In a 2010 pretrial ruling, the Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed the State's constitutional obligation and remanded the case back to the trial court for full trial on
the merits of Plaintiffs» adequacy and equity claims.
Because the purpose of this competition is to give law students the opportunity to develop their trial skills, the actual
merits of the plaintiff's case and the defendant's case presented are irrelevant to this purpose.
The competition is not to be decided on
the merits of the plaintiff's or defendant's case.
According to court records, the issue in this case was not
the merits of the plaintiff's case but instead whether she filed within the statutory 180 - day filing period according to 14 M.R.S. § 8107, which details the notice that is required when a plaintiff plans to file a lawsuit against a governmental entity.
If the plaintiff fails to satisfy the court as to the substantive
merit of the plaintiff's case, the action should be dismissed with costs on a full indemnity basis.
The brief detailed the defendant's assessment of
the merits of the plaintiff's claim and the reasons why it didn't think the claim would be successful.
Social media evidence is often admissible in court and is a potent weapon used by defense lawyers when disputing
the merits of a plaintiff's personal injury claim.
«Hour long depositions of unserved potential defendants regarding whether they used the infringing devices, questions speaking directly to
the merits of Plaintiff's claim, not only lack specificity but weigh against the potential defendants» expectation of privacy.
We are confident that when the court ultimately addresses
the merits of the plaintiffs» claim, it will be rejected by the court.»
Not exact matches
In his 68 - page finding, Chen was careful to note that saying the
plaintiffs constitute a class — one that potentially now includes a majority
of Uber's 160,000 U.S. - based drivers — doesn't say anything about whether those
plaintiffs have justice on their side when it comes to the
merit of their suit.
But yesterday saw one
of the first rulings to address the
merits of lawsuits by nonprofit
plaintiffs (39 cases and counting), notes Religion Clause, which has...
Judges in Greene and Albany counties threw out petitions by the
plaintiffs — the Brennan Center for Justice and several Democratic lawmakers — without addressing the
merits of their legal arguments to have the practice overturned.
Tsoho, who expressed his doubts about the locus standi
of the
plaintiff, said, «Nevertheless, the court will consider the
merits of the issues raised for determination by the
plaintiff.»
Before getting to the
merits of these claims, it is worth pointing out that the
plaintiffs lack standing to sue in the first place.
Several courts, when deciding new adequacy cases, have either dismissed them based on separation
of powers grounds or have ruled against the
plaintiffs on the
merits following a trial.
The appellate court agreed with the trial court's May 2016 opinion finding that Florida's system
of free public schools satisfies constitutional requirements, and opined that
plaintiffs» claims «either raise political questions not subject to judicial review or were correctly rejected on the
merits.»
In their appeal to the Supreme Court, state officials did not stress the
merits of the law but argued instead that the
plaintiffs who challenged it lacked the legal standing to do so.
These two agencies filed an appeal, arguing that the
plaintiff parents had not met the requisite elements for injunctive relief, including (a) likelihood
of success on the
merits, (b) unavailability
of an adequate remedy at law, and (c) being in the public interest.
In order to receive a preliminary injunction, the
plaintiffs must show they are likely to prevail on the
merits of the case.
The new trial court stated: «The only scenario likely to cause further delay
of concern to
Plaintiff is the possibility that the Court
of Appeals will not rule on the jurisdictional issue or on the
merits, but will dismiss the appeal as moot, concluding that the trial court should not have denied the motions to dismiss the first complaint after the
Plaintiff had filed his amended complaint.»
So the
plaintiffs in this case need to either (a) show actual damages, or (b) convince the court under the applicable standard
of proof that they will suffer damages and they are likely to prevail on the
merits of the case, and possibly secure a bond for the losses to the defendants in the meantime.
Plaintiffs with commercial litigation cases who are in need
of funding can turn to LexShares, which then reviews the case for
merit and, if it passes muster, puts out an offering for investors to buy.
After all these years, the Ecuadorian
plaintiffs deserve to have the recognition and enforcement
of the Ecuadorian judgment heard on the
merits in an appropriate jurisdiction.
A summary
of the
plaintiff's claims can be found in the judge's decision on the
merits.
The
plaintiff's lawyer must file a written certificate
of merit along with the lawsuit.
For her part, the
Plaintiff submitted that she had brought her claim in good faith but had not been successful in persuading the court
of the
merits of her claim.
The case was hardly frivolous, with the appellate court frowning on the trial judge's finding
of lack
of merit based on
plaintiff simply approving a form
of judgment so saying — this was hardly an admission.
For example, an Affidavit
of Merit from a properly qualified medical professional, or professionals, must be filed by the
plaintiff shortly after a lawsuit is initiated.
