It is also very hard to know what effect methane from melting permafrost will do and if we will encounter significant releases
of methane clathrates in ocean sediment.
Could it also be due to anoxia happening when
methane clathrates melt — the methane combines with oxygen, forming CO2 and such, depleting the oxygen.
The average
methane clathrate hydrate composition is 1 mole of methane for every 5.75 moles of water, though this is dependent on how many methane molecules «fit» into the various cage structures of the water lattice.
Somehow a rather sensational 2007 article
about methane clathrates, on a left - wing political website called The Canadian, has exposed all those climate scientists as lily - livered Chicken Little worrywarts.
We don't know at precisely what point various warming feedbacks (
like methane clathrate release from the Arctic or methane release from beneath melting permafrost) will be triggered.
I vaguely collect reading that there was a lot of methane on the ocean floor (
as methane clathrate), plus occasional pockets of oil (through accumulation of perished marine life).
This is a much more serious scenario than «regular» anthropogenic GW, because the warming could be amplified, eventually
thawing methane clathrates, and the warming could then really spiral to an massive extinction event level (as happened 251 million years ago when up to 95 % of life on earth died).
Other theories suggest runaway global warming was involved, due either to release of sea -
floor methane clathrates, or even burning coal fields.
The reason is that there is plenty of fossil carbon down there, and we keep finding more: the Japanese have just demonstrated how to mine
sub-ocean methane clathrates.
[6]
A methane clathrate MAS NMR spectrum recorded at 275 K and 3.1 MPa shows a peak for each cage type and a separate peak for gas phase methane.
[4] The ice -
core methane clathrate record is a primary source of data for global warming research, along with oxygen and carbon dioxide.
The
nominal methane clathrate hydrate composition is (CH4) 4 (H2O) 23, or 1 mole of methane for every 5.75 moles of water, corresponding to 13.4 % methane by mass, although the actual composition is dependent on how many methane molecules fit into the various cage structures of the water lattice.
In their Correspondence in the September 2013 Nature Geoscience journal, Vonk and Gustafsson cautioned that the most probable mechanism to strengthen global warming is large - scale thawing of Arctic permafrost which will release
methane clathrate into the atmosphere.
Since methane clathrates are stable at a higher temperature than liquefied natural gas (LNG)(− 20 vs − 162 °C), there is some interest in converting natural gas into clathrates rather than liquifying it when transporting it by seagoing vessels.
[39] BP deployed the system on May 7 — 8, but it failed due to buildup of
methane clathrate inside the dome; with its low density of approximately 0.9 g / cm3 the methane hydrates accumulated in the dome, adding buoyancy and obstructing flow.
The size of the
oceanic methane clathrate reservoir is poorly known, and estimates of its size decreased by roughly an order of magnitude per decade since it was first recognized that clathrates could exist in the oceans during the 1960s and 1970s.
Both Japan and China announced in May 2017 a breakthrough for
mining methane clathrates, when they extracted methane from hydrates in the South China Sea.
The Storegga slide area today
contains methane clathrate deposits as indicated by a seismic BSR corresponding to the base of the HSZ at 200 - 300 meters, and pockmarks indicating gas expulsion from the sediment.
It postulates that
methane clathrate at shallow depth begins melting and through the feed - back process accelerate atmospheric and oceanic warming, melting even larger and deeper clathrate deposits.
One liter of
methane clathrate solid would therefore contain, on average, 168 liters of methane gas (at STP)» so the formation of clathrates near the wellhead would buoyantly transport the gas to near surface layers above the clathrate stability zone, where it would break down into bubbles and dissolve; I think that turbulence in the rising column would disperse the clathrate and bubbles widely enough that little if any would make it directly to the surface.
Harvey, L.D.D., and Z. Huang, Evaluation of the potential impact of
methane clathrate destabilization on future global warming, J. Geophysical Res., 100, 2905 - 2926, 1995.
This does not include large - scale «harvesting» of natural gas
from methane clathrate deposits beneath the ocean, which WEC has ignored in its estimate.
They're even exploring new possibilities in hydrocarbons (
like methane clathrate), and looking for new oil reserves (like in the Arctic).
At a depth of 50 meters or less the East Siberian Arctic Shelf contains the shallowest
methane clathrate deposits, and is thus most vulnerable to rising water temperatures.
1995 L.D. Danny Harvey and Zhen Huang, «Evaluation of the Potential Impact
of Methane Clathrate Destabilization on Future Global Warming.»
Regarding the possible role hydrogen sulfide in the major extinctions you might want to check out another book, one which places it in the context of
the methane clathrate gun, the destruction of the coccolithophores which help to maintain an oxygenated atmosphere by ocean acidification, the role of algae blooms, etc...
In summary, immense quantities of
methane clathrate have been identified in the Arctic.