There is nothing wrong with
mentioning potential biases in your opponent as part of your argument.
Not exact matches
GFI aims for diversity in their hires primarily through hiring practices that are intended to help them minimize the effects of
bias, such as encouraging staff to score applications anonymously, using generalized ability tests, and meeting applicants only late in the process.88 While they've hired many women, including in seven of nine director roles, they find that their team is lacking in diversity in other ways, and they've met with Encompass to discuss further steps they can take to develop their diversity strategy.89 One staff member we spoke to
mentioned that they hoped GFI would be able to begin paying interns, which might help diversify their team by broadening the pool of
potential interns who could afford to take a position with GFI.90, 91
As you
mentioned gravity changes due to many causes, also orbital drift and large guesses with
potential biases make the estimates of total ice volume have very large error bars.
The scenario encapsulates so much BS from assumptions, ignorance of observational trends, rational action on big and apparent dangers, and then there is the data sets, the models, the
potential for
bias, did I
mention the assumptions.
Mention of «
potential» is not the same as showing a
bias.
As a viewer of the Canadian broadcasting system, moreover, I find rather patronizing — not to
mention alarming — the suggestion that the government's regulator must protect me from
potential editorial
biases.
Absent further evidence of
potential bias, a Facebook friendship between judges and counsel shouldn't even be worthy of
mention as grounds for recusal.