If this is
merely a question of the «definition» of
marriage in a semantic sense, I see
civil marriage as a different animal than holy matrimony.
courts, and until the time of James I, it was punished through the instrumentality of those tribunals not
merely because ecclesiastical rights had been violated, but because upon the separation of the ecclesiastical courts from the
civil the ecclesiastical were supposed to be the most appropriate for the trial of matrimonial causes and offences against the rights of
marriage, just as they were for testamentary causes and the settlement of the estates of deceased persons.