Sentences with phrase «met by the proponent»
«In December 2013, the Joint Review Panel found that construction and operation of the Northern Gateway Pipelines project is in the public interest, subject to 209 conditions being met by the proponent.
http://www.canadianbusiness.com/
Natural Resources Minister Greg Rickford said in a statement: «In December 2013, the Joint Review Panel found that construction and operation of the Northern Gateway Pipelines project is in the public interest, subject to 209 conditions being met by the proponent.
Not exact matches
Items 4 through 6 are shareholder proposals that will be voted on at the annual meeting only if properly presented by or on behalf of the shareholder proponent.
• The SEC should address «the practice of «proposal by proxy,» where the proponent of a resolution — typically one of the corporate gadflies — has no skin in the game, but rather receives permission to act «on behalf» of a shareholder that meets the threshold.»
Since the issuer's or proponent's definitive filing or notice of meetings is often just the start of multiple filings by issuers and the dissident shareholders, we will review all publicly released materials in conducting its ultimate analysis and accompanying recommendation.
Even if there were no such agreement, «Intelligent Design» fails to meet the basic definition of a scientific idea: its proponents do not present testable hypotheses and do not provide evidence for their views that can be verified or duplicated by subsequent researchers.
This is counter to the claims continuously made by VAM proponents, including folks like Thomas Kane — economics professor from Harvard University who directed the $ 45 million worth of Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) studies for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Under that Rule, the proponent has the burden of establishing that the pertinent admissibility requirements are met by a preponderance of the evidence.»
There is somewhat of a knee - jerk reaction shared, I am sure by many of us, that paying for claims is morally and practically repugnant but will the ban meet the expressed desires of the proponents?