The Certificate
of Merit is an opinion from a medical expert / certified physician offering evidence that the physician has reviewed the
plaintiff's medical records, and based on the review, believes that there is a strong argument for an act
of malpractice committed by the defendant based on the fact that evidence suggests the defendant deviated from the appropriate standard
of care.
Once a limitation period has expired, a
plaintiff is prevented from suing, regardless
of the
merits of the claim.
[8] I acknowledge there is some
merit to the
plaintiff's submission that, notwithstanding the absence
of success on the issue
of thoracic outlet syndrome, the
plaintiff's offer took into account the risk
of failure on that issue.
In this case, it is in the interests
of the representative
plaintiff and members
of the class that the action proceeds without any further appeals so that the
merits of the action can be determined within a reasonable time.
In his research paper, MDL Proceedings: Eliminating the Chaff, John Beisner, a Partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, looks at the aggressive advertising
plaintiffs» counsel uses to attract clients for MDL, regardless
of claim
merit, and the subsequent pressure placed on defendants.
The district court correctly noted that its function at the class certification stage was not to determine whether
plaintiffs had stated a cause
of action or whether they would prevail on the
merits, but rather whether they had shown, based on methodology that was not fatally flawed, that the requirements
of Rule 23 were met.
If, instead
of bringing counterclaims in the original lawsuit, the defendant brings a separate lawsuit against the
plaintiff, the
plaintiff could seek to either (1) consolidate the cases if they are filed in the same court system (i.e. a federal case and a federal case, or a New York State case and a New York State case), or (2) move to dismiss the new lawsuit because the claims were required to be brought in the original lawsuit as mandatory counterclaims, or (3) move to stay proceedings in the second lawsuit pending resolution
of the first lawsuit, or (4) move to dismiss the claims in the second lawsuit on the
merits if it is apparent from the face
of the countersuit that it does not state a claim upon which relief can be granted or was filed in the wrong court.
Although insurers aim to only underwrite claims with a good chance
of success,
plaintiffs with Trial Insurance may overvalue the
merits of their case and push to have their day in court — regardless
of whether that day is necessary.
The
Plaintiff objected to this practice and further to the
merits of the attempt to dispose
of the claim summarily.
The
plaintiff's attorney will then file the certificate
of merit with the court to confirm that the attorney has consulted with a medical expert and that the
plaintiff's claims have
merit.
A: One obstacle
plaintiffs in many states may have to overcome before they can even file a medical malpractice action against a health care professional is the requirement that they file what is commonly known as a «certificate
of merit.»
The Court saw
merits in both
Plaintiff counsel's and ICBC»S lawyer's arguments, and would eventually award the
Plaintiff $ 80,000.00 gross for loss
of past earning capacity.
In order to file a certificate
of merit, a
plaintiff will first have to have an expert, usually another physician, review the relevant medical records and certify that the
plaintiff's health care provider deviated from accepted medical practices, and, as a result, the
plaintiff was injured.
The court refused to entertain these pleadings in the judgment, suggesting that a role
of the courts may still exist in mediating even political speech where defamation may have occurred, and
plaintiffs should not be deterred from pursuing these claims where some
merit may exist.
Actually, this is just part
of the oddity; though it was not pivotal to the court's conclusions, at one point the
plaintiff responded that he had no views on the
merits of his own action.
The
Plaintiff Will Get Her Day in Court Because
of this ruling by the Indiana Supreme Court, the
Plaintiff's case will be sent back down to the District Court and tried on the
merits.
However if damages can not adequately compensate the
plaintiff, or can not be recovered then the CTA must ask whether, if the defendant were successful at final disposition
of the
merits, damages would be an adequate remedy for any loss that it would incur due to the interim order
Importance: Before the Court
of Appeal, Facebook submitted the judge erred in (1) interpreting section 4
of the Privacy Act to override the forum selection clause; (2) holding the
plaintiff had shown strong cause to not enforce the forum selection clause; and (3) failing to decide whether California or B.C. law applied to the
merits.
In order to obtain a temporary injunction, the
plaintiff is required to establish (1) the likelihood
of irreparable harm, (2) the unavailability
of an adequate remedy at law, (3) substantial likelihood
of success on the
merits, and (4) that the injunction will serve the public interest.
The judge rejected
plaintiff's request for a special jury instruction notifying jurors that the
merits of the case — not her motive — were the issue they were responsible for deciding.
The appeals panel agreed that a certificate
of merit under 622 had to be complied with by the
plaintiff.
[19] Concerning the third factor, whether the document would prevent the determination
of the issue on the
merits, I have heard evidence including the
plaintiff's evidence and the defendants» evidence and expert evidence about the
plaintiff's activity and her level
of disability.