Not exact matches
It
is fitting then that the final issue to
be resolved regarding the status of a
civilized society should concern the question of the creativity of one and many, e.g.,
is a
civilized society a «one» or a «many»
metaphysically?
Since each of the constituent human
beings of a
civilized society
is itself more ultimate
metaphysically than
is the larger social whole, it follows that a
civilized society
is really only a relational unity composed of many individuals related as one socially.
Accordingly, the «order» of a
civilized society
is «genetically propagated» in terms of commonly accepted and habitually enacted social practices which
are passed on from generation to generation, and thus in the most general terms a
civilized society
is metaphysically constituted as a «social nexus» in a fashion equivalent to that of a Society per se.
In a number of essential ways then, a
civilized society
is metaphysically equivalent to a Society per se, and thus its status as an existent thing
is explicable in terms of Whitehead's organic cosmological scheme.
Thus, according to the cosmological scheme as laid out by Whitehead in the Philosophy of Organism, a
civilized society
is metaphysically equivalent to a Society per se in the most basic and essential respects, and therein its generic status as an existent thing
is secured.
That
is, just as a Society
is metaphysically a derivative type of existent inasmuch as its constituent actual entities
are ontologically ultimate, so in an equivalent fashion, a
civilized society
is metaphysically secondary inasmuch as human
beings are more real, ontologically speaking, than
is the larger
civilized society.
But even as derivative types of existents, a
civilized society and a Society per se
are nonetheless both real in this secondary or dependent sense, and thus
metaphysically speaking, they both must belong to some «category of existence other than that reserved for a primary existent.