He was quoted by ACN as saying: «Turning Parliament red is a wonderful way to get
the message about religious freedom to as wide an audience as possible.»
Not exact matches
It is therefore quite significant that a recent article by Bultmann seems to be by implication a defence of Ksemarm's position against an initial criticism by the Barthian Hermann Diem: Diem had maintained that when all is said and done Käsemann has presented Jesus as only proclaiming «general
religious and moral truths»
about «the
freedom of the children of God», rather than a
message in continuity with the Church's kerygma.
They are knowingly attempting to inject their
religious world view on everyone and anyone because they believe they know how best to live and don't give a rat's ass
about anyone elses
freedoms or rights, but if you want to call that «doing their best» then you can take your
message back to it's authors, the vile disgusting things, the wh.o.re of Babylon, the putrid decaying evil of Joseph Smith and shove it down his dead and crumbling corpse.
Andrew Selous (Con, seemingly stretched) makes another critical point
about freedom of
religious belief with reference to someone who came a cropper because of a Faceboook
message.