published
research from Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect (Routledge) has determined that verbal mistreatment is a highly prevalent concern among older adults in primary care clinics
because of its relation to negative
mental health outcomes including poor social functioning and major depression.
Research has shown that this is
because ACEs may increase a child's risk for toxic levels of stress, which in turn may impair brain development, behavior, and overall physical and
mental health.
The
research has broad applications in public
health because many
mental illnesses are rooted in disordered decision - making processes.
In an editor's note that accompanied the study, Dr. Seth A. Berkowitz called the
research «an important contribution
because it is, to my knowledge, the first large - scale study of coffee consumption to evaluate a
mental health outcome in women.»
This is one thing that's been completely on my mind in
researching and collaborating on this book, how back to the drawing board we are about so many things
because almost none of any of it contemplates the microbes in and on us and the impact on
health, metabolic, hormonal,
mental function, etc..
Injured workers with compensation claims that extend beyond the expected healing time are of concern
because their claims costs are higher than expected for their condition, and
research has shown that social and
mental health difficulties can increase in proportion to time away from work.
Many of the scales demonstrated weak psychometrics in at least one of the following ways: (a) lack of psychometric data [i.e., reliability and / or validity; e.g., HFQ, MASC, PBS, Social Adjustment Scale - Self - Report (SAS - SR) and all perceived self - esteem and self - concept scales], (b) items that fall on more than one subscale (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version), (c) low alpha coefficients (e.g., below.60) for some subscales, which calls into question the utility of using these subscales in
research and clinical work (e.g., HFQ, MMPI - A, CBCL - 1991 version, BASC, PSPCSAYC), (d) high correlations between subscales (e.g., PANAS - C), (e) lack of clarity regarding clinically - relevant cut - off scores, yielding high false positive and false negative rates (e.g., CES - D, CDI) and an inability to distinguish between minor (i.e., subclinical) and major (i.e., clinical) «cases» of a disorder (e.g., depression; CDI, BDI), (f) lack of correspondence between items and DSM criteria (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version, CDI, BDI, CES - D, (g) a factor structure that lacks clarity across studies (e.g., PSPCSAYC, CASI; although the factor structure is often difficult to assess in studies of pediatric populations, given the small sample sizes), (h) low inter-rater reliability for interview and observational methods (e.g., CGAS), (i) low correlations between respondents such as child, parent, teacher [e.g., BASC, PSPCSAYC, CSI, FSSC - R, SCARED, Connors Ratings Scales - Revised (CRS - R)-RSB-, (j) the inclusion of somatic or physical symptom items on
mental health subscales (e.g., CBCL), which is a problem when conducting studies of children with pediatric physical conditions
because physical symptoms may be a feature of the condition rather than an indicator of a
mental health problem, (k) high correlations with measures of social desirability, which is particularly problematic for the self - related rating scales and for child - report scales more generally, and (l) content validity problems (e.g., the RCMAS is a measure of anxiety, but contains items that tap mood, attention, peer interactions, and impulsivity).
This means that, regardless of the actual level of support your relationship receives from your friends and family, it is your own perception of that support that most strongly influences your relationship and
health outcomes.1 And yes, I did just say relationship AND
health outcomes,
because research has shown that not only do people in socially - supported relationships (same - sex AND mixed - sex) report greater relationship satisfaction, love, commitment and duration, they also experience fewer
mental and physical
health problems.
Source: UNC FPG Child Development Institute
Because we know from existing
research that experiences in child care can have long - term affects for children socially, fpg researchers wondered if such experiences could temper the
mental health impact of lower quality home environments.
The Disruptive Behavior Treatment (Child & Adolescent) topic area is relevant to child welfare
because documented
research shows that children who enter the child welfare system, particularly those that are removed from their home, experience a significantly higher rate of
mental health problems, including disruptive behavior than children in the general population.
However, many remain critical of Canada's record at integrating
research and practice in the prevention of child and youth
mental health problems (Davidson 2011; Kutcher 2011; Kutcher and Davidson 2007; McLennan et al. 2004)
because in widely disseminated programs, rigorous evaluation, or even minimal evidence of effectiveness, is frequently absent (Cooper et al. 2000; Smith et al. 2003).
Unfortunately, most
mental health professionals are not aware of the conceptual shift
because of their ignorance regarding the scientific advances made in the neuro - developmental
research regarding child development.