You can claim to be the «voice of reason», and explain why you feel justified in attacking those that are religious, but
it merely proves my point.
Not exact matches
I am not suggesting faith in God is the same as faith in astrophysics but
merely to
point out that you too use faith as claimed knowledge in something that you simply can not
prove.
Some commentators have observed that Gould may have
proven his own
point about bias being inevitable in science, but with the bias
merely being his own rather than Morton's.
But you clealy show no signs of understanding but
merely repeat platitudes
proving again my
points.
Picking a single poll, data set of perspective out of context and without relevance does not
prove a
point, but
merely raises it.