He also disagreed over the legislative intent of the s. 16 history, citing the House of Commons, Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence of the Legislative Committee on Bill C - 15, No. 2, 2nd Session, 33rd Parl., December 4, 1986, to highlight that nothing in the 1987 amendments suggests
a mere verbal ability would be sufficient,
The trial judge should be able to ascertain whether a witness has more than just
mere verbal ability, and determine if they can tell the difference between truth and fiction and the importance maintaining consistent testimony.