Clarke recognizes the difference between
metaphysical generality and the particularity of the historic scheme of Christian salvation then justifies generality as part of a universal religion.
The denial by physical science of «action at a distance» is a comment about the present cosmic epoch and carries with
it no metaphysical generality.
Those criteria are also held to have
metaphysical generality, that is, they are valid not only for human beings, but for any possible state of reality.
Hartshorne's assumption that the microcosm of any particular human experience, at the utmost level of
metaphysical generality, resembles the macrocosmic universe even though the latter is an almost infinitely vast conglomeration of other experiences.
When he discusses «the hierarchy of societies composing our present epoch,» he says he is «deserting
metaphysical generality» and only «considering the more special possibilities of explanation consistent with our general cosmological doctrine, but not necessitated by it» (PR 147).
But Whitehead saw «no reason, of any ultimate
metaphysical generality, why this should be the whole story.»
Is there an ultimate
metaphysical generality that makes this so?
Griffin & Sherburne, New York: The Free Press, 1978, 96) His comments are conjectural because he has left
metaphysical generality and is»... considering the more special possibilities of explanation consistent with our general cosmological doctrine, but not necessitated by it.»
He himself explains in an earlier chapter of the same book that «strict
metaphysical generality can stop short of literally «everything»,» because «it is enough if a concept applies with complete and a priori Universality within one logical level» (89).
The principle involved may be extended still further to the level of
metaphysical generality.
But, continues Whitehead, «there is no reason, of any ultimate
metaphysical generality, why this should be the whole story.
Provided that physical science maintains its denial of «action at a distance,» the safer guess is that direct objectification is practically negligible except for contiguous occasions; but that this practical negligibility is a characteristic of the present cosmic epoch, without
any metaphysical generality (Process and Reality, An Essay in Cosmology 468 - 469).
The metaphysical generality of the thesis is a great advantage, however.
provided that physical science maintains its denial of «action at a distance,» the safer guess is that direct objectification is practically negligible except for contiguous occasions; but that this practical negligibility is a characteristic of the present cosmic epoch, without
any metaphysical generality.
It is to be carefully noted that we are now deserting
metaphysical generality.
But there is no reason, of any ultimate
metaphysical generality, why this should be the whole story» (PR 517).
With this general understanding of God's participation in becoming, it should be possible to make some statements of less than
metaphysical generality which have to do with God's aims for particular sorts of occasions.
The final appeal in this endeavor, he contends, is to «the self - evidence of experience» (MT 158), although it should be emphasized that our experience of
metaphysical generalities is neither immediately obvious to consciousness nor readily expressible.
(4) Combinatorial richness: Whitehead evidences a similar concern when he speaks of the expansive potential of
metaphysical generalities throughout the entire scope of both the philosophical model and reality.
Not exact matches
Since then, this conception of metaphysics has given way to one of metaphysics as the study of most basic or general presuppositions, and of the
metaphysical argument as hypothetical in the manner of a scientific theory, but on a level of higher
generality.
The central preoccupation of the philosopher should therefore be the discovery and accurate description of those ultimate
generalities which explain all actual entities Whereas the special sciences seek to uncover the explanatory principles which govern one particular genus of entities,
metaphysical inquiry seeks to uncover truly universal principles which apply to all actual entities insofar as they are actual entities.
He is a
metaphysical order that is exemplified in all orders of less
generality than its own.
The following discussion of power is not meant to be primarily
metaphysical in
generality.
Again, this would make empirical theology merely a variation on foundational or
metaphysical forms of theology, whereas empirical theology begins with despair about foundationalism and its concern with
generalities.
There are only two
metaphysical principles in virtue of which the existence of an actual entity can be inferred; to wit, the principle of efficient causation, and the ontological principle, in virtue of which any
generality of character shared among entities presupposes a character of
generality.
Whitehead's philosophy aims to approach the accurate expression of final
generalities; his
metaphysical categories are conceived as tentative formulations of the ultimate
generalities.
His objection appears to be that the
generality of
metaphysical description in process thought imposes limits upon God's action that are not necessary.
Whitehead summarizes this point well: «
Metaphysical categories are not dogmatic statements of the obvious; they are tentative formulations of the ultimate
generalities.