They send a clear
message about the harm of plastic pollution and where it can lead us if we don't take action.
Not exact matches
As I mentioned in the beginning of this newsletter, a recent heart to heart with a student really made me sit back and think
about ensuring that my
message of «doing more» wasn't at the expense of doing
harm to a student.
No
messages about drinking less or alcohol associated
harms were identified.
Simply improving
messaging in accordance with recommendations of psychologists or following the recommendations of economists to create economic incentives to engage in less GHG producing behavior will not likely create strong citizen support for climate change policies unless citizens better understand that the narrative created by opponents of climate change policies
about high levels of scientific uncertainty and unacceptable
harm to the economy from the adoption of climate policies is not only false but has been manufactured by fossil fuel companies and other entities which have economic interests in continuing high levels of fossil fuel consumption.
It was because we we're trying to spread the
message about the dioxins from proposed waste - to - energy plants,
about the
harms and all of the potential for
harm of the toxics from these incinerators.
The letter expressed concern that the blog post in question sent «a
message that legal research and writing («LRW») courses are not rigorous, underestimates the ability of LRW faculty to comment on students» cognitive skills,
harms students by discounting the valuable and thoughtful insight we have to offer
about students seeking to transfer to Yale, and devalues LRW professors as a whole.»
It's
about sending a
message throughout North Carolina that the actions that
harmed your loved one will not
harm another person.
If you abide by the discovery and disclosure requirement, then no
harm, no foul and no need to worry,
about the
message, is there?