Not exact matches
If this avoidance
of personal pronouns is found to be clumsy or fails to give a proper sense
of God as a being who is related to us in a personal
way, then certainly one is free to
speak of God both as male and as female so long as these usages are understood to be
metaphorical and not to be claiming gender for God, and so long as the male and female references are relatively balanced.
I am first defining the poetic function in a negative manner, following Roman Jakobson, as the inverse
of the referential function understood in a narrow descriptive sense, then in a positive
way as what in my volume on metaphor I call the
metaphorical reference.7 And in this regard, the most extreme paradox is that when language most enters into fiction — e.g., when a poet forges the plot
of a tragedy — it most
speaks truth because it redescribes reality so well known that it is taken for granted in terms
of the new features
of this plot.
«By
way of background, the basic idea behind the sin
of omission, whether as featured in religious traditions or in its secular,
metaphorical form, is that, just as it is wrong to do intentional harm, it is also sometimes wrong to do nothing — that is, it is wrong to fail to act or
speak,» said Ryan.