This is a straightforward consequence of the variability in the parameter estimation (not to
mention measurement errors in the various observations).
Not exact matches
Naturally this article fails to
mention that since the hydrosphere is 271 times as massive as the atmosphere, if oceans are absorbing the heat they are likely to moderate AGW into a nonproblem, as the average ocean temperature has only changed by.1 degrees in 50 years, an amount that is probably smaller than
measurement error.
And by increasing the dynamic stiffness we can nearly eliminate the effect of electrostatic forces between the sample and cantilever body, which are major sources of
error in today's PFM
measurements, as
mentioned.»
One «
Error» or correction I'd like to
mention is the
measurements.
Perhaps a more reasonable explanation, though, is that there is some bias in the tests upon which the TVAAS scores are measured (as likely related to some likely issues with the vertical scaling of Tennessee's tests, not to
mention other
measurement errors).
It's interesting to notice the same denier crowd «accidentally» neglects to
mention the up to ~ 7 %
measurement error in ice extent values at certain times of the year when trumpeting «record ice extent in Antarctica».
One «
Error» or correction I'd like to
mention is the
measurements.