That framing costs as a foregone - gain increased the amount people were prepared to reduce emissions is noteworthy because public
messages about climate policy impacts typically frame the costs of reducing emissions as a loss [13]-- a pattern confirmed by our analysis of newspaper communications regarding the future costs of Australia's carbon pricing scheme.
Not exact matches
A broad array of leading
climate scientists and policy specialists were also criticizing the panel for the exact opposite reason: They believe the main conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) may be too general and too conservative to convey a clear message about the grave threat of warming and to inform policies to address local climate change
climate scientists and
policy specialists were also criticizing the panel for the exact opposite reason: They believe the main conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) may be too general and too conservative to convey a clear message about the grave threat of warming and to inform policies to address local climate change
Climate Change (IPCC) may be too general and too conservative to convey a clear
message about the grave threat of warming and to inform
policies to address local
climate change
climate change issues.
Climate is
about more than energy
policy and can not legitimately be folded into it, despite the
messaging strategy that many in the environmental and sustainable energy communities have been going along with.
Simply improving
messaging in accordance with recommendations of psychologists or following the recommendations of economists to create economic incentives to engage in less GHG producing behavior will not likely create strong citizen support for
climate change
policies unless citizens better understand that the narrative created by opponents of
climate change
policies about high levels of scientific uncertainty and unacceptable harm to the economy from the adoption of
climate policies is not only false but has been manufactured by fossil fuel companies and other entities which have economic interests in continuing high levels of fossil fuel consumption.
Therefore, many of not most
climate policy advocates focused on how to improve
messaging about climate change
policies or how to we incentivize individual behavioral change through the use of economic incentives.
Whereas he was saying that the public are too vulnerable to be exposed to discussions
about uncertainty in scientific debates with implications for
policy, the Guardian journalist — as is Guardian journalists» want — read it as a
message that there was no uncertainty or controversy in
climate science.
While the politics and
policies of
climate change may be complicated, the
message to a CEO is simple: there should be no question
about where your company stands on
climate policy.
The poll by the Catholic University of America and Institute for
Policy Research and Catholic Studies showed that Catholics who frequently attend Mass were more likely to support U.S. government actions to combat
climate change after reading
about the pope's encyclical (59 percent) than after receiving the
message from an alternative source (50 percent).