Sentences with phrase «merit pay»

"Merit pay" refers to a system or policy where an employee's salary or wage is determined based on their performance, skills, or achievements rather than through a fixed salary scale or tenure. It means that the amount of money a worker earns is directly linked to how well they do their job. Full definition
According to the 2017 Education Next poll, support for merit pay for teachers among the general public has dropped from 67 percent in 2010 to 46 percent in 2017.
He's also in favor of merit pay for effective teachers.
It doesn't do the kids and the schools any good for him to propose the kind of teacher merit pay system that has failed in school districts around the country.
Where do you stand on merit pay for teachers?
Among those who either completely or somewhat supported merit pay in 2008, 34 percent did not give that support one year later.
Twenty - nine states had initiated some sort of merit pay program for teachers by 1986.
Top - down reform strategies, such as merit pay or high - stakes testing, may be fragile, too vulnerable to shifts in the political winds.
In general, merit pay plans are more likely to be symbolic than substantive and more likely to be promised than delivered.
The union leader says his major problem with merit pay systems is that it's «too subjective» and puts the emphasis on individual teachers.
The public tends to favor merit pay, and recent developments have not altered that fact in one direction or another.
And it offers financial rewards to urban school districts that improve performance through initiatives like merit pay for teachers.
For instance, many teachers unions across the country have opposed merit pay in contract negotiations, despite the fact that individual teachers may support it.
Schools that already compete for students appear more open to including merit pay in their personnel policies.
To be clear, this is not about merit pay.
Still, there are several telling examples of established interests blocking merit pay proposals.
We believe policymakers should consider using merit pay as a tool to recruit and hold on to effective teachers.
The question of how these two new pay elements differ from merit pay inevitably arises.
A lingering concern, however, is that the analysis may be contaminated by the fact that the very cultures that introduce merit pay are those that set high expectations for student achievement.
This matches the trend in the private sector, where workers are organized into teams and group awards are rapidly replacing individual merit pay programs.
The $ 4.5 billion «Race to the Top» competitive school funding grant program encourages states to offer merit pay as an incentive.
Why not instead provide merit pay for the class?
If merit pay systems help attract and motivate effective teachers, schools in a more competitive environment will have incentives to adopt those systems.
The results of standardized tests also should not, by themselves, determine whether a teacher gets merit pay, is fired or promoted, etc..
The new merit pay language mirrors the evaluation policy: both seem to align the union with education reform efforts more than ever before, but come with major caveats.
Think about two schools, one with many more teachers than the other, both participating in a school - wide merit pay program.
He found that students in countries with merit pay policies in place were performing approximately 0.25 standard deviations higher on an international math and science test than students in countries without such policies.
Did schools with fewer teachers show signs that teachers were responding to merit pay incentives?
And teachers can earn merit pay if their students score highly.
They also push to increase education funding and discourage merit pay.
And the idea that merit pay leads to better teaching is not backed up by research.
The central idea here is that teachers could face relatively strong or weak incentives under the same merit pay program as a result of the number of teachers at their school.
None of the forces that cause organizations to seek effective merit pay systems, or to maintain and alter them effectively over time, exist in public education.
The effectiveness of these short - lived merit pay programs is exceptionally difficult to measure because of these selection effects.
They are more likely to design and maintain merit pay systems in a sensible way, since their revenue depends on it.
In response to such concerns, there was a flurry of merit pay activity in the early 1980s.
I could spend more time than I have here to talk about the uphill politics behind creating and sustaining merit pay.
Whether these conditions can be met in the teaching profession, where there is no single blueprint for effective practice, has been the most contentious issue surrounding merit pay.
Yet by any measure support for merit pay outweighs the opposition.
The state did not close poorly performing schools, eliminate tenure for teachers or add merit pay.
The study shows that merit pay translates to four additional weeks of learning per school year.
I don't think we should have merit pay until fair and equitable criteria are established.
Lack of merit pay drives good teachers out of teaching.
It is during this time, when retiring or defeated legislators can have a profound effect on policy, that a false merit pay proposal may be considered.
Several simple experiments were embedded in poll questions on merit pay, charter schools, and school vouchers.
We disagree on much, including big issues like merit pay for teachers and the best strategies for school choice.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z