Sentences with phrase «mentioned by other authors»

Not exact matches

Of course, what there is maybe two «other» mentions of Jesus by some questionable authors.

And what are these dangers the author keeps mentioning but not enumerating and how do they compared to the dangers posed by organized religion and other organized philosophies like fascism and communism, «manifest destiny» and other philosophies that those oh so nobly «organized» people have «blessed» us with over the centuries?

The authors, led by Dr. Miklos Z. Molnar at UT, mention several theories as to how RLS is possibly linked to other poor health outcomes.

Apparently the existence of at least one other solar physicist was not considered worthy of mention by the author of the blog.

We had 490 downloads, which is 490 new readers who may go on to buy other books by the same author, or who might leave reviews on the ebook, or who might mention the book to a friend, helping promote it by word of mouth.

But I do want to thank Mr. Kozlowski for the additional publicity he has given me, as well as the other authors mentioned by name.

Perhaps the Twitter exchange story in your piece would have been clarified if you'd mentioned the other author by name.

Like others have mentioned, I'd also like to see more reviews of digital first books and perhaps more reviews on books written by lesser known authors.

One key point I noted in reading Data Guy's original report is that the KU results are skewed, as you mentioned, by the non-KU Authors other sales sites earnings not being reported.

The other features — already mentioned — were the identification of dominant regional concerns, the highlighting of climate change impacts already occurring, and the report's effectiveness as an engagement tool, which Mooney had just commented on, plus one more thing: the focus on extreme events, which are both most noticeable by the public and the primary source of economic damage in the next several decades, as Dr. Michael Hanemann (author of this paper) explained to me for a story I wrote about the California drought.

To put things in perspective, I should first mention the talk by Tom Lowell, on work in collaboration with about a dozen other authors, concerning organic remains from the Istorvet Ice Cap in East Greenland.

Deciding which of these papers to mention can be quite a subjective process, and other experts on a subtopic might strongly disagree with the selection made by the IPCC authors.

Another connection item is how this lawsuit mentions book author / documentary movie star Naomi Oreskes, and does so in mildly ironic fashion by noting her «survey of Exxon documents» (others dispute it heavily).

42 On the other hand, the fact that the setting up of the database required, irrespective of the creation of the data which it contains, significant labour and skill of its author, as mentioned in section (c) of that same question, can not as such justify the protection of it by copyright under Directive 96/9, if that labour and that skill do not express any originality in the selection or arrangement of that data.

The bulk of the critique veered off into a number of tangents and ad hominems having little to do with the documentary itself, such as discussing an article written several years earlier by Prof. Meier, attacking Lundy Bancroft, another expert on domestic violence who was shown in the film, and speculating about the author of briefly mentioned other research.]