Deputy Attorney General, Joseph Kpemka who made this revelation on Point Blank segment of Eyewitness News however fell short of
mentioning names of persons involved.
When asked to
mention the name of the person who was used as his replacement, the sobbing former Vice President would not specifically
mention the name of the person.
Always
mention the name of the person or organization who is submitting the eLearning press release.
Doug Hoyes: So, should
we mention the name of this person and institution and call them out right here, right now?
If so, please
mention the name of the person whose name should appear on the gift certificate
So I made a note to go back to my other posts on Slaw to see if they sounded the same, and ended up counting all instances where
I mentioned the name of a person or character to proceed to a «reference audit».
Once again, it is helpful to
mention the name of the person in the article as well as the name of the organization.
In this cover letter, you need to
mention the name of the person who has referred you for the job.
In the letter below, notice that the opening sentence
mentions the name of the person who referred you to the reader.
Be sure to
mention the name of the person they referred.
Not exact matches
Several
of the tweets simply listed the
names of people killed by guns, with well over 100
mentioned as
of noon Thursday.
Even if YOU have avoided any
of the situations
mentioned above, keep in mind that there is probably more than one
person with your
name in the world.
We
mention this because we have long noticed that the best - known quotes attributed to all sorts
of long dead famous
people — the ones one immediately finds on the first page that pops up when googling their
names — are more often than not either garbled beyond recognition, or misattributed, or at times even completely made up.
People parrot that saying that «religion is the cause
of more pain and suffering than anything else» without ever
mentioning once any
of the good that has been done in the
name of religion.
First off, Tacitus never
mentioned Jesus» life or works: only that there were a group
of people named christians.
For those who believe in God, I can not fathom that any
of you think God would reject a dying
persons thoughts or regrets at their failings in life because HIS
name was not
mentioned.
In other words with all the things going on in the world this long winded ambiguous rant about the religious beliefs
of a horror writer whose
name I've barely heard
mentioned in the last decade is being presented as the most important information
people need to know at this particular time.
1 Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye
people, from far; The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels
of my mother hath he made
mention of my
name.
I'd hate to be one
of the
people with a
name mentioned in this article... they're going to look rather foolish come Sunday.
Plenty
of people telling their story without
mentioning specific
names beyond David's.
I am shocked that these «EXPERTS» who are looking into the authenticity
of this little fragment
of papyrus, do not even
mention that this
person named Jesus could be someone else who had the same
name!
UH hello!!!!! He
MENTIONS some
of the
names so
people CAN go check it out for themselves... just cause he doesn't
mention the other 500 does NOT mean no one will know... as I wrote..
Paul isnot going to sit and
name each and everyone
of them... the
people can go and verify for themselves... Paul
mentions they exist becaue he can believe that
people willnot be so gullible and go find out for themselves if they really wanted to
For that reason, I have removed the personal
names of the
people you
mentioned and just left their initials.
And by the way, Haman is the villain in this story and when Israelites told the story
of Esther, whenever the
name Haman is
mentioned, all the
people would boo and hiss.
Later in Mark the
people of Nazareth
name the four brothers
of Jesus and
mention his sisters (Mk 6:3; cf. Mt 13:55).
To the folks who are vehemently denying this
person was a Christian, I would urge you to consider this: If a
person with a muslim
name commits an act
of terrorism, he is immediately labelled an «Islamic» terrorist, no questions asked, even though the Quran clearly states that a
person who kills an innocent is like he / she has murdered then whole
of humanity (the Quran
mentions this in reference to murder
of ANY innocent
person, irrespective
of the victims belief): To quote from the Quran: «On that account We ordained for the Children
of Isra`il that if any one slew a
person — unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land — it would be as if he slew the whole humanity: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the whole humanity.
Neville i
mentioned those
people only because the discussion was talking about dominionism the combination
of the church and state as a governing rule all those
people were government leaders all
of them suffered in there own way.Its was the suffering that prepared them for the roles that they were to play and there faith in God was what helped them get through.We are made stronger in our weakness no matter how important or unimportant we may appear to others.I guess it is easy to fall into the lie about political involvement that its hard to make change but some
people have had a huge impact.Really it is God who deserves the praise he is the one that creats the opportunitys to make impact on the world as in our strength we can do nothing.In hebrews the great men and woman
of faith there are those that seemed unimportant to the world and many suffered for there faith Our Lord knows everyone by
name and every small act
of faith we do he remembers because we do it out
of our love for him that is what the christian walk is about living for Jesus and sharing that love with others.brentnz.
On the day
of Ghadir, as we
mentioned previously — and it is
mentioned by both Shi`a and Sunni — he indicated that Ali should be his successor and he
named him as the master
of the
people.
It would be invidious to
mention the
names of popular books which commend prayer and set forth techniques
of praying, but are so alien to the whole Christian position — although written sometimes by ministers
of Christian bodies — that it is astounding that they are accepted so readily by
people who profess and call themselves Christians.
He actually
mentions names, and appeals to the witness
of people still alive who had had that experience.
I'd say half
of the most impactful
people I know, who love Jesus and tear up at the
mention of His
name, who reach out to the poor and lonely and are fundamentally sound in their theology, who create institutions that feed hundreds
of thousands, do not attend a traditional church service.
Instead
of being around
people who «accept» Jesus but who seem bored with him, they want to be around
people who come alive at the
mention of his
name.
Dude survived the holocaust and he's worried about some guy 1000's
of miles away saying a prayer and lowering another
person into the water after
mentioning his family's
name....
They are actually forbidden to
mention the
name of Jesus until they have first helped that
person fix an appliance, or brought them a meal when they were sick, or helped them construct their house.
Speaking
of making
people happy, my mom was peering over my shoulder the whole time I was making these, and may have
mentioned one or two or three times that she doesn't like the new blog
name.
I even thought top clubs were in for him.Some three or 2 seasons back many here were debating why he should be our main striker.As soon as you
mention any other strikers
name people would come out with stats and many things defending him.Even Wenger has defended him blindly in the past.
People say Wenger's stubborn yeah.But don't we know that there's a reason why everything happens?Honestly speaking he's the reason why Arsene Wenger has failed to sign a top notch striker because he still believes in him.The funny thing is we signed Welbeck at that time who to me did nothing before to be the main man here.
People keep saying Welbeck is hardworking and that he works his socks off.But the question is was that our reason for signing him.Welbeck being signed to challenge Giroud tells me a lot about Giroud's quality.Even Walcott (no offence to him) who has zero CF qualities was even chosen over him for a string
of games and all in all I think he did well but has too many defeciencies for that role.We've compromised as a club and it'll come back to bite us.
Conte vs wenger all time in 8 tries conte has beaten wenger once why would we try to bring someone who cant beat our current manager and that is a testament to our current manager and the only
name worth considering out
of the few
mentioned is joachim loew who i think would do well and klopp vs him would be interesting but conte who cant beat are current manager is this article serious i hope not do
people not think depthfully anymore and mourinho would be terrible but i do nt mind loew ancellotti certainly i hope not pray not out all the
names mentioned people even those who do nt like wenger seem to think they will maybe just do as good most think worse but i like loews
name i think he would do well and would support his signing
I have heard
people clamouring for all sorts
of players who don't have any proven record as winners simply because their
names have been
mentioned several times.
So, if he WAS interested in this player, firstly, why was he NOT signed and secondly, and by far the most important
of all, where in Griezmanns OWN autobiography does he
mention Wenger's
name as the
person who lied to him?.
Brendan Rodgers is the third most
mentioned name and while I like Brendan and I his style
of football, I just don't feel like he'll fix the defense and command the respect some
of the other
people mentioned, and his demise at Liverpool after Suarez was sold reminds me
of what Wenger is doing now, and we've sold our best players before, but there's something about him that makes me want to give him a chance, especially after giving Wenger 10 more years than he deserves.
Reportedly, a number
of people were arrested although the only
name that I have seen
mentioned is Newcastle managing director Lee Charnley, who was later released without charge.
And not that we need to
mention this, but a lot
of people are going to be confused about the pronunciation
of your child's
name, too (is it Freeeeda or FrEYEda?).
Two gentlemen who were key suspects in the murder
of the late JB Danquah, a former MP have also been discharged just at the time they have rather begun talking and threatened to
mention names of high profile
persons who contracted them to kill the former MP.
But when even the largest group
of victims is not
mentioned, the message is «Ok, we're observing this day because we sort
of have to, but we would really rather not be reminded
of all that stuff, all those
people who shall not be
named.»
«I have spoken to some
of the minority members about why they keep
mentioning my
name and they say it is just for the politics... the problem with this country is the politics; we play politics with everything and so
people are careful before doing anything for the country.
In the case
of this poll therefore, what we don't know is how
people would have answered a question saying how would you vote at a general election if Gordon Brown were still leader — given his current popularity,
mentioning his
name in the question may have produced worse results.
I want to inform the Nigerian
people of my innocence and make them realise that I am in constant relation with the security personnel and they know where to find me but wonder why I had to be declared wanted on national news even
mentioning my husband's
name alongside.
He'll thank a million
people that he owes some kind
of political debt to — and the camera will magically be on those
people as he
mentions their
name — and tell us that NYS's finances are in HORRIBLE condition and that he'll corral state spending and miraculously make the state Senate and Assembly play nice together.
Mention the
name Wedgwood Benn and most
people think
of Tony Benn, politician and minister and enfant terrible
of the Labour Party in the last half
of the twentieth century.