It seems to me that they must show deeper mixing than 50 M, since there is not enough mass in the upper 50 meters of ocean to account for the annual heat storage changes that are implied by observations for the the full integrated 700
meter volume of ocean.
Not exact matches
All
of the
oceans on Earth are estimated to have a
volume of 0.3 billion cubic miles (1.332 billion cubic kilometers) and an average depth
of 12,080.7 feet (3,682.2
meters).
That's because the mixed layer (surface to 300
meters) is only about 10 %
of the
ocean volume.
All
of the
oceans on Earth are estimated to have a
volume of 0.3 billion cubic miles (1.332 billion cubic kilometers) and an average depth
of 12,080.7 feet (3,682.2
meters).
The Atlantic annual formation
of deep water has the
volume of about one
meter layer
of surface water
of the
oceans based on a rapid calculation I made.
But it only produced about 1
meter of global sea level rise, assuming an even spread
of this
volume spread across the world's
oceans.
From an earlier article by Bob Tisdale: «That obviously means that about 48 %
of the
ocean volume is above 2000
meters.»
It doesn't even appear to be enough to raise the temperature
of the shallow surface layer by more than a fraction
of a degree to say nothing
of imparting any significant warmth to the other 90 %
of the
volume of the global
ocean below the thermocline (400 +
meters deep).
And nobody really yet understands the complexity
of heat exchange between the mixed layer and thermocline nor between the end
of thermocline and the vast bulk
of the
ocean (90 %
of its
volume) below the 1000
meter extent
of the thermocline.