Sentences with phrase «mentioning of admissibility»

Secondly, another problematic aspect of the omission of the mentioning of admissibility is that the ECJ also tacitly approves the above mentioned approach and reasoning of the General Court which directly turned to the substance of the case without examining the admissibility «for the sake of the economy of procedure».

Not exact matches

B is an attempt to decide upon the details of a type of theory whose admissibility as a type has not been shown, owing to the role of the fallacy mentioned (which is implicit both in traditional proofs for God's existence and in atheistic criticisms of these proofs).

While in its Order of 14 July 2005 in Case C ‑ 70 / 04 transferring the case to the General Court, the Court had expressly mentioned this possibility (albeit without giving its view on it), the present judgement entirely omits any reference to the admissibility of the Swiss appeal.

In R. v. Wong, 2010 BCCA 160, the B.C. Court of Appeal mentions that «[a] s a result of the decisions in Grant and Harrison, trial courts have been directed to take a view of all relevant circumstances in making a decision about admissibility of evidence under s. 24 (2) of the Charter.»

This will boost Grant (and Harrison) on any search for «admissibility of evidence» or for «Charter s. 24 (2)» because these terms are mentioned in a context that refers to Grant.