It's interesting that Alan
mentioned historical points where stocks «fall out of a bed in one fell swoop, as they did in 1987 and, more recently, the turn of the century.»
Not exact matches
Perhaps it
points to one of the unfinished aspects of Whitehead's systematic position, but I
mention it to indicate the sense in which Whitehead was aware that the discussion of human and
historical problems required the introduction of new concepts only loosely related to the categoreal scheme.
Of all the possible names here we will
mention only that of our own teacher, the moderately conservative Joachim Jeremias, who deserves to be heard on this
point, if only because he has done more than any other single scholar to add to our knowledge of the
historical Jesus.
None of this is to say that the market will move lower, or ultimately plumb the lowest
points of its
historical range for any of the ratios
mentioned.
Curator Francesca Herndon - Consagra
mentions this explicitly in the conceptual statement about the exhibition, referring to Tadao Ando's architecture and Rock Settee by Scott Burton as principle
points of curatorial investigation, and conflating them with the visual language and art
historical touchstone of dreams.
They neglect the pre-1980s temperatures, the post-2000 temperatures, and the recent millennium of
historical temperatures — they take a few unidentified data
points out of a long series that support their desired
point — fail to
mention those data
points and past trends that refute their
point — and assert that they have presented a valid overall picture — in short, cherry - picking.
The proprietors are a bit puzzled, because they saw Ana Ravelo give a very similar presentation: — RRB - It was what I was referring to when I
mentioned «a rather silly presentation on «changing climate sensitivity» which IMO just
pointed to the inappropriateness of trying to analyse all
historical climate changes as if they were a response to an imposed CO2 forcing, which of course they were not.